I can't imagine how much more disturbing I'd find it to live in a Scotland where a culture of death has been reintroduced in a completely different but much more widespread form. Death certificates giving state-assisted suicide as the cause of death would become extremely routine, far more so than was the case with the death penalty - 5% of all deaths in Canada are now assisted suicide, and it's likely that we would follow suit. If you could guarantee me that the only people who would die under the new system would be single-minded, determined individuals who had freely chosen to avoid suffering, and who had not been coerced or malignly influenced, either directly or indirectly, then probably my attitude would be different. But anyone who actually believes that is astoundingly naive.
If this legislation goes through, there will be people who die for economic reasons - either because they've been told they are a burden or because they assume that other people regard them as a burden. There will be people who die because of treatable depression or low self-esteem or personality disorders. There will be people who die because doctors actively put the idea into their heads. For the first time since 1963, society and the state will be deciding that some people are better off dead and actually making them dead.
I hope this bill is rejected. If it's not, I'm not sure I'll even recognise this country in the years to come.
Incidentally, when I spoke out a few weeks ago against Ash Regan's bid to introduce the Nordic Model on prostitution law, Stuart Campbell rather outrageously implied that I must have been motivated by self-interest, ie. that I must be someone who pays for sex myself. I'll be interested to see what dark or cynical motivation he'll ascribe to me in this case. It's true that I was brought up a Catholic, and that probably does influence me, because my default setting is that life is sacred unless there's an exceptionally good reason. But I'm not sure that's such a bad principle to live by, and it's fair to say a great many atheists take exactly the same view, even if the terminology they use is different.
I'm also against for exactly the same reasons. Having legal assisted dying actually incentivises the state and private organisations to make the lives of terminally ill people miserable so as to nudge them in the direction of suicide. Uncomfortable rooms, inadequate care, crap food all build up and sap your will to go on.
ReplyDeleteAssisted dying without guaranteed high standards of palliative care is euthanasia.
In case anyone asks, I'm against capital punishment and for a woman's body autonomy
I’m against it being on the NHS because I do not trust hospital and NHS managers. They are not clinicians but have targets to meet and costs to save.
ReplyDeleteI believe it should be a private option, regulated by the state, but not provided by it. It could be taken out as a medical insurance policy or added to a funeral plan. The providers could be a registered charity. But being a private option, which people have chosen when in health for a time in the future when they might prefer that exit if life had become intolerable, there would be no question of coercion because the person has already decided long ago that this would be their preferred option if faced with unendurable terminal suffering.