Sunday, April 20, 2025

ALBA CLUEDO EASTER SPECIAL - Damning *audio* evidence of Tasmina Ahmed-Sheikh's ties to Reform UK is leaked to The Sun, leaving Alba members up and down the land with just one question on their lips: HAS "MAD DOG" GONE FULL TONTO?

Let's imagine, and of course I'm speaking purely hypothetically here, that there was until recently a rogue employee within the Alba Party.  Let's imagine he had full access to the secretive meetings of the party's ruling National Executive Committee (NEC) - not because he was an elected member of the NEC himself, but because the nature of his job allowed him to attend all of the meetings.  And let's suppose he did something just a little bit naughty by secretly recording all of the meetings without the participants' knowledge, just in case it proved useful later on.

Now let's suppose something changed for our hypothetical rogue employee.  Maybe he was sacked, for example, and it left him with a severe grudge against the party.  Maybe he even found himself facing disciplinary action and possible expulsion from the party.  Can you guess how he'd react in that situation?  Might he pass an excerpt of one of those NEC recordings to a tabloid unionist newspaper?  Might he choose a particularly damaging excerpt, not because the damage serves any real purpose in itself, but as a form of implied blackmail - ie. to indirectly let the Alba leadership know that he has all of these recordings in his possession, and that if they don't back off from expelling him, pretty much any unwise comment that was ever made by anyone in any NEC meeting over the last four years is likely to end up on the front page of The Sun?

How fortunate that all of the above is such a fanciful scenario and that it couldn't possibly happen in the real world.  Mind you, it does have to be said that yesterday we discovered that Alba's disgraced former General Secretary, Chris "Mad Dog" McEleny, had been officially suspended from the party, and then today an audio recording from an NEC meeting in which Tasmina Ahmed-Sheikh made private comments revealing her close ties to Reform UK's deputy leader Richard Tice, mysteriously found its way to The Sun.  It also has to be said that McEleny has a long track record of leaking confidential information to unionist newspapers in an effort to harm his Alba colleagues.  But I'm sure that's all just a complete coincidence and that we shouldn't be reading anything into it.

Personally, I think the leaker to The Sun, "whoever that person may be", "what a total mystery this is", etc, etc, is misjudging human nature.  I think now that the disciplinary proceedings are actually underway, blackmail will prove relatively ineffective.  It might have been more effective before the Alba leadership went public with the breakdown in relations with this individual, but now that they've already charted a course, they're unlikely to be deflected from it.  The disgruntled employee's "nuclear deterrent" has already failed, and now all he can do is decide whether or not to fire off his retaliatory missiles just for the sheer hell of it.

And I suspect he might just do that.  Vladimir Putin once made a chilling comment about the circumstances in which he would order the use of Russia's nuclear weapons.  He said that as a Russian citizen he couldn't see the purpose of the world continuing to exist if it didn't have Russia in it.  I think Chris McEleny has reached a similar conclusion.  I think he believes there is no point in the Alba Party continuing to exist if Chris McEleny isn't a member of it, or indeed if Chris McEleny doesn't have a very senior role within it.  I think he has more less set his mind on destroying Alba - although of course for presentational reasons he'll carry on pumping out his usual fare of tedious supportive tweets, in the hope that his hand won't be seen to be on the knife.

As someone suggested on the previous thread, Alba's Cold War may have just gone hot - and the battle that follows might well finish the party off for good.

A couple of other fairly obvious observations about all of this.  The initial complaint against me that eventually led to my expulsion from Alba (which was almost certainly cooked up by Chris Cullen and Shannon Donoghue, but was nominally fronted by Hamish Vernal) related to a supposed "breach of the confidentiality of a committee meeting".  And yet the blogpost in which that breach was alleged to have occurred was an extremely generalised piece which, as you can see, didn't reveal anything at all about what had happened at any committee meeting.  Can you imagine what the reaction would have been if I had actually made a recording of the meeting and given it to a unionist newspaper?  The Alba elite would have gone absolutely berserk.  Well, somebody has just done the equivalent of that, and that person ("who could it possibly be?", "totally baffling", etc, etc) should realise that they've made their own expulsion utterly inevitable, and that their past status won't protect them.

Secondly, the content of the leaked recording makes Tasmina Ahmed-Sheikh, and indeed Alex Salmond, look a bit delusional, because for some bizarre reason they clearly thought the Alba Party, which has been a catastrophic electoral failure throughout the four years of its existence so far, had something to offer the relatively successful Reform UK in terms of strategic advice.  That doesn't come as a major surprise to me, because when I was on the Alba NEC in 2021-22, I saw Alex Salmond make comments about how he thought there was strong evidence the party was firmly on course to win list seats in 2026, and I could tell from his body language and his tone of voice that he genuinely believed it.  It's one thing making comments like that for public consumption to keep morale up, but when you're actually starting to believe your own propaganda, it's a bit concerning.  

The Alba leadership have been stuck in the bunker for a long, long time now.

46 comments:

  1. ALBA should just disband.

    ReplyDelete
  2. Is this another example of Salmond bad judge of character? That Chris guy isn’t that clever .

    ReplyDelete
  3. Make no mistake about it, Alba would rather support the Reform party in Holyrood, rather than the SNP.

    They are like two rancid peas in a pod.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Yup. Hard to deny now we've seen Tasmina's remarks.

      Delete
  4. I think you are being far too simplistic. Who benefits from this leak?. Why, The newly appointed Director of Operations who now doesn’t have to worry about Chris aka Mad Dog winning his case and getting his job back.
    The DoO will have access to the tapes of the meetings

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. That doesn't make any sense to me. The Director of Operations is Corri Wilson, who is known to be a close ally of Tasmina Ahmed-Sheikh. In fact she almost certainly owes her position to Tasmina Ahmed-Sheikh. Why would she leak information that primarily harms Tasmina Ahmed-Sheikh? Where's the benefit to herself?

      Delete
    2. It’s a falling out amongst thieves

      Delete
  5. Most rational Independence supporters will now be in absolutely no doubt that the best route for protecting Scotland's future is to vote for the SNP in all constituencies and also on the list in 2026.

    ReplyDelete
  6. Didn't think I'd be saying this but Anon 12:51 probably has it right.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Yes, but it needs a total Independence manifesto, not a pocketful of mumbles such are promises.

      Delete
    2. All lies and jest
      Still a man hears what he wants to hear
      And disregards the rest, hmm
      ;-)

      Delete
  7. Alt Clut, I agree. Sometimes events unfold so strongly that it's almost as if they was pre determined. As if in 2021 Sturgeon had assembled a crack unit of SNP ultras to infiltrate Salmond's fledgling party and corrupt it from within, to prove that the SNP is the only way.
    Nonsense obviously, but as 12.51 anon says, that is the outcome of the ALBA project, whether it was intended or not.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Don’t kid yourselves that the SNP will change its spots and win us independence. They’ll pivot to being the most anti-Farage party of the bunch, and in so doing will do everything they can to strengthen devolution. All the way till the point when PM Farage is elected and they’re faced with the consequences of their choice.

      Delete
    2. Yes that is a probability. It's our best chance but it will take a hard fight within the party with no guarantee of success.

      Delete
  8. John Swinney has definitely got this. Whether you want a mor equal Scotland or just want help making ends meet the SNP are the only party that can make a better Scotland happen. A good man.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. 1. He needs to apologise to the gender critical who were ostracised and called silly names by the SNP. So far he's still very much one-sided and totally blinkered on that issue.

      2. He needs to recognise that so far at least Reform UK are a valid political party in a democracy, and tread very carefully with his "cross-party summit" against the "far right" which could easily be seen as anti-democratic - which wouldn't be a good look.

      Reform UK need to be beaten at the ballot box, and that is better done by restoring faith in politicians and parties - in our case the SNP. With so many standing down in 2026 they have a chance for a refresh, and need to take it.

      Delete
    2. The SNP have been clear in their support of the marginalised and many in the LGBTQ+ including trans rely on the SNP. John Swinney will not change course in supporting the marginalised. Many who attack trans people are far right.

      The SNP is opposed to Reforms type of politics which is alien to Scotland. Its only right that he stand with other parties against them. Scottish people do not hold the values of the far right.

      Delete
    3. YIR2. On your first point I think we all know an apology is politically impossible for Swinney without alienating many on the far left in his party who still hold considerable sway and are very vocal.
      On the second point, I agree completely. The SNP needs to learn from Reform's rise in England. Those who like to convince themselves that things are different Scotland beware. Most of Reform's recent surge has been down to a general rejection of the political establishment, and the SNP are very much the political establishment. Reform are currently purging themselves of their most 'colourful' members towards a more centre right, professional party. They will inevitably become a more attractive option for some Scots who will feel further pushed away by the SNP if Swinney excludes Reform from his convention. Farage will be running his hands.

      Delete
    4. Anon at 8.51pm says " It's only right that he ( Swinney) stand with other parties against them". So the SNP are standing with the Tories and Labour. What's next a new Bute House agreement but with the Tories!!!!! The destestable and despicable Tories as the SNP used to call them.

      It's incredible what these SNP party drones will accept from the SNP leadership.

      Jakey at 9.35am. Swinney is hardly going to invite Reform as the whole point of the convention is to demonise Reform. The UK establishment parties are worried about Reform. Hence Swinney calling his get together.

      Delete
    5. ifs - the drone that works without batteries

      Delete
    6. And what will his get together do for independence, do you guys think?

      Unity against Reform is a great excuse to ditch it for another term. Just as Swinney’s always wanted.

      Delete
    7. Anyone who believes that Reform are being 'demonised' really needs psychiatric help.

      Anyone who believes Reform are being 'demonised' has NOTHING in common with the vast majority of the Yes Movement or their values.

      Obvious, isn't it.

      Delete
    8. David , nice to see you are trolling me as David this morning rather than the ignorant, illiterate anon troll you often use.

      No it is not obvious. Why not explain yourself?

      Delete
    9. Important Q: If Swinney is able to hold a cross-party summit to prevent the rise of the far-right... why isn't he able to hold a cross-party Constitutional Convention for independence?

      Wouldn't focusing on indy have the side effect of combating the rise of the far right anyway but showing that the only Reform Scotland needs is independence?

      Delete
    10. Anon at 8.51am - do these marginalised people include those who carry signs saying terfs should be beheaded and JK Rowling should be burnt at the stake as a witch.

      Also who or what are the + sign is it not disrespectful to refer to anybody as a mathematical sign.

      Delete
    11. @Jakey Smell
      Swinney might want to wonder about the more than half his members who left; and wonder if they were driven out by the small handful of very very noisy and aggressive misanthropes, most of whom are not transgender, who propelled the SNP from 47 MPs to a handful at 9 last year.

      Some of whom can be seen posting as "Anonymous" on these very pages. And the naive innocent gullible fool apologises to them for some odd reason ...

      ... and even now have SNP support far less than support for Independence. Something which should be hitting him between the eyes like a four by two. Boioioing!

      Delete
  9. John Swinney mentioned the other day on the radio that he is considering to bring out a pro independence initiative in Jan 26.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Fantastic news.

      Delete
    2. The timing could be relevant as there will be elections shortly after. Watch this space.

      Delete
    3. We live in exciting times.

      Delete
    4. Exciting times indeed.
      The prospect of independence is becoming very real.

      Delete
    5. Initiatives have that effect.

      Delete
    6. Nice neat 15 min intervals between your last three posts anon. Much tidier than your previous two posts.

      Delete
  10. Anyone got an archive copy of the Sun article?

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. I posted a direct link in the blogpost. And if you check the link, it's almost certainly already been archived by someone - most Sun articles are.

      Delete
  11. yi2 - Swinney doesn't need to apologise to the right wing theologians who believe that bigotry, homophobic, sectarian and misogynist behaviours (take your pick) are acceptable in a Scotland of 2025.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. 10.20am - he is just having a cosy meeting with them instead.

      Delete
    2. And turn his back on biological women.

      Delete
    3. Anon at 10.20 epitomises the faction that infiltrated and have so badly damaged the SNP. Just go away. Your concocted grievances have had their day. Go form your own party.

      Delete
    4. Anon at 10:20 AM

      Biological women represent slightly more than 50% of the population of Scotland. Few of them are "right wing theologians who believe that bigotry, homophobic, sectarian and misogynist ..." except in the eyes of a self-righteous blonkered few.

      Delete
  12. Don't worry, Kenny McAskill says Alba will build on the strategy of Alex Salmond
    So Devo Max again

    ReplyDelete
  13. I have absolutely no doubt that had Alex Salmond lived Alba would have won seats in 2026. It may still do so even without him. He was in a position to give strategic advice not on the basis of Alba’s performance but on the basis of his evident political genius, which may well have seen him repeat the extraordinary feat of bringing a party from the margins into power.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Delusional. Alba had no chance of seats, with or without Salmond.

      Delete
  14. The sun articl also shows that Alec Salmond was implicated

    ReplyDelete
  15. Seems that Saint Salmond had feet of clay just like everyone else.
    Saint no more.

    ReplyDelete
  16. Salmond was just another politician who could lie for a living when he wanted to.

    They are all the same in that way.

    ReplyDelete