Saturday, June 25, 2011

North Ayrshire Labour councillor thinks that Scotland should be forced to stay in the United Kingdom even if the majority vote for independence

In grasping for ways to thwart the democratic self-determination of the Scottish people, the fundamentalist unionist tendency have already test-driven the 'UK-wide vote' wheeze and the 'two referendums' wheeze, with conspicuously little success on both occasions. It was only a matter of time before someone completed the set by seizing the mantle of George Cunningham and deciding they may as well stop faffing about and just get on with rigging the ballot itself. Dear old friend of this blog, the mysteriously bashful "Braveheart" of Councillor Alex Gallagher fame, had this to say in a recent post -

"It therefore seems unacceptable that the currently effective governance of the country could be overturned by a simple majority of Scots voting in a one-off referendum.

If the turnout at a referendum was at the same level as recent elections, a 51% vote in favour of independence would need the actual votes of less than a third, maybe even a quarter, of the electorate. This is no basis to create a new country. If the referendum is to go ahead there must be a threshold - two-thirds of votes cast or 45% of the electorate, or some similar substantial proportion – that would secure the acquiescence of the minority in the upheaval implied by breaking up the UK."


Two-thirds of the votes cast? I never agreed with George Robertson about much, but I wholeheartedly agreed with him in 1996 when in unveiling the devolution referendum he declared that never again should the will of the people in a constitutional referendum be overturned by a "fancy franchise". What Councillor Gallagher is suggesting is that 66% of people could vote Yes to independence and 34% could vote No, and the result would be ignored. It's a phrase I've used before, but that isn't self-determination, it's a hostage situation.

Incidentally, isn't it curious that Councillor Gallagher, a self-styled "sensible, moderate, fellow, who thinks that the Tories have the wrong recipe for a decent society" is quite happy to enthuse about the status quo of Tory rule from London as "effective governance"? Indeed, he's so sure of himself on the latter point that he arrogantly thinks that even if a majority of Scots take a diametrically opposite view on the "effectiveness" of London Tory governance, their views should be taken no account of whatsoever. It's also worth pointing out that the Welsh Assembly was established after a 50.3% - 49.7% vote in favour, on a turnout of roughly 50% - does Councillor Gallagher think that the current Labour administration in Cardiff Bay is an abhorrence that is getting in the way of "effective" Tory governance from London? I can only assume he must do.

6 comments:

  1. "This is no basis to create a new country." Eh? New? Scotland?

    ReplyDelete
  2. Scotland should force Councillor Gallagher's genitalia into a vice until a POP sound is heard!

    ReplyDelete
  3. when the unionists jobs are at risk from independance they can only resort to putting this country down and making up complete nonsense about how we need to have two referendums or none or try and come up with hurdles to stop independance because they hope that we beleive it and when people think its too long a process they won't vote because really they don't have an argument for the union or against independance everything they say gets disproven and what amazes me is after they still peddle the same lie to another audience and hope nobody realises they will tell you anything to keep there luxury lifes in London and the unionist councillors do it to get a slice of the pie one day for being so loyal think independent Scotland won't have MPs in London Scottish labour won't exist because they aren't Scottish they are registered as the labour party in Scotland, the Tories enough said, lib dems dragged down the Tory sewar. recent independent GERS reports contridict everything about Scotland being too poor too wee and too stupid to survive and shows we are better independent!

    ReplyDelete
  4. I have never agreed with Alex Gallagher's letters in The Herald, so this doesn't surprise me.

    Moving the goalposts as usual. It would be refreshing if they just got down to the business of justifying their side of the debate in an open and honest manner, without all the usual Unionist trickery.

    I smell fear in the Unionist ranks! And as one of our own countrymen, John Paul Jones, once said to the Brit Nats when facing defeat during the American War of Independence: "I have not yet begun to fight!" We could also use the words of American, Patrick Henry, during the same war: "Give me liberty, or give me death!"

    Alex Gallagher, we are going to defeat you, come what may, and we will not stop until it is done!

    ReplyDelete
  5. "I smell fear in the Unionist ranks!"

    Absolutely - we're repeatedly told that "will Scotland vote for independence?" is a "question to which the answer is no" - so why the need for all these shenanigans?

    ReplyDelete
  6. They got away with it the last time and who's to say they won't again?

    ReplyDelete