Well, let's face it, Stew doesn't really do open debate. He's much more of a fan of monologues in which he gets to call people "c**ts" without them being able to answer back. In fact he almost certainly regretted issuing his 'challenge' to me before I'd even had time to accept it. Believe it or not, I didn't even manage to get an answer out of him to the very first and extremely straightforward question I asked him - which was whether he accepted he had got his sums wrong in claiming that the East Lothian constituency will be a guaranteed SNP hold next year. In the immortal words of Kate Winslet, "well I guess we'll never know..."
But credit where it's due, Stew - as you can see, I expected you to go into a tailspin as a result of someone actually being able to answer back and to revert to type by hitting the block button within mere hours. Ten days of resisting that overwhelming temptation is a hell of an effort by your standards, and we salute you.
Fascinating to learn, by the way, that the notorious Wings blocklist (in which Stew tries to get his cult members to auto-block all of the same people on Twitter that he's blocked) is still going strong after nine years or whatever it is. That all sounds totally normal and well-adjusted.
Tragically, it looks like I'll have to go back to reading through Stew's seven hundred and forty-eight daily tweets about the trans issue without being able to reply. But, on the plus side, that'll leave me more time for breakfast.
Campbell is a total loser
ReplyDeleteStews a clunt
ReplyDeleteCampbell is from the "big girl's blouse" school of debating, and he's demonstrated that yet again. Kudos to you for trying, James.
ReplyDeleteJames, now that you've seen off Stuart Campbell, maybe you could debate Colette Walker on the subject of tactical voting?
ReplyDeleteGood idea. Unlike Stu she'd at least attempt to answer the questions.
DeleteThat would be interesting to read.
DeleteI suspect that was an easier victory than James expected, but you can only defeat what's in front of you, and Campbell barely even showed up.
ReplyDeleteAgreed, but it would be good to see James debate someone who won't run away and who is actually capable of putting forward the arguments confidently and defending them.
DeleteWe don't learn anything from these walkovers.
Oh I don't know. We certainly learn something about Campbell and his cowardice.
DeleteTrue.
DeleteThis is why Campbell always refuses to go on TV and radio. If he can't 100% control the environment, he falls apart. I think he briefly thought an X debate might be all alright because he could whip up the hordes to shout James down, but even that didn't work.
ReplyDeleteI didn't see the debate, but it sounds like it was game, set and match for Scot goes Pop!
ReplyDeletePretty much, although Campbell just refused to engage. Eventually he couldn't take any more and begged ChatGPT to declare him the winner! It was so embarrassing that I hardly knew where to look.
DeleteJesus.
DeleteIn all seriousnnessm, Mr Campbell is not well. What might be useful to him is a period of quiet until he can get the help he needs. Although whether he would accept any help offered to him, one hesitates to say.
DeleteIn Robin McAlpine's article - The Scottish Government needs to act over Israel he says:-
ReplyDelete" It (the SNP) continues to fund arms companies which supply Israel so no kinds of sanctions."
If true, and I believe it is, then just how do SNP members who hold strong views that Israel is committing war crimes, genocide and ethnic cleansing reconcile their membership with their strongly held opinions on Gaza. Is your membership more important to you than thousands of children being massacred?
Or is it another time to stick your head in the sand. Wheest for the SNP.
Give specifics please of the nature and extent of the S Funding or
DeleteF
Previous comment posted half complete. Please give specifics on the S G funding of arms companies. Which companies are they funding and how much.
DeleteI commend James for allowing my post to pass through his moderation. The news that the Scotgov was supporting an arms manufacturer in Scotland who supplied parts for arms sent to Israel was widely reported early in the Gaza genocide.
DeleteThe point is what sanctions have the Scottish government tried to place on Israel other than Angus Robertson having cosy chats with their officials/ambassador. Sure Yousaf has spoken out in the past against the genocide and I commended him for doing so early on but is that enough?