Saturday, July 26, 2025

Scot Goes Pop Fundraiser 2025: Another update, and a crunch-point


Many thanks to everyone who has donated since the last update.  Progress has been made, although the fundraiser is still only 46% funded with less than half the year still to go.  Obviously I chose the target as the minimum I would realistically need to keep the blog viable for a year, and on the current trajectory it's likely to fall well short - which leaves me back in my now-familiar position of lurching from mini-crisis to mini-crisis and having to constantly post these updates just to try to stay afloat.

I know we've had the conversation a million times before about alternative funding models, and I have genuinely been thinking about trying something new in recent weeks.  We're forever hearing that conventional blogging is "yesterday's medium", so one thought I've been seriously toying with is moving across either in part or wholesale to video content.  If I could multiply my number of YouTube subscribers by about five and post original content extremely regularly, it might be possible to gradually start making an income that way.  In a sense it would also allow me to keep the blog going because I could very easily embed each video here.  However, one thing I've noticed is that when I do occasionally make videos (the most recent one was earlier this year), they tend to get significantly fewer views than the average number of page views for each blogpost.  That implies regular readers are highly geared towards text content rather than other media, and that to build up a YouTube channel I'd need to largely seek a new audience.  That would take time, and the problem is much more urgent than that - hence the need to make the current fundraiser work somehow, by hook or by crook.  (Well, not crook, obviously.)

The other problem is that for the moment I don't have the technical skills or equipment to make videos to a high standard.  You might remember that just for the fun of it, I switched to video content for some of my coverage of the 2019 general election, and as can be seen from this example, the content itself was fine but the technical quality was, to put it mildly, bargain-basement.  I later invested hundreds of pounds in a camera which was billed as "perfect for YouTube", but after a few videos I gave up on it in despair and went back to doing the videos on my phone, because I just couldn't seem to use it properly.  I always seemed to be slightly out of focus in the videos, or the lighting was wrong, or there were weird shadows across my face.  What can I say, I analyse polls and give my political opinions - I've never claimed to be François Truffaut.  

It's a great pity there doesn't seem to be as much call these days for genuinely audio-only content - popular podcasts usually seem to have a video version as well.  Audio content is far easier to make to a decent standard, and I do have a high-quality microphone, which I bought way back in 2016 for a livestreamed debate with Tommy Sheridan about tactical voting on the list (the more things change, the more they stay the same!).  What I might do is concentrate on audio on a transitional basis and post the files on YouTube with a still picture attached, so I can make a start on gradually building up the channel while I'm getting my head around how I can make videos of adequate quality.

In the meantime, though, I'm going to have to keep plugging away with the current fundraiser, just to keep the show on the road in any shape or form.  So if you find Scot Goes Pop useful and you have £5 or £10 to spare, please remember that small donations are just as useful as larger ones.  If 400 people all donated £10 (and there are far more than 400 people who read this blog every day), the problem would be solved overnight.

Card donations can be made at the crowdfunder page HERE.

As an alternative, direct donations by PayPal can eliminate fees altogether depending on the option you select from the menu.  My PayPal email address is:  jkellysta@yahoo.co.uk

Donations are also very welcome by direct bank transfer if that is your preference, although for obvious reasons I've always been advised not to post my bank details publicly.  So if you'd like to donate that way, please drop me a line and I'll send you the details directly.  My contact email address can be found on my Twitter or BlueSky profiles.

Many thanks in advance to everyone who helps Scot Goes Pop keep going in some form.

58 comments:

  1. From the BBC Scotland, website announcing that Polis Scotland will not be pursuing allegations of impropriety against Alex Salmond.
    “ The women who made the allegations against the ex-SNP leader - which dated back to his time as first minister - included an SNP politician, a party worker and several Scottish government officials.”.
    It seems the BBC is guilty of jigsaw identification, but we ken weal that the law in this country is applied according to the whims of oor highfalutin Judges.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. If you do not know by now who these women are and therefore who was behind the plot to jail Salmond you must be a hermit living in a cave.

      Delete
    2. Can you enlighten us? Easy to make a claim knowing that no one can risk providing the detail that blows your ridiculous conspiracy theory to smithereens. Get a life. Bring us up to date on the action by A S’s legal representatives.

      Delete
    3. Up pops a hermit newly out of his cave at 5.36pm.

      Delete
    4. Anon at 5.36pm says “ your ridiculous conspiracy theory “ as anon at 4.44pm never posted a conspiracy theory how do you jump to the conclusion it is ridiculous when you don’t know the plot he refers to. It’s you anon at 5.36 that is ridiculous .

      Delete
    5. So you cannot enlighten us. Why would that be? Because you made it up? Yep. Put up or shut up.

      Delete
    6. If they really wanted Salmond guilty he'd have been guilty
      It's not important one way or another now the damage by the British and Salmond has been done, and for good or bad the opinions have been formed, and all were judged by the most important mugs in the land, the public

      Delete
    7. 9.07 is there something wrong with your ability to read. I didn’t make anything up so therefore I cannot enlighten you. So stop being ridiculous and so rude.

      Delete
    8. Anon at 12.55. What are you talking about? Where is the reference to you in the post at 9.07? Take your time. Try to stay off line when you are pissed you cretin.

      Delete
    9. alex salmond's ghost touched me up

      is still more credible than any of the allegations made when he was alive

      my favourite was the contortionist over-under-and-in molestation over the armrest in the back of a limo while the "victim" (it was real, in my mind) had her husband in the front seat, but Salmond with his mind control rays hypnotised her into not screaming out ...

      it coulda happened
      it mighta happened
      are you saying it didnt happen
      are you calling me a liar

      Delete
    10. The Salmond criminal trial proved that in Scotland if you are backed by the right people you can tell blatant lies in a High Court criminal case and not be prosecuted for perjury.

      Delete
    11. Anon at 2.10 pm. You are clearly clueless.

      Delete
  2. Why would they. He passed away.

    ReplyDelete
  3. From the aforementioned YouGov poll on Palestine.
    Excluding don’t know, Support for trade sanctions against the Zionist state.
    UK wide: net +42%, Scotland: net +52%, Labour supporters: net +64%.
    Starmer is committing seppuku at the behest of his controllers / paymasters / blackmailers.

    Meanwhile on planet Gammon, RefUK supporters: net -18%. Even Conservative Party supporters are in favour of trade sanctions (net +14%).

    The preliminary stages of European football competitions have begun, and the Zionist state is being allowed to participate. What are UEFA playing at?
    Germany is the most populous country in Europe. The Bundesliga are enormously wealthy. Most crucially, adidas are the official supplier partner of UEFA.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Allowing Israel to play football with other nations/clubs while they roll out a genocide is just monstrous. What the hell is wrong with people?

      Delete
    2. Apparently even the AfD (Macht Deutschland Weider Groß) is split on Israel vs. Gaza, as their Islamophobia and racism makes supporting Israel’s actions so attractive, versus the fact they are Jews.

      As for the German public…

      //
      Recent polls indicate that German public opinion has turned sharply against Israel’s actions in Gaza.
      Key findings from surveys conducted in 2025 include:
      - 65% of Germans consider Israel's actions in Gaza "inappropriate" and only 13% explicitly
      support the military campaign.
      - 63% say Israel’s actions have exceeded acceptable limits; only 18% find them justified.
      - 57% now hold a negative view of Israel as a country, reversed from a minority pre-2023.
      - 73% see “some truth” in describing Israel’s actions in Gaza as “genocide,” while only 9% reject this language.
      - Only about a quarter of Germans agree Germany has a special responsibility to Israel due to history, and among AfD voters, support for this idea is even lower.
      - Net favorability towards Israel in Germany fell to -44%, the lowest since recordkeeping began, with just 13–21% holding a favorable opinion and 63–70% unfavorable.
      - About 40% of Germans think arms exports to Israel should be restricted, and 30% call for a full stop to military aid.
      - Many Germans also hold Israel and Hamas similarly responsible for civilian suffering in Gaza.
      These findings make clear that a solid majority of the German public now view Israel’s war conduct negatively, even as the German government’s official position has remained more
      supportive of Israel’s right to self-defense. This gap between government and public opinion is now noted by multiple political commentators and pollsters.
      //

      So even Germans are tired of Israel’s shit. Yet our governments are still shoulder to shoulder with the occupier.

      Delete
    3. Maccabi Tel-Aviv are set to play Dynamo Kyiv in the Champions league qualifiers.

      Delete
    4. @6.42
      Some interesting spellings there. Oh, dear!

      Delete
    5. “Wir sind gewohnt dass die Menschen verhöhnen was sie nicht verstehen. (Goethe)—We are used to see that Man mocks what he never comprehends.”

      Delete
    6. They world's political classes want Palestine gone, they just pretend to the voters that they don't when it becomes uncomfortable for them
      They've all done it, the British wiped out the Aborigine in Australia, Americans wiped out the Indian tribes there, Hitler did the Jews in
      Donald Trump and Tony Blair's Riviera beach resort in Gaza is a development worth too much money to pass up so the animals must be made gone
      Call them any name you like but the Trumps have been around since before the Romans the British the French the Germans and countless others that take over countries, their own and anybody else's, and they're still around today
      They never represent us because we're the same and might be the next people they wipe out
      God save the elite rich politicians and the Royals of the world
      aren't they lovely? give us a wave now, gee I feel so good and wanted

      Delete
  4. Even taking their RefUK friendly history into account, the polling company Find Out Now’s latest effort is a doozie.
    Westminster voting intention, field work 23rd July, sample population 2,651.
    Con 16%, Lab 20%, LibDem 14%, RefUK 34%.
    A 14% lead for RefUK. Approximately three times the current average.

    If you thought that was wild, haud oan tae yer bunnet.
    Scottish sub-sample (121).
    Con 10%, Lab 13%, LibDem 11%, RefUK 29%, SNP 28%, Green 5%.

    Polling by Facebook?

    ReplyDelete
  5. James: I enjoy reading blogs (particularly yours, which I've been following since 2014). I don't do YouTube - not sure why, maybe I just like to set my own pace in reading. So this seems to support your feeling that you might need a different audience - blog readers might not all switch to video.

    ReplyDelete
  6. Thoughts on Mhairi Black quitting The SNP?

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Black's a career politician. It's served its purpose.

      Delete
    2. Her enormous intellect will be missed.

      Delete
    3. Is she joining Reform?

      Delete
    4. She'll be grand on the after dinner circuit teamed up with Fergus Ewing (I would actually pay good money to see that!)

      Delete
    5. I think it is sad she is leaving. Personally I think she was an asset as she was very popular in media circles. She is also very good on LGBTQ+ issues.

      Delete
    6. Anon@4.26pm what issues does a + sign have exactly?

      Delete
    7. Anon at 4.26. Is this satire? If not, you are giving her credit for playing a big part in inflicting the extensive damage caused to the SNP and the broader Indy movement.

      Delete
  7. Happy to make a small donation to keep this blog going James, the polling analysis is very valuable.

    I do prefer text for this kind of content, and as you say that's where your current audience is. But video/audio is where it's at these days, so best to do an "all of the above" approach.

    You'll certainly find a much wider audience by creating video content and putting on youtube and other social media. Even if you just do a voiceover over graphics to start.

    For actual video content lighting is the most important thing, the camera is really secondary. Get good lighting and any camera will do, even your phone!

    ReplyDelete
  8. Sorry to see Mhairi Black leaving - she was very good.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. I thought she was a bit of a Jeremy Hunt.

      Delete
    2. Where is she going? Australia?

      Delete
    3. She was and is very good at self-promotion and self-identifying as a person of integrity.

      Delete
    4. 4.12pm so do you think she was right to take a drag Queen called Flow Job in to a primary school? Perhaps you can explain exactly what she was promoting in doing this?

      Delete
  9. Starmer has been proving beyond any doubt that he deserves to be called Sir Kid Starver.

    Starmer and Swinney sucking up to Trump the kid killer.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Change the record IfS.

      Delete
    2. IFFsy has actually got the Trump call right. It’s not difficult. Do you oppose genocide? Yes. Then you oppose Trump and you oppose Westminster. Easy.

      Delete
    3. With trumps arrival and Murray and Starmer sookin up to Trump we can see the occupation of Scotland.

      Delete
    4. Murray looked like an excited wee boy, grinning stupidly.

      Delete
    5. When I criticised Black on SGP I got trolled by halfwits like 11.26am. Now the halfwits are catching up with me and criticising Black. But do they call themselves unionists. No they don't but they are numpties.

      Delete
  10. I’ll change it by returning to the topic of Mhairi Black: she’s left the SNP. This is great news for the SNP as she’s a complete liability.

    Cheerio Mhari, and mind you don’t come back.

    She’d be a better fit for the kamikaze Scottish Greens, not least on all the make-believe gender ideology stuff.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Studenty politics like hers always destroys the Left’s credibility. As you say, she’s a better fit for the Greens. They can hoover up a fair few votes that will help the cause - no need for them to be seen as a serious party of government.

      Delete
    2. If Mhairi Black had stuck to the politics of Scottish independence I would have been sorry to see her go, but she didn’t, and allowed herself to be drawn in to the gender cult that has done so much damage to SNP and the wider Indy movement.

      Delete
    3. The Scottish Greens, are not a good fit for (careerist) Mhairi Black. Their selection process for Holyrood 2026, is officially done (the stooshie rages on). Perhaps the entity as yet not registered with the Electoral Commission, and fronted by Jeremy Corbyn, and Zarah Sultana is a better bet?
      If it can survive to May 2026 without fracturing into the Judean People’s Front / People’s Front of Judea, it could take seats on the list. An unholy alliance of scunnered Labour Party voters with SSP, disaffected former SNP supporters, and Solidarity folk thrown in. Five percent is entirely obtainable.

      Delete
    4. She can't join the Corbyn party unless she renounces Scottish independence, if she did join them then her political life in Scotland would be over for good
      Politically she's reduced herself to being a placard waver for less than 1% of the population of Scotland
      She might end up having to get a job

      Delete
    5. Anon @10:03: what's the evidence that's "careerist"? She said she wouldn't stand again in July 2023, some time before the SNP went down the toilet in the polls. At that time she'd have been expected to keep her seat and had just been made depute leader of the Westminster group. Bailing out at that point doesn't seem particularly careerist.

      Delete
    6. Anon @11:34: Did you just make up this claim that you can't join the Corbyn party without renouncing independence?

      Delete
    7. Anon at 11.10. Yes he did just make it up, in the same way as the usual suspects on here make a lot of things up. They made up the lie that Corbyn is opposed in principle to self determination for Scotland. If you point out that he is on record as saying exactly the opposite they simply refuse to accept it. They are a sad bunch. Led by poor wee IFSsy, who lives a fantasy life of conspiracy theories and downright lies. IFSsy got banned from WOS. That’s bad in anyone’s book. The good thing for IFSsy is that he is irredeemably stupid, and therefore feels no embarrassment or shame. It would be good for him to try to secure employment, but who is going to employ him?

      Delete
    8. What a bizarre rant. No one even mentioned IFS.

      Delete
    9. She wont waste her time joining Alba or any other comedy parties.

      Delete
  11. She wasn’t drawn in, she promoted.

    ReplyDelete
  12. Obscenity

    It's obscene that Trump is galavanting about Scotland.
    It's obscene that Starmer/Swinney/Murray are all sucking up to him.
    It's obscene that Trump could put a stop to the genocide in Gaza but here he is playing golf in Scotland.
    It's obscene Trump owns beautiful Turnberry golf course.
    It's obscene the American public voted for a convicted felon and a convicted rapist in a civil court.
    It's obscene that politicians and the media call Israel a democracy.

    ReplyDelete
  13. Hello, first time commentor here. Have you considered putting your podcasts (just the audio) on a platform that runs ads? Looking through the podcasts I tend to listen to (actual audio podcasts, not Youtube videos), the most common platform used seems to be Acast. I don't use Spotify, so I can't speak to that.

    For what it's worth, Lesley Ridoch's podcast (probably the biggest fish in the small pond that is pro-indy podcasting) remains audio only to this day, even on Youtube.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. I agree that audio only is absolutely fine. As Ridoch’s podcast shows. Video is difficult to get right, as I know from personal experience, and as you too pointed out, James.

      I stopped listening to that podcast a while ago. I was finding her and especially the guy she was doing the podcast with increasingly irritating. But not as irritating as the overwhelmingly self-satisfied bunch of opinion writers in The National (not a dig at James). As a movement I really think it’s time for a rethink and a refresh in terms of the pro-Indy voices we are promoting,

      Delete