An audio podcast version of the above video can be heard HERE, and will soon be available on Apple Podcasts HERE.
Other recent videos:
Another stunning SNP by-election GAIN as the Tories go into FREEFALL in the north-east of Scotland
Burnham in danger of making government from Manchester as remote and alien as government from London
Yet another poll suggests Burnham surge is a damp squib - SNP dominant in Scottish subsample
If you'd like to help support my YouTube channel, I've set up a new Ko-Fi page.
More idiocy from Campbell who is asking the gullible to fund the legal fees involved in the doomed group court action against the SNP. The pursuers have apparently been assured that they risk no personal liability for expenses if (when) they lose the case. That will come as news to the Court of Session. I would not risk personal financial ruin to fuel the ego and hatred of a moron who doesn’t live in Scotland, has never voted in Scotland and devotes his life to hating the S G and SNP and of course, men in skirts. What a guy. Anyone allowing themselves to be named as a pursuer should seek immediate independent legal advice as to the risks they face. The Legal profession owes Campbell a debt of gratitude for all the money he has diverted their way via his idiot followers. The summons has been reproduced word for word in Campbell’s most recent post. The holes in the case start to appear within a few pages. The range of terms used in the summons to attempt to establish both the purpose of the funding and the conditions on which it was donated tell a story. Spoiler. It’s not a helpful story for Campbell. Popcorn time.
ReplyDeleteWhatever the flaws in his case, the real problem is that money was given by generous contributors for a worthy cause. The party appears to have had no intention to honour that cause. Section 30, anyone?
DeleteCampbell has his fans, such as Peter A Bell who went on a rant in the National yesterday denouncing critics of Campbell as SNP cultists.
Delete"a rant in the National yesterday"
DeleteLink ?
Weird since Campbell is clearly a britnat.
DeleteAnon at 8.11. In the real world events unfolded that resulted in the referendum not going ahead. If it had gone ahead and we lost, Indy would have been off the agenda for the foreseeable future. Unionists would have been delighted.
DeleteTo aLurker, the link check btl in the National article on July 8 titled "SNP face group legal action."
DeleteI don’t get why The National is so against data centres in Scotland. We could be a world leader in an emerging technology.
ReplyDeleteHaving lots of data centres in your country makes you a world leader in emerging tech in the same way that having a lot of warehouses makes you a leader in the retail sector
Delete"Revealed: landmark Scottish AI project has no prospect of meeting renewables promise"
Deletehttps://www.theguardian.com/technology/2026/jul/06/lanarkshire-scotland-ai-datacentre-project-renewable-energy
Does anyone else wonder if Andy Burnham often drapes a black scarf over his head pretending to be a Greek peasant woman? I do. A lot.
ReplyDeleteBurnham is in need of a marriage councillor before the rings have even been exchanged. So much for a honeymoon period.
ReplyDeleteFind Out Now, Westminster voting intention, field work 8 - 9 July, population sample 2,076.
RefUK lead down to 3%, ahead of Tories. Labour languishing on 18%.
Scottish sub-sample (102)
Con 14%, Lab 17%, LibDem 12%, RefUK 10%, Green 7%, SNP 36%
Ot- I see the Brit museum has sent the Lewis Chessman to France in part for them getting the Bayeux tapestry to London under police protection. Is it just me or should Scotlands heritage be back in Scotland and where and how it is used is decided locally. Lewis chessmen for Lewis!!
ReplyDelete