I'm not planning to launch a full-scale fundraiser for 2026, because as you know, back in the summer I made the decision that I couldn't keep lurching from mini-crisis to mini-crisis forever, and that I was going to have to find a more sustainable funding model - either that or get out of the political blogging game completely. Apart from anything else, I am heartily sick of the accusations of "grifting" and I am determined to bring the days of embarrassing year-round crowdfunding to an end (since 2021 it's become like the proverbial task of painting the Forth Bridge). The grifting allegations are completely bogus, let me stress - nobody would be able to devote the sheer amount of time I have to writing about politics unless they either a) have private means, or b) can bring in funding from somewhere. I do not have private means, but if my detractors do, then they have my congratulations. And I've certainly never written anything I don't believe in the hope of attracting funding, which as I understand it is the essence of what grifting means. A certain fake curate in Somerset used his Facebook page a few weeks ago to accuse me of doing exactly that, which frankly I regard as an absolutely despicable thing to say. Apparently to qualify as honest in what you write, you have to agree with all of his own political views. What should really terrify him is that I actually do believe every single word I write.
But I'm only human and being constantly told I'm a grifter takes its toll. I want that to stop, which is why the YouTube monetisation model has so much appeal - it doesn't rely on reader/viewer contributions at all. I'd be able to stop crowdfunding, keep all of the content completely free, and embed all of the videos on this blog. But as always in life, there's a snag. In order to even *apply* for monetisation, I have to reach two very challenging thresholds - I need at least 1000 YouTube subscribers and 4000 watch-hours over the last year. It's taken me five long months of making regular videos to reach the second threshold, and I still haven't reached the first one - as I write this I have only 911 subscribers. That may not sound like much of a shortfall, but based on the current rate of progress I probably won't get there until around Christmas Day, give or take a few days. The application process will then apparently take around 30 more days, with no guarantee I'll be successful. Even if I'm approved, it will then take yet another month or two to find out whether enough funds are coming through to make the idea work. Based on what I've read about average earnings on YouTube, it should just about be feasible as long as I'm making videos extremely frequently, but the problem is that there's a huge amount of variation on either side of the average, and if I find myself on the wrong side of that equation, I'll be right back to square one.
If YouTube doesn't work out, Plan B will be to move over to Substack or something similar. That's very much the second-best option, though, because it would mean leaving this site behind and putting at least some content behind a paywall. But I will give that a try if all else fails. And if neither YouTube or Substack work out, I will reluctantly call it a day at that point.
So as you can see, I'm basically in total limbo until I can get through the YouTube application process. The paradox is, then, that to get to the point where I can stop crowdfunding, I'm going to have to crowdfund one last time. I've done some sums to work out a realistic figure for what I'll need to raise to get me through this long transitional period, and I reckon £1500 will just about do the trick. To give myself a bit of leeway and to take account of GoFundMe fees, I've set the target for the final fundraiser at £1700.
Incidentally, some of the "Kelly is a grifter" mob have specifically made an issue of the fact that I went on a short holiday in late August and made a couple of videos for the YouTube channel while I was away (one in Sark and one in Saint Malo). It's probably true that if I hadn't made that trip, I'd be a few hundred pounds closer to safety now, but what can I say? I unexpectedly found a bargain-basement deal for five nights in Jersey, the weather was fantastic, and I came back feeling refreshed and like I'd actually had a proper summer. So from a personal point of view it still feels like the right decision, but there are so many little decisions in life that are effectively trade-offs, and there are no right or wrong answers. For the most part I do live frugally. I did go and see a special showing of Metropolis in Edinburgh on Thursday night (which was fascinating - as far as I can remember it's the first full-length silent film I've ever seen), but that was my first proper night out in weeks.
I also realise I'm tempting fate by calling this the "final" fundraiser so definitively, but put it this way - in any foreseeable circumstances it'll be the last one.
Just a word about GoFundMe's fees: technically they eliminated their fees a few years ago, but they do still push you extremely hard to leave them a sizeable tip, and I think you have to manually adjust the suggested tip down to zero if you don't want to pay them anything. Additionally they use an external payment processor, which does still charge a small fee. There is, however, a way of cutting out the middle-man and paying no fees at all, and that's to make a direct donation via PayPal. My PayPal email address is: jkellysta@yahoo.co.uk
Or of course there's also the option of direct bank transfer. If you'd like to do that, please drop me a line and I'll send you the necessary details. My contact email address is different from my Paypal address, and can be found in the mini-bio on my Twitter profile or on my BlueSky profile.
I'm very much aware that Christmas is around the corner, so please only donate if you can afford to. Remember also that small donations are just as valuable as large ones - if even a modest percentage of the people who read this blog on an average day were to donate just £10 each, the target would be reached instantly.
And if you have a Google account, there's also a way of helping without paying a penny - and that's by subscribing to my channel on YouTube. If I could somehow speed up the process of getting to 1000 subscribers, that could potentially make a big difference.
Many people will know that electricscotland.com is a fantastic resource dating back to last century. Here's about the author who now lives in Canada having given up on Scotland. We are indeed our own worst enema, as can be seen from many of the anonymous posting here.
ReplyDeletehttps://electricscotland.com/history/other/mcintyre_alastair.htm
Capella from WGD may be interested in that - and SGP too.
I'd keep the crowdfunder going next year, as people occasionally get a few spare pounds to support you.
I value your written blog posts, always something to think about, but I cannot subscribe to the YouTube channel - we're in an age now where everything has to be apparently delivered by influencers on video, and I've just not bought into that! But good luck with whatever route you take.
ReplyDeleteI think the chances of me ever being an "influencer" are pretty slim. To me, that word calls to mind beautiful 25 year old women on Instagram with 19 million followers.
DeletePoor wee Stewie is falling to pieces. He needs some time in a retreat, somewhere they'll confiscate his phone so he can't read your tweets. It seems to be too much for him to cope with right now.
ReplyDeleteAh! "with seat projections from a neutral source, in the shape of the newish Devolved Elections website."
DeleteA guy who previously worked on the Scottish Election Study at the University of Edinburgh. That's the study for which to get the actual referendum result, they'd have had to have polled 8 times as many women voters as men.
Ummmm, I'll pass on that.
Poor wee stewie is hanging together by a very slender thread these days.
ReplyDeleteHe knows the SNP are going to win handsomely next year in Scotland, and in a UK context, hates the Labour party, has given up on the LibDems, knows his previous favourites the Tories are now history, watches through gritted teeth as Polanski takes the Greens to a remarkabls 18% in very recent polling and scuttles faster and faster into the racist fascist swamp of Reform.
And then of course, there is Alba......
What's the point of Alba these days?
DeleteYouGov, Westminster voting intention, field work 30 Nov - 1 Dec.
ReplyDeleteUK headlines; RefUK 7% lead, +1% week on week, Labour holding up at 19%.
Labour should ride out the Rachel Reeves scandal. The public appear to have taken favourably to the budget. Who cares if Rachel was lying, it’s the pennies in your purse that matter.
Scottish sub-sample (204)
Con 9%, Lab 16%, LibDem 12%, SNP 39%, RefUK 14%, Green 8%.
An excellent series of numbers for a notionally independence alliance, and a particularly poor result for RefUK of late.
I've subscribed to your YouTube.
ReplyDeleteYou should do opinions on American politics. On yt
Thanks for the sub. A few weeks ago, I was thinking about doing a video about Zohran Mamdani's views on Israel, but the moment sort of passed.
DeletePocket, dipped. Hand, into.
ReplyDeleteStill the best Scottish polling analysis on the net, written or vlog.
Many thanks, I really appreciate it.
DeleteI see that the genocide supporting Labour man Lammy is another of those people who want to get rid of juries. Not surprising as Israel don't bother with juries for their Palestinian hostages either. Most don't even get charged or a trial. Just chucked in a jail.
ReplyDeleteChange the record Ifs!
Delete“Just chucked in a jail” are the lucky ones - others get executed on the spot by the IDF.
DeleteI had a right good laugh at John the Redactor saying Reeves should resign for misleading the public. Reeves did of course mislead the public. Will it make any difference to Scotland if she resigns - no.
ReplyDeleteThe laugh was due to the fact that Swinney and his old boss Sturgeon have been misleading the public in Scotland for 11 years and counting. Lying comes easily and frequently to that pair of charlatans. The man ( Swinney not the non binary one) has been hiding away incriminating documents for years and redacting the life out of any he has to finally give up so that there is next to nothing in them. Even now after 5 years he is spending public funds on legal fees trying to hide documents the Information Commissioner has declared must be made public.
Not only that, but he was behind the sinking of the Titanic.
DeleteLinks to your claims in the last paragraph please. I'd sure like to read the basis for those. Nothing seems to come up with a quick Google search. You must have great contacts.
DeleteFor crying out loud James start a Patreon, I told you think years ago. You would not be in this position if you gathered even a small band of regular supporters on Patreon. Better late than never. Why would you go behind a paywall when you haven’t even given Patreon a shot first? The chances of making any income from a YouTube channel that small is non existent, that is a non starter. There are folks with hundreds of thousands of subscribers who don’t make a living from it
ReplyDeleteI have checked the average earnings on YouTube per 1000 views from multiple different sources, and it does not tally with what you're saying. The problem, as I pointed out in the blogpost, is that there is huge variation on either side of the average, and the only way I can find out which side of the average I'll end up on is by actually giving it a try.
DeleteI'm also not trying to make "a living" from it. I'm simply trying to supplement my other sources of income to the point where it's sustainable to continue. Essentially I'm trying to replace what I would otherwise be raising from fundraisers, or at least get vaguely close to doing that.
Ifs - have I ever mentioned Nicola Sturgeon before in my posts? Still you all know fully support independence….. loud guffaws heard across Scotland
ReplyDeleteIFSy is on a mission, fuelled by his unique blend of ignorance and stupidity. Clearly clueless as to the real numbers and issues involved in the trial by jury system down south, and still pedalling the redactor man patter that he has used for years. Now if he could redact his own contributions on here?
ReplyDeleteHauf pint, post Budget poll fae Focaldata. Westminster voting intention, field work 26 - 28 Nov, sample population 1,343.
ReplyDeleteUK headlines; RefUK 9% lead, Labour holding at 20%.
There’s an emerging trend, Farage’s fortunes are on the decline.
Scottish sub-sample (115) for what it’s worth.
Lab 12.6%, Con 5.3%, LibDem 14.6%, RefUK 17.7%, Green 5.7%, SNP 31.3%.
Away and vote unionist, numpty.
ReplyDeleteYou must try and grow into maturity. John Swinney is the First Minister of Scotland and your continual hatred of Nicola Sturgeon is not only wrong but tiresome as we approach 2026.
ReplyDelete“ As we approach 2026” what relevance is this. So was it ok as we approached 2025?
DeleteJames I'm pretty sure with Substack subs you'd get more than you do with the fundraiser.
ReplyDeleteI'm not one for watching Vlogs, but I've subscribed to help monitise you, I still hope you post some text from time to time, because I do enjoy reading your posts - even if I don't agree with everything you say
ReplyDelete