Below is my video response to the despicable comments that have been made by Netanyahu sympathisers in the mainstream media, and on social media, suggesting that anyone who marches for Palestinian rights, or who supports Palestinian statehood, or who calls the genocide what it is, is somehow responsible for the atrocity in Manchester.
With less than three months of the year to go, the 2025 Scot Goes Pop fundraiser is still short of its target figure. If you'd like to help keep the lights on during the several months it will take me to find out whether an alternative funding model is viable (realistically it could be a wait of around four months or more), card donations are welcome HERE. Or, if you prefer, direct donations can be made via PayPal. My PayPal email address is: jkellysta@yahoo.co.uk
Many thanks to everyone who has donated so far.
Zionists will hijack any act of anti Jewish terror to further their own ethnosupremicist ideology. These people are utterly shameless. We have become accustomed to Netanyahu and his ilk twisting any criticism of the excesses of their racist, colonial agenda into false charges of antisemitism, up to and including the bizarre, medieval charge of “blood libel”.
ReplyDeleteToday, Zionist sympathiser to his core, Foreign Secretary David Lammy is heckled at a vigil merely for his (reluctant) part in recognising the Palestinian State. Zionists have zero shame. They play an all or nothing game. Having set the agenda for years, they are about to reap the whirlwind. They have played all their cards, and they will walk away from the table with nothing.
Lammy is no longer Foreign Secretary. It's the previous daftie Home Secretary Cooper who is now Foreign Secretary. I hope to see them all up before the ICC some day.
DeleteIf Israel were a violent woman -
ReplyDelete'I saw a woman belting the life out of a young child in a play park. I said, "Stop hitting that little child." She turned round and screamed, "Mysogynist!".'
The current daftie who holds the position of U.K. Home Secretary states it is unBritish to protest against a genocide. That's fine by me because like the majority in Scotland I don't feel the least bit British. If being British means you have to accept a genocide then I am happy I ain't no Britnat.
ReplyDeleteBoycott everything with the union flag on it because ( among many reasons) hiding behind it is the Israeli flag.
Britnats like KC have always had the blood of Palestinian children on their hands and now we have their Home Secretary confirming it. Westminster politicians are not nice people - the evidence is overwhelming - they see Israel as an ally. An ally that blows children to bits each and every day of the week and have been doing so for two years. Israel kill the unborn, the newborn baby, the infant children, the five year old children, the 10 year old children and older children. No atrocity is beyond these people. No law they will not break and Starmer and Sunak are complicit.
“……….like the majority in Scotland I don’t feel the least bit British “
DeleteYes. The majority of Scots, all decent Scots anyway, are ashamed to be British.
Well said, and very movingly put.
I've read many junk posts and crass idolatry of Sturgeon posts on WGD over the years so It was a very pleasant change to read this post from Capella:
ReplyDelete" Great to see the polls consistently pro YES. I've been listening to the arguments of the Liberation Scotland group in Geneva. There is no doubt in my mind that Scotland is indeed a colony, there is no such place as " Britain " or the "UK". These are fictions disguising the fact that we are ruled over by Greater England. Siphoning off our resources and removing our capacity to manufacture vital resources - Grangemouth - is exactly what a colonial power does. Ask India.
Speech to the UN decolonisation committee in Geneva 15 mins.
Geneva Prof Alf Baird Speech. "
I challenge any reader of SGP to listen to Baird's speech on YouTube and say where he is materially wrong.
I've said it before and I'm saying it again your chance of a solving a problem is enhanced when you fully understand the nature of the problem. Scotland, like it or not, and there is no doubt England likes it, is England's colony. I don't like it!!!!
Identifying where Alf Baird is materially wrong has never proved particularly hard before. I'll take a look when I have a minute.
Delete11.09pm you’ll need at least 15mins.
DeleteFrom the Scottish Government's own website.
Delete" The Scottish Government believes that restrictions on Scotland's ability to decide to do things differently, even within devolved areas, along with the continued unwillingness to accept Scotland's right to decide its future, suggest that the Union is not the equal or voluntary association of nations it has been claimed to be."
Typical weak words from the SNP Scotgov.
" suggest"!!!!! If it's not the voluntary union then what is it then???? No answer from the SNP.
And what was that great purpose that they argued for vociferously and actually threw their full weight behind? What was the most important thing they thought Scotland should do differently?
DeleteToilets
There is not even a remote possibility of the U N declaring that Scotland is a colony. Undergraduate politics. Perhaps the outcome of this will, in due course, embarrass idiot for Scotland enough to send him into hiding. I will be back on here when the process has run its course and I am proven to be right. I will refer back to this post when I do so. Will IFS refer back to his, or will the U N join the very long list of people and bodies that have all, according to IFS, got it wrong?
Delete7.55am - there is nowhere in that post by IFS where he says the UN will declare Scotland is a colony. On the other hand your post is a cheap straw man post made by people lacking in integrity. He asked SGP readers to critique Baird’s words, you ignored this, and tried to put your words into the post by IFS.
Deletenothing works till something does
Deletethe idea is to eliminate everything that won't work as quickly as possible
Anon @7.55am you only come “on here” when IFS posts and it’s usually to troll him and misrepresent what he said. Other than that you contribute zero on SGP.
DeleteIFS is such a whining misogynist baby, if it rained too much he would blame Nicola Sturgeon for it
DeleteGive it a rest ya big wean
Anons at 10.45 and 11.18 doing exactly what they accuse me of doing. Shades of whining Farage among this lot. They don’t like being called out. Cretins, if it’s not just Idiot for Scotland using his anon status. I will not allow him and his wee pals, imaginary or otherwise, to pollute this site with long term lies and nonsense on matters of Independence. Back to WOS for you. The morons there are right up your street. And I suggest you take a night class in practical criticism, as you clearly struggle to understand words beyond their literal and disconnected meaning You are dismissed. Don’t waste your time replying.
DeleteOh well. So far not a great response. An anon says he needs a minute and says nowt.
DeleteI lay out Alf Baird's presentation on what Scotland' s status is along with the the Scotgov's position and ask for opinions. What has happened - a couple of trolls have posted ad hom insults about me and Alf Baird. I can only hope for better in the coming hours.
The trolls are probably SNP trolls who cannae form an opinion on the subject until the SNP tell them what they should think so they resort to their usual trolling nonsense.
The SNP, a party supposedly for Scottish independence, but they can't say what Scotland's current status is. If Scotland is not in a voluntary union then what is its status? My opinion is that Scotland is England's colony just like Wales. SNP trolls will have to wait till they are told what to think by the SNP. I commend Capella for her independent thinking.
5.23am - the important long term lie is the SNP saying they would hold indyref2.
DeleteHe is a nut job with a fascination with out of date socioliology books by Algerians.
ReplyDeleteIt is gratifying that the cause of Scottish independence is a big tent which can accommodate many different opinions. That would include those who see no issue with the British state, other than its geographical scope. Should the ideology of this otherwise contented faction which disputes only the location of the international border prevail in a democratic, independent Scotland, then we can look forward to:
Delete* Continued involvement in foreign, colonial wars.
* Journalists being arrested under terrorist legislation.
* Covert control by the Permanent State over who gets to stand for election.
* State security apparatus with a £400m budget (pro rata) to spy on its own citizens.
* Manipulation & control of MSM.
* Mass arrests of peaceful protesters under anti terror law.
* False flag operations to manipulate public opinion.
* Foreign intelligence agencies openly meddling in democracy.
And many other delightful features of the British state.
Focaldata, Westminster voting intention, field work 19 Sept - 1 Oct, population sample 2014.
ReplyDeleteUK headline; RefUK 8% lead, +3% on last Focaldata poll mid-August.
Scottish sub-sample (99).
RefUK 26%, Lab 16%, Con 12%, LibDem 13%, Green 4%, SNP 28%.
Data tables are a nightmare, but if I’m reading them correctly, 61% of respondents wouldn’t vote! Are we really living in a functional democracy if <40% of folk can be ersed tae vote?
Back in the 1980's I was part of quite a number of sharp arguments against 'Labour Friends of Israel' in which they always quickly fell back on the 'opposition to Israeli government actions is antisemitic' argument.
ReplyDeleteGiven the chance most people could see that that formula was false. I'm constantly surprised by how effective the false argument has become today among besuited career politicians in the west. Israel acts like other brutal settler states, at the vicious end of that spectrum, and still successfully covers itself with the same tired old lie.
Law must come down like the proverbial ton of bricks on those who commit anti semitic and other racist acts. But the fact that such atrocities happen is no excuse for mass muder and ethnic cleansing by the Israeli state.
“Stephen Watson, the chief constable of Greater Manchester, told The Times that protesters should stay at home in the interests of “decency, humanity, and a bit of sensitivity”.”
ReplyDeleteFunny that, it was “decency and humanity” that prompted me and thousands of others to march through the streets of Glasgow in the pissing rain to protest against the ongoing genocide in Palestine. We ain’t about to stop because some approved asset of the Permanent State thinks two innocent victims of terror in the UK are an equivalent to tens of thousands of murdered civilians in Palestine.
It was a police bullet that killed one of the two victims of the attack in Manchester.
DeleteAbsolutely right in your various comments James.
ReplyDeleteWhat the state of Israel are doing every day in Gaza is a crime against humanity. The killing of men, women and children is the daily occurrence whilst the population is starved of the basic necessities of food, water, shelter and health care. Just look at the pictuures its hell on earth and it is aided and abetted by Sir Keir Starmer and the British government who provide tactical military support, munitions and political cover.
Making people terrorists, for expressing free speech against what is British supported genocide in Gaza tells you exactly what a dystopian murderous regime Britain is.
What happened this week was a tragedy and sad to say but a pimple compared to the suppurating holocaust that is being visited on Gaza.
And now the cry is poor Jews, poor threatened Jews, Britain needs to take a stronger line . And dutifully the Sir Keir Starmer agrees.
I worked for many years in the Middle East with people from all the surrounding countries, Palestinians included. What I learned from this was that these people wanted a safe home, a family, food and education for their families and a peaceful life. So many of them still don't have this because of the intervention of the US and UK governments. Blair is a war criminal and the thought of him having his bloodstained hands in Palestine is outrageous.
ReplyDeleteAs for anti-semitism. I recall hearing an interview on Radio 4 early on in this crisis when a British rabbi stated that the Palestinians deserved what Israel was doing, i.e. attacking men, women and children, who were deemed to support Hamas simply because they were living in Gaza. He supported the actions of the Israeli government without reservation.
I would suggest that the British Jewish population need to stop expressing support for the actions of the Israeli Government in Gaza, and increasingly in the West Bank, against innocent civilians who happen to call these areas home. Those who support the Israeli Government are their own worst enemy.
Grouser
Police in London arrest over 400 people who seem to be elderly and peaceful. Just a question. Would the Police time be better spent chasing actual terrorists?
ReplyDeleteRepublic of Ireland, football Manager, Heimir HalgrÃmsson says Fifa & Uefa should ban the terrorist state from all international competitions.
ReplyDeleteGoing on past precedent this would be a formality, and would have happened many months ago. Countries have been excluded for substantially less. Why the curious exception for the Western, colonialist project?
German sporting goods behemoth, adidas is an Official Partner to Uefa. While the majority of the German public share the same repulsion towards the Zionist state as the rest of Europe, the German elite are oddly beholden the colonial outpost.
Perhaps the solution is obvious? Phrase the Zionist project as racism pure and simple (which it undoubtedly is). For any major, multinational brand to be associated with racism would be a multi billion Euro catastrophe. Sport, and football in particular is an exemplar of racial diversity.
Opinium, Westminster voting intention, field work 1 - 3 Oct.
ReplyDeleteUK headline; RefUK 13% lead, +3% on previous week & a record for Opinium by the same margin.
Scottish sub-sample (127)
Con 8%, Lab 17%, LibDem 5%, SNP 28%, RefUK 27%, Green 12%.
If the Greens are in forth place, ahead of the Tories & the LibDems, I’ll eat me bunnet.
RefUK are already on course for an outright majority at the next UK general election. If today’s poll from Opinium is valid, this could become a landslide.
ReplyDeleteFascist journalist, and partner of RefUK’s deputy leader, Richard Tice, Isabel Oakeshott, had tweeted that she couldn’t possibly be considered a Somali if she were born in Somalia. The inference is obvious; you can’t be British if you’re not white. This is how racism and Fascism works its way insidiously into “polite conversation”. The idea is seeded by a deniable source and left to take root.
The hypocrisies of Tice are legend. He preaches “patriotism” but prostrates himself at the feet of Israel at every opportunity. He wraps himself in the Union Jack, but lives in Dubai. He is an ostensible champion of free speech, but vocally calls for the banning of that very thing. His latest outburst:
“Reform UK calls for the Armistice Day Free Palestine and related marches to be banned in the UK next weekend. This should be enforced by all means necessary. Anyone attempting to defy the ban is liable to be fined and any foreign nationals will have their visas permanently revoked on the basis they do not respect our British customs, values and way of life.”
What does he mean when he says “… all means necessary.”? Thankfully he has no control over this at present. Heaven help us all if the reigns of power ever fall into his hands.
I see the Home Secretary is to give Police more powers to disrupt legal procession as and protests. This poses a problem for the OO. Do they agree or can they be labelled by labour as un-British!
ReplyDeleteThis will be an interesting one. The marches are undoubtedly sectarian and the levels of drunkenness and offensive language and behaviour wouldn’t be allowed in any other circumstances. The legislation will be tested to its limits. There could be an interesting legal argument on the supremacy of legislation over the right to protest. Law students doing a thesis take note.
Delete“Home Secretary Shabana Mahmood told the BBC's Sunday with Laura Kuenssberg programme the move was not a ban on protests but "about restrictions and conditions".”.
ReplyDeleteThis is semantics. Later in the text: “This will include powers to ban protests outright, the government said.”.
The British state is a Spookocracy.
Your timely reminder that Keir Starmer’s first Chief of Staff in Downing Street spent the nineteen eighties pulling pints in the Cove Bar, Newry, County Armagh. Nothing suspicious there.
Isn’t this just part of the same argument to stop the strife across the Middle East, Africa , Ukraine etc to prevent refugees and others wanting to live in peace trying to escape. Until Syria, Lennon, Iraq, Palestine, Iran, Yemen, Sudan …….are in peace people will want out. In a smaller scale we saw many northern Irish folks come to our shores to escape the sectarianism and “troubles”. Also this brings economic stability and folks ability to look free their children and families.No different from the rest of us. How many Scots left to get jobs in London etc as opportunities were closed here.
ReplyDeletePressure, not 'pressurise', please. They are not a gas.
ReplyDelete"pressurise" as in coerce is correctly used in the article.
Delete