Sunday, May 10, 2026

All I needed was the love you gave, all I needed for another day, and all I ever knew, only Stew

Tragically, the controversial Somerset-based "Stew" blogger stopped updating his little shrine to me a few months ago, but I no longer need to feel neglected because he's been properly going off on one about me since the election.  He made a rather optimistic effort to accuse me of contradicting myself on the interminable subject of "tactical voting on the list", because on Thursday morning I urged people to vote Both Votes SNP, while on Saturday I pointed out that the reason the pro-indy majority at Holyrood had increased was because a significant proportion of SNP supporters had tactically switched to the Greens on the list.  But unfortunately for him, the screenshots he used demonstrated rather helpfully that there was no contradiction, because they clearly showed that I went on to say that the tactical voters had been taking a hell of a risk that could easily have backfired if their assumptions about how the constituency results would pan out had been proved wrong.  In other words, the tactical voting produced a good outcome simply because of luck - and one of the main reasons for my Both Votes SNP advice was because I didn't think (and still don't think) that people should be relying on luck.

However, all of this begs a question that I genuinely don't have an answer to.  One thing that is beyond dispute is that the tactical voting only worked because the recipients of the tactical votes were the Greens.  No other pro-independence party was remotely strong enough to win seats - by Stew's own admission Atlas were a "shambles", while all of the other pro-indy fringe parties were even less popular.  And yet we know he categorically did not want people to vote Green - he hates the Greens with every fibre of his being, and wanted everyone to vote against them on principle.  So when he says that people like me who voted SNP on the list were stupid because we were "helping to get unionists elected", who does he actually think we should have been voting for instead?  Who is actually left once you exclude the SNP, the Greens and the "shambolic" fringe parties like Atlas?  

OK, we kind of know the answer in the sense that he was obviously gagging for people to vote Reform.  But that wasn't his official advice, because he kept saying that SNP list voters were helping to elect Reform MSPs, as if that was a bad thing.  So who was he officially telling people to vote for on the list?  Can anyone fathom it?

Actually, if anyone is still on good terms with him, please do ask him, I'd be genuinely fascinated to find out the answer.  It'll be like cracking the code of an unsolvable equation.

*  *  *

Please check out the Scot Goes Pop polling fundraiser, particularly if you'd be interested in helping me commission another opinion poll in the future at a moment of maximum impact.

13 comments:

  1. In the Belgian Parliamentary dining rooms only cold food has been served since 1929.

    ReplyDelete
  2. It wouldnt surprise me if the snp ever do get a majority they will need list votes.

    Happened in 2011.

    ReplyDelete
  3. Swinney needs to have his feet held to the fire over what he said, but the problem is that nobody actually quotes him, what they do is "interpret" what he said, and interpret it according to their own often limited understanding of any process and at times what the significance is of what he says - or what they think he said or even what they want or don't want him to have said. That means he could almost justifiably look at all the misquotes, misinterpretations and false conclusions and say to himself:

    "Well, nobody has a single solitary clue what I actually promised, so I can quietly do nothing".

    WELL JOHN THINK AGAIN - THIS IS WHAT YOU DID SAY - and I totally understand the meaning and significance of what you said, and indeed the process it sits in. Here is what you DID say:

    https://www.snp.org/first-minister-john-swinneys-speech-on-the-snps-plan-for-the-first-100-days-of-the-next-parliament/

    "So I can confirm today that on the first sitting day after the appointment of the new government, we will bring forward a vote of the Scottish Parliament to approve the development of a Section 30 to give Scotland the power to hold an independence referendum."

    I'm watching you, and I'm holding you to it. Just do it.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. "Swinney needs to have his feet held to the fire"

      He's not enough of a sole man.

      Delete
    2. I doubt that Swinney will be losing sleep !

      Delete
  4. Surely the AtLS intention was not to gain seats but merely to try and divert independence supporters from voting for the SNP - same as the Alba strategy. Just to siphon off as many SNP votes as they could. An ad-hoc diversion act.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Barrheid Boy and his chums will be skint with all the lost deposits they'll have to pay for.

      Delete
  5. As many have pointed out, the SNP won this election in a very similar way to Starmer's "loveless" win in 2024: less votes than before but hauling home the constituencies against a divided opposition. Does that mean they are as ripe for displacement as Labour? Could someone else become the dominant Party of Independence?

    Looking at the vote tallies in Edinburgh, you see the Greens romp home in Leith, coming top of the list there outright. They're a strong presence across Edinburgh and Glasgow now, and a competitive one all over Scotland. Electorally speaking, the SNP finally has a rival on the rise: and this one supports Scottish independence.

    Might be wise to get cracking on with indy, then!

    ReplyDelete
  6. Stew is increasingly irrelevant to Scottish politics.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. He always was. I was calling him out from early doors and subjected to personal attack. I am now calling out J S. He needs to acknowledge his error of judgement and enter a working relationship with the greens. And he needs to forge an alliance with Wales and N I. Has he started any of this?

      Delete
  7. I gave the Greens my second vote in 2021. I did that on the basis that the SNP were standing at over 40% in Scottish opinion polls. The SNP got both my votes this time because, as you have said, it was far too risky not to when the SNP were only at the mid 30's percentage range in the polls. My biggest fear was that the SNP support wouldn't turnout at the polling stations. I was very pleased that it did.

    ReplyDelete
  8. As is Jim Sillars, who is moaning about Swinney ignoring Reform.

    ReplyDelete
  9. Stu kept telling people 'both votes SNP' led to a lot of wasted votes on the list. People finally started listening - and drew the obvious conclusion that the way to max the indy vote was to vote Green on the list. That's the real 'both votes indy'. Nobody was going to waste votes on Stu's pet microparties like Atomwaffen, Sludge or PIS

    ReplyDelete