Wednesday, February 5, 2025

BREAKING: Chris McEleny is fired as General Secretary of the Alba Party for "gross misconduct" after his hapless coup attempt ends in total catastrophe, both for himself and the party as a whole - which has now entered a state of outright civil war

As his idol across the water would have said in his Apprentice days: "Christopher, you're fired."

I hate to say "I told you so", but none of this would have happened if the Alba top brass had simply listened to the "wee gang of malcontents" - not just me, but so many others as well who have either been expelled or driven out of the party by bullying.  None of the chaos that Chris McEleny has unleashed within the party in recent weeks would even have been possible if our calls for internal democratisation and for reform of the Kafkaesque disciplinary procedure had been heeded.  McEleny has only been able to act with such impunity because of Alba's toxic authoritarian culture, which has allowed the constitution to be breached and party officials to exceed the limits of their powers again, and again, and again.

Technically the situation now is that McEleny is "suspended" from his position of General Secretary, so theoretically he could return if the disciplinary proceedings work out in his favour, but clearly that is not going to happen.  Make no mistake - he has been fired by Kenny MacAskill and that's an end to it.  There is no way back for him as General Secretary, and there is no way back for him in any form whatsoever within the Alba Party.  If you launch a coup against your own party leader (even an acting leader), you have to get it right within the first five seconds, otherwise you've blown it forever.  

McEleny's dreams of acting as the éminence grise for an Ash Regan-led Alba, and of becoming an Alba list MSP next year, now lie in tatters.  He is extraordinarily ambitious and is highly unlikely to abandon his personal goals even at this stage, but to fulfil them he's going to have to join another party - which leads me to the inexorable conclusion that he will strongly consider renouncing independence in order to join Reform UK, because that is the only party he could plausibly join which would offer him a realistic chance of winning a seat at Holyrood.

This episode must finally put an end to the ludicrous pretence from the MacAskill faction of the party that Alba has been functioning as a normal political party over the last eighteen months.  McEleny was the driving force behind numerous malicious expulsions and lengthy suspensions - not just me, but also Geoff Bush, Sean Davis, Denise Somerville and Colin Alexander.  All of those spurious "upheld complaints" should now be overturned and apologies issued, and anyone who wishes to rejoin Alba should be allowed to do so.  That includes the larger list of people who McEleny falsely certified as having "publicly resigned from the party" in order to bypass the disciplinary machinery altogether.  I've rejoined the SNP since my expulsion and am extremely happy with that decision, but I believe the others are for the most part politically homeless at present.  That is totally unfair on them and a dreadful injustice should now be put right.

I can't help but raise a rather ironic smile at the revelation that a specific component of the "gross misconduct" charge against McEleny is that he gave the impression that Alba supported the Tories in their bid to deprive asylum seekers of free bus travel.  Er, didn't I raise concerns on this blog at the time that McEleny was flirting with far-right rhetoric and that Alba consequently risked mutating from its social democratic roots?  And wasn't I shouted down and ridiculed for that by Alba HQ's Robert Reid, known to be a strong MacAskill supporter?  If you're reading this, Robert - what total hypocrisy on your part.  Total hypocrisy, and you should hang your head in shame.

I was speaking last night to some former Alba members, and I said to them that there was a strange paradox about McEleny.  Most of us had sat in committee meetings with him at some point or another and seen how he remains completely calm and collected when he sticks the knife in.  He never raises his voice or shows any emotion.  You'd think such a man would have brilliant tactics to match his icy temperament, but that's where it all falls apart - his cunning plans are all Baldrick-like and invariably blow up in his face.  Did he really not foresee that absolutely everyone would work out within two seconds that he was the "disgruntled senior employee" quoted by the Sunday Mail briefing against Mr MacAskill?  Did he really believe that he would get away with taking bogus "disciplinary action" against the acting party leader - an action I struggle to think of any precedent for in any UK political party?

It was an attempted coup, that's for sure - the idea would have been that Mr MacAskill's leadership bid might prove untenable if he was suspended in some form or another.  But as I've mentioned quite a few times, 75% of the four members of the Disciplinary Committee who voted for my own expulsion in early December were Robert Reid's mum (Jackie Reid), or Robert Reid's girlfriend (Christina Hendry), or Alex Salmond's niece (Christina Hendry again), or directly appointed to the committee by Alex Salmond (both Christina Hendry and Josh Robertson).  The idea that those people were ever going to suspend Kenny MacAskill is just barking mad.  Maybe McEleny thought a temporary suspension pending the disciplinary hearing would be enough to do the trick?  Well, no, that makes no sense, because Mr MacAskill always had enough supporters on the NEC to overturn a temporary suspension.  It was just never going to work.  It was the sort of coup Mr Bean or Frank Spencer would have attempted, and the outcome is utterly predictable to everyone apart from the man himself.


I follow the Moskva
Down to Gorky Park
Listening to the wind of CHA-ANGE
An August summer night
Soldiers passing by
Listening to the wind of CHA-ANGE

Take me 
To the magic of the moment
On a glory night
Where the children of tomorrow dream away (dream away)
In the wind of CHANGE
Mmmmm

209 comments:

  1. Serves him right. He was asking for it.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. The West of Scotland list guy was never elected to any position in ALBA. He was appointed as an employee (think Murray Foote). He has no support within the membership.

      Delete
  2. Kinda like when the four of us kicked Tommy out of our chopper gang in Nairn in 1971. The world shuddered on its axis.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Tommy the BMX Bandit o’ NairnFebruary 6, 2025 at 8:54 AM

      Aye, but you and your sad chopper pals weren’t laughing when I wouldn’t let you into my BMX gang in 1986, were you?! Mwahahaha!

      Delete
    2. I remember. You're evil.

      Delete
    3. Auldearn Tandem Club.February 6, 2025 at 4:00 PM

      You were laughing on the other side of your face when Celine Gottwald and Dolores Inverarity refused to join your clutch of losers and signed up to our friendly group.

      Delete
    4. Away back to the nursery you lot. You are not in the least bit funny - just stupid.

      Delete
  3. Looks like McEleny was suspended before the coup attempt on MacAskill? Looks like when Kenny came into post he understood the issue and god rid of the toxic wee cunt

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Who suspended him and when?

      Delete
    2. @Anonymous it looks like MacAskill suspended him when he became leader

      Delete
  4. Another excellent blog James. Such a problem for the Alba Party apologists on Twitter who have lost touch with reality and still cling to the belief that you and 'the wee gang of malcontents' somehow could have had access to Alba Party internal communications. There are useful idiots and then there are useless idiots.

    ReplyDelete
  5. Watch for McEleny's 'Lisa Cameron Moment' as he states he is "exhausted by nationalism" and slithers into Reform.
    Grubby Wee Git.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. He's certainly shit out of places to go in the Yes movement.

      I wonder if Reform is picky about devout adherence to Our Precious Union, though. A good chunk of their voters are independence supporters, going by the polls and a few I know myself. Sure, the same can be said for Labour, who still haven't driven away their share of the Yes vote, despite years of trying. But we all know the Union only really belongs to the Tory brand, and you can see Labour's extreme discomfort when they're challenged on it.

      The Yes Leavers I know all say they wanted out of Europe for the same reasons as they wanted out the UK. (I don't buy that argument myself, as a Remainer, as we never let Brussels have anything like the power Westminster holds over us, but this is their feeling.) Perhaps Reform's identity as the "take back control party" appeals in a different way than the establishment Brit parties who are really all just "take control back to Westminster."

      Delete
    2. 7.44

      I totally agree and believe this has slipped under the radar for some snp zealots who don't consider the wider independence voting base (ie half the country).

      If you point this out though some people on this site put two and two together and get 5, assuming we actually support Reform. I do not and will not under any circumstances.

      Delete
    3. @8:22

      Aye, I know my share of Yes Leavers, and get where you folk are coming from. I even have some friends in Europe who were excited by both our referendums: "imagine having the chance to vote for INDEPENDENCE," they said, "from EUROPE!" No one offers them the chance in their countries.

      I’m a Remainer myself and still favour Scotland rejoining the EU. We must make it a democratic choice, though. Independence FIRST, then referendums in the first few years of statehood for significant matters like EU membership, NATO membership, and whether to become a Republic.

      I'd also have Citizen's Assemblies work on these things first, and choose the referendum question wording, but you get the idea. Some things are far bigger than political parties. Independence is one of them, but not the only one.

      Delete
  6. The man is a clown . General secretary wouldn’t let him do a run to Greggs .

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Never mind Greggs. A pal o’ ma wife’s new boyfriend says he seen big Chris an’ Peter A Bellend intensely negotiatin’ a heap o’ Big Macs doon at the McDonald’s in Easterhouse. He reckons it wiz jist like Blair an’ Broon at Granita, carvin’ up the future between them. Scotia, ye’ve been warned!

      Delete
    2. Word has it that neither Blair nor Brown ate a bite while negotiating at Granita.

      Our sources tell of a great big McDonalds carry-out box tossed out a steamy plug-in hybrid window at the electric car chargers at The Lochs. The cardboard was "intensely soiled by savoury juices" says the leaker, but not a single chip was left behind.

      Delete
    3. Sources close to the Hon Sarah Smith are permitted to confirm that Baroness Colonel Professor Dr Ruth 'Rape Clause' Davidson partook fully of the fun size portion of sweet n sour chips.

      Delete
  7. It was the same when accounts were accusing NEC members of trying to fix last year’s election. None of the accounts could explain how we could do that.

    Only HQ staff could access the voting data and none of us malcontents were HQ staff. But hey why let logic get in the way of a good smear.

    My best guess as to the reason for the war is Kenny did not want Chris to be returning officer. Now after last year that’s understandable but maybe Chris couldn’t be relied on to fix it for Kenny.

    What ever reason it’s unlikely to be the reason given in the article. So any other guesses?

    ReplyDelete
  8. People who group together to advance their own interests should not be surprised if, when they try to dump one of their number, because his utility has expired, that there will be some comeback. For people with such an exceptional sense of self-entitlement, there always is.

    ReplyDelete
  9. Maybe Alba has a chance now.

    Seemed to me for a long time that McEleny was too much a spokesperson for Alba - he was the general secretary not the leader or president.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. There was a time when McEleny was literally "the face of Alba" at the National. His picture would be on every article about them on the National's website. I assumed it was Alba's way to show they weren't just "a one man band" by featuring other high-ups besides Eck himself. But the key to doing that, surely, is to feature other faces in the plural?

      When word of McEleny's dirty fixing fetish started spreading around, it made a lot more sense to me. The man's not just got ego, he's a control freak without self-awareness or shame. Just like DT.

      Delete
    2. Maybe Alba has a chance......to move their vote up to 3%

      Delete
  10. "Mr McEleny doesn’t think the rules apply to him and when Mr MacAskill decided to apply the rules he simply couldn’t comprehend it."

    Ok - who talked?

    😂

    ReplyDelete
  11. It does seem James was right a out McEleny. I doubt if Reform would have him tho.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. I dunno, he does make a great comedy baddie though. The kind of talent you want when you're running a "spade a spade" kind of comedy party.

      Delete
  12. I want my job back !

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Ye're no gettin' it, Conduct Christopher!

      Delete
    2. Soz Chris, but talk to the hand cus the face ain't listening.

      Over it

      Delete
    3. Corri (mic drop) WilsonFebruary 6, 2025 at 7:59 AM

      Shannon daughter! We could he next!

      Delete
    4. If Alba fall apart I think I could do reely well from merchandising. People envy my lifestyle.
      If someone created a show about my West Coast family then it would be a winner! You can imagine who would emerge as the star of that!
      Are you watching, Z? ;)

      Delete
    5. Corri (Mic Drop) WilsonFebruary 6, 2025 at 9:05 AM

      We could always do our talk show and join unionist parties. Then we can build up a party and ruin it for greed and nepotism.

      Delete
    6. Get a job at McDonalds..it was good enough for Kemi Badenoch !

      Delete
  13. YOUR PATIENCE IS GREATLY APPRECIATED! I NOW HAVE CONFIRMATION FROM TAS THAT MCELENY HAS SHOCKINGLY JOINED THE WEE GANG OF MALCONTENTS! YOU HAVE FULL AUTHORISATION TO LIQUIDATE HIM! DO IT NOW! I AM THE GREAT ZULFIKAR SHEIKH!February 6, 2025 at 1:12 AM

    The most bombastic of night-time greetings to you all, my dearest of friends.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. One word, Zulfs: chills.

      Delete
    2. What's with the 's' at the end of words? Are you a 12 year old Essex girl?

      Delete
  14. How to judge Swinney - or the SNP for that matter? As an example, look at the 2024 General Election campaign. And ask some questions (with my example answers).

    In the SNP manifesto was Independence front and centre, on a page on its own? Well, basically, yes. Which gave some hope the election would be fought on Independence.

    Did the SNP leaflets give great prominence to Independence? No.

    Did SNP politicians as a whole go on and on about Independence? No.

    Did John Swinney, then quite new leader, give Independence prominence? No.

    Did the SNP lose that election badly? Yes. 47 down to 9 MPs, and vote down to 30%.

    Did they accept they did badly? No - it was all the fault of that nasty Mr Starmer.

    Do they now accept they did badly and why? No and no. They say they fought a great campaign, they did well but people were fooled by Starmer and Labour.

    500,000 SNP voters didn't turn out you morons. And I'm being kind and polite.

    So, as I say, judge Swinney by his progress over the next 12 months.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Swinneys leadership has been working well and has been marked with a steady hand.

      Delete
    2. Not only steady but increasingly steady. And his touch has been marked by sureness.

      Delete
    3. YIR2 at 1.16 am - a bit off-topic, no?

      Delete
    4. Yesindyref2 - a factual accurate post spoiled by the last sentence. Judge Swinney by his long history in leadership positions in the SNP and what he does in the next 12 months.

      Delete
    5. Swinney is as unlikely to turn around his career-long reticence on ACTION for independence as the USA is to build a new Miami in Gaza and welcome the Palestinians back to their wonderfully renovated homeland.

      Neither thing is physically impossible, but neither one is the least bit likely.

      Delete
    6. Swinney has been effective as leader and has brought stability. Remember what the SNP was like before his leadership. He has turned it round. John Swinney plans to be SNP leader for many years to come.

      Delete
    7. And to retire as a valued British Subject.

      Swinney's career as chief administrator isn't why we vote, you know? We want out of the union, not to make it run smoother.

      Delete
    8. 9.00am - “ John Swinney plans to be SNP leader for many years to come. “ oh well no independence for many years to come.

      Delete
    9. Here we go. ATTACK the SNP. Maybe it is best for the albanists to continue their wee fight like rats in a sack. What will Regan do now? Allows the rest of us to get on with our life’s and to support independence.

      Delete
    10. John Swinney put independendence line 1 page 1 of SNP manifesto.

      He undoubtedly is leading SNP better than leaders of other political parties in Scotland.

      Delete
    11. Yet John Swinney didnae campaign on it.

      For the first time since I turned 18 and had the vote, I didn't vote for the SNP in 2024. Why not? Because they weren't serious about independence and they needed a reminder that's what they are for.

      "Page 1 line 1 but wheesht" isn't good enough. Melt the media's ears off with the prospectus for independence, NOW. C'mon. It's the whole point of the Scottish National Party.

      Delete
    12. Anon @ 10:42 AM Neither yesindyref2 nor IFS are Alba

      Delete
    13. Agree but we don't have to wait a year to know.

      Delete
    14. His past is history, the future is his – and ours – undiscovered country. We should judge him on the next 12 months. Mercilessly.

      Delete
    15. I see this quickly turned into a hate Swinney hate the SNP diatribe, at this rate independence is not round the corner…..you either want Scotland to be free from the Westminster shackles or carry on with the subservience, with so many commenting here my guess is the latter……we have to get behind one party or it will not happen anytime soon. I don’t need petty unconstructive divisive replies so don’t bother. The time is now to either vote for the largest party in Scotland that are pro independence or forever be chained to England……..SNP🏴󠁧󠁢󠁳󠁣󠁴󠁿🏴󠁧󠁢󠁳󠁣󠁴󠁿🏴󠁧󠁢󠁳󠁣󠁴󠁿🏴󠁧󠁢󠁳󠁣󠁴󠁿🏴󠁧󠁢󠁳󠁣󠁴󠁿🏴󠁧󠁢󠁳󠁣󠁴󠁿🏴󠁧󠁢󠁳󠁣󠁴󠁿….as I said don’t want the poisonous replies, the reason we are not Independent is the division. Join forces, put the pettiness aside and let’s win our country back. Go on you know you want to?

      Delete
    16. Shouldn't it be the reverse approach: The SNP working to win support back by showing that they have a plan to progress independence and are being serious in their intent?

      We were united behind them in multiple elections, gave them mandate after mandate and nothing happened. Why would this time be any different?

      As they say it takes two to tangle. It's not up to the Yes movement to unite behind the SNP, it's up to the SNP to give them a reason to do so again.

      Delete
    17. "I see this quickly turned into a hate Swinney hate the SNP diatribe"

      Should have gone to Specsavers.

      Delete
    18. Anon 12.47pm “ the reason we are not independent is the division “
      Prove it.
      I disagree. The division came because of the SNP and its lies about independence and some of its horrendous policies that were always going to cause division and were probably designed to do so.

      Delete
    19. I find it incredible that some people who acknowledge the division and lack of action on independence expect ( or is it hope) Swinney, the very person who was at the heart of all this, is the person to rectify it.

      Delete
    20. I thought it was supposed to be Sturgeon was at the heart of it all!

      Delete
    21. There's always Alba (titter).

      Delete
    22. As I said…just the usual anti SNP diatribe, but then it is looking more and more like reform are getting your vote, just part time nationalists perhaps? Who knows, who cares, I will continue to fight for Scottish Independence as opposed to the repliers who are happy in their role as “ it’s not my fault, it’s your fault, i’m only happy when I have an excuse to blame everyone else, but have no real answer”. Anyhow the poisonous pens certainly showed themselves up for what they are…….part- time punks. Vote Independence Vote SNP!!! ……………Queue the bollocks from the Scottish haters!!!

      Delete
    23. As the largest pro-indy Party why does the blame for the divisions in the Yes movement never fall upon it?

      It's always everyone else... everything who left the SNP and stopped voting for them are the problem and need to see the error of their ways. The SNP are blameless, have done everything right and deserve unquestionable support!

      Delete
  15. Aaaaaand STILL total silence on the Alba story from "fearless journalist" Stu Campbell. Fearless as ever, I see.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. To be fair to the venerable Reverend, he's never much bothered his arse covering Alba since its inception. Positive or otherwise. Most times he ever mentioned them was in passing, while taking a swipe at their Gaelic name.

      Would he have preferred if Salmond had called it The Wings Party just to please him? Somehow, I doubt even that would have been enough to get Stu back on the independence campaign. He prefers to be against something than being for something. Which is, ironically, just as effective as the SNP's independence strategy.

      Delete
    2. I'm sick of it.sick

      Delete
    3. Won't someone PLEASE listen to Cassandra! She's not mad, she's just mad about men in frocks.

      Delete
    4. Is Cassandra Mr Campbell's camp name? I thought it was Gloriella.

      Delete
    5. Reverend Campbell Lol.

      Delete
  16. Campbell is many things, but a journalist? If he is, he’s a pretty poor one. Cut and paste and woeful comments and predictions. Still, doing ok financially as the muppets continue sending him money.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Doesn't he still have the game industry day-job, too? That's what moved him down to Bath in the first place.

      Delete
  17. It would be a hugely machiavellian move for Reform to take on a smattering of pro independence candidates.

    A rich seam for them to mine.

    A softening of their independence mantra, they've barely mentioned their unionism in fairness, could be a bold move for them.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. If you read between the lines, TalkTV, the Reform supercharged propaganda tool was cosy with Alba.. at least a grudging respect.

      I think this has some legs.

      Delete
    2. The sensible, game theory optimal, way for Reform to operate is to attract as many groups of scunnered voters as possible. And who's more scunnered than us Yessers, stranded for a decade now without a whit of progress?

      Unionism is over-served, already. Nationalism is the open opportunity. And be proud of the word, FFS! There's nothing disgusting or deplorable about Scotland!

      Delete
    3. Fun idea. But, unlike Lord of the Rings, Legolas - sorry, I meant, legless.

      Delete
    4. Lego Lass is built like a split brick house.

      Delete
    5. I like you. I like you a lot.

      Delete
    6. Reform is an ultra-unionist party. Anyone who believes that Reform would assist Indy, needs to give their head a shake.

      Delete
  18. Pure speculation but I wonder what Sloppy Duce Farage might think of offering a foreign policy and defence only 'new union'. The bumbling aimlessness of the SNP leadership on the independence issue could make the nationalist right of the YES vote vulnerable to such a trap.

    We have to stay firm on social inclusion and full sovereignty. Is Mr. Swinney the leader for this ?

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Yes he sure is.

      Delete
    2. 1. John Swinney put independence on the first line of the manifesto.
      2. John Swinney cares about reducing poverty.

      Delete
    3. 3. John Swinney fires the starting gun for Indyref2 (via Holyrood election) in 3…2…1…





      John? You did load it, right?

      Delete
  19. Its time for all to unite behind the SNP. John Swinney is doing a very good job as leader.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Turfing much this morning, Mr. Astro?

      Delete
    2. Anon@9:10,
      Finally somebody on here talking a bit of sense. I’ve been trying to get through to the clowns on here for weeks that the SNP are the BEST political party on these islands by a country mile, and the ONLY party that can lead us to independence.
      Come on ya fanny’s ffs get real. John Swinney is turning things round BIG TIME and is growing in stature by the day. He’s clearly learnt a hell o a lot fae our former great leader Nicola Sturgeon.
      Get a grip folks, I’m fed up reading UTTER PISH on here.
      It has to be the SNP, the ONLY indy party in town.
      Ta.

      Delete
    3. Well said - well argued post 9.30.

      Whatever one's view about the SNP of yesteryear, John Swinney has crafted a new SNP.

      One that we should all be able to unite behind.

      Delete
    4. But one that will lift a finger for independence?

      Go on. What's holding them back?

      Delete
    5. I'm finding it more difficult to tell, is the David Francis @ 9:30 AM the real one?

      Delete
    6. Bloody idiot 9.36am. That’s not the real David Francis and he is taking the piss out of you and you are too dumb to realise.

      Delete
  20. The divisive issues are being discretely sidelined and Swinney handled the recent budget process well. Lib Dem and Green purring contentedly having been given no concrete concessions in reality. The Indy message needs to be gradually increased to peak in the months before the H R election. If that happens I am again voting SNP. Whether I vote green in the list is still not decided as in my area there is a good chance of a green list MSP. The usual doom merchants on here are posting the same negative crap day in day out. If they are that disillusioned why are they here? Events down south should frighten every thinking person. Anyone who thinks of voting Reform is either a nasty fascist or an idiot, or both.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Well argued post.

      Delete
    2. Although I would not endorse the bit about the Green Party.

      Delete
    3. Anon at 9.29. I am still undecided about the greens in my list vote. I am angry at some of their behaviour when they were allowed into positions of responsibility, but if the choice is a nominally pro Indy green and a unionist, I will vote green.

      Delete
    4. The Greens are not a good partner for SNP and are a laughing stock. I recommend both votes SNP

      Delete
    5. The Greens are not a good partner for climate change or ecology at the moment, either. (I gave them my list vote from 1999 to 2016, and my politics hasn't changed one bit.) They're rank incompetents, the worst poster children imaginable for "Woke Capture."

      Delete
    6. The Greens involvement in Government were the root cause for the popularity hit the SNP took. The SNP got all the blame for the sheer amount of incompetence and money jizzed away on policies that never came to fruition. Lorna Slaters past comments on indy not being a red line for her are concerning as well.

      There definitely needs to be a little more consideration than just a numbers game when deciding which way to vote.

      Delete
    7. Any Scottish person who thinks about voting Reform is just plain daft.

      Delete
    8. Any daftie who thinks all Scots are timid social democrats isn't Scottish.

      Delete
    9. I'm the only show in town.

      Delete
    10. is cutting your dick off carbon neutral net zero?

      if transism doesn't fit the green agenda we might have to ban it

      there is also the problematic amount of hydrocarbon based lubricants used in all the lovely buttsex the rainbow crowd love - are they offsetting their sodomy with carbon credits?

      Delete
  21. When Alex Salmond died, someone on this blog said the power struggle to follow would resemble The Death of Stalin.

    They weren't wrong.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. The SNP was being led by John Swinney when Alex Salmond died and there is no power struggle whatever. There is no vacancy for John Swinney's job.

      Delete
    2. Anon at 9.38.:What are you actually saying? Where is the power struggle? Are you actually talking about Alba? In the context of SNP your post makes no sense.

      Delete
    3. What are you talking about? Anon at 9.38 didn't say anything about the SNP. His post "makes no sense in the context of Zippy from Rainbow", but he didn't mention Zippy from Rainbow either. You must have the SNP on the brain.

      Delete
    4. Well argued post. There is no power struggle in SNP as there is no vacancy.

      Delete
    5. The power struggle—and the open blood-letting—is obviously in Alba. What a meltdown! No one expected them to recover from Eck's untimely death, but they're going out with a bang!

      As for a power struggle in the SNP, the rule-change the leadership has put to conference—making membership-led challenges for the leadership impossible—comes from a place of fear. So while things may seem placid now, even the leader's office expects that to change in a big way, going by their actions.

      Delete
    6. "There is no power struggle in SNP as there is no vacancy."

      And with the proposed rule changes to stand for the leadership there never will be until he leaves willingly.

      Delete
    7. Anon at 11.02. When did an outsider ever win a party leadership election?

      Delete
    8. If Swinney snuffed it would that be "The Death Of Stalling"?

      Delete
    9. Anon at 10.28. Read all the post replies before ranting, you silly muppet, or should I say Zippy.?

      Delete
    10. Anon @11:06 AM Then why change the rules if there's no issue?

      Delete
    11. Henceforth, the Leader will be appointed by the Leader.

      Just dotting i's and crossing t's. Nothing to see here…

      Delete
    12. The current leadership rules were devised when SNP was not a party of government.

      Delete
    13. And everyone knows parties of government don't need competitive leadership elections. They need factional continuity. They need coronations.

      The members can stay outside the hall and wave flags.

      Delete
    14. Members elect leaders but appropriate rules are needed.

      Delete
    15. Here's an idea for an appropriate rule: MSPs are legitimate candidates and automatically allowed onto the ballot if nominated. MPs could need an MSP to nominate them, as they're clearly in the wrong parliament.

      The rule change seems designed to deny very well known faces indeed from even standing. Take the last contest for example: Ash obviously wouldn't get on the ballot, but would Kate have?

      Delete
    16. The new rules seem more sensible.

      Delete
    17. Awa' an' bile yer heid! You dinnae deserve a say at all. Let Nicola choose. She's done it twice and she's only getting better!

      Delete
    18. "The current leadership rules were devised when SNP was not a party of government."

      What issues have arisen in the last 18 years? You don't fix something that isn't broken.

      Delete
    19. If it ain't broken: don't rig it.

      Delete
    20. A snag arose when John was installed.

      Delete
    21. We soon discovered the man was bald!

      Delete
  22. I would argue that John Swinney is better than what either Alex Salmond or Nicola Sturgeon became.

    He is a unifying figure something they in the end were not.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. As a long term SNP member I would dispute that. Salmond and Sturgeon were political giants which Swinney isn't. John is a unifier and I agree on that point.

      Delete
    2. I do not endorse the view that John Swinney does not compare favourably to what Salmond and Sturgeon became.

      He deserves a lot of credit for moving the SNP into the good position it is today.

      Delete
    3. A "good" position that is still a good way behind where it was in 2021.

      The man who deserves the credit for the moment is Keir Starmer. Such a generous prime minister to his opponents!

      Delete
    4. Can we crack down on this obvious trolling?

      It's getting tiring how unifying a figure John Swinney is and what a great speech he supposedly made at Conference. It's the same comments on every blog post.

      Delete
    5. Yes a good position.

      Don't forget how difficult it is to remain in executive power for a long time in democratic systems of government - incumbents often become unpopular with voters but the SNP is on a rising tide under John Swinney even after the SNP has been in so many periods of elected office in Edinburgh.

      Delete
    6. Anon at 10.59. It sounds like a bot. But I think J S is doing OK. The big test is coming. I just hope he is up to it.

      Delete
    7. It's just an astro-turfer—amateur or paid—the same one who plagued this comments section with precisely the same high praise for Humza Useless—we called him that before he took up the challenge to prove it beyond a doubt!

      James has written about deleting their comments in bulk, before, and I recall Robin McAlpine describing their relentless lines of phrase as well. "Settling into the rôle, sureness of touch, great speech at conference, we can all agree." One guy typing shite, one guy, one guy, one guy…"

      FWIW, I think Swinney's doing okay at being first minister as well. Where I diverge from optimism is where I think he's taking us. I think his smiley selfies at the "summit of the shires" is more accurate than his "hope" for "democratic decency" from London.

      Delete
    8. Yeah Swinney is probably a good First Minister of a devolved administration as it is today. A keep things stable and 'don't rock the horses' approach. Working constructively with the UK Government, hence why he's all smiles singing deals with the Mayor of London or taking part in Starmers 'Council of the Nations and Regions'.

      But my issue is that he's not a risk taker, doesn't have it in him to do anything bold or take on the British establishment to progress the case for independence. He's more of a Manager rather than a political strategist setting the agenda and outmanoeuvring his opponents. Imo he's being lucky at the moment that everyone else seems to be shooting themselves in the foot.

      Delete
    9. It’s pretty simple. The SNP was founded to deliver Scotland from Westminster control not to administer Scotland on Westminster’s behalf while England helps it to our resources.

      The status quo, stable or not, is unacceptable to independence supporters. We have had 10 years of lies and broken promises from the SNP. Progress independence or come out and admit you are a devolution party. Stop stealing votes on false pretences.

      Delete
    10. Swinney's leadership is marked by a steady hand but that is no bad thing as the SNP needs a period of sensible leadership and the turbulence is not popular with voters.

      Delete
    11. Is independence also "turbulence"?

      The SNP's two things, and that's the problem. It's both the Scotgov *and* the vehicle for independence. Where's the problem? There's a paradox. Government requires stability, while independence requires a profound rupture.

      Which one is the SNP's real purpose? Doing either one requires sacrificing the other.

      Delete
    12. John Swinny correctly argues that the two go hand-in-hand.

      Delete
    13. Stable devolved UK government and smashing the UK in two?

      You can certainly DO one while only TALKING about the other. But you absolutely can't have both together.

      Delete
    14. The two go hand in hand.

      Delete
    15. Naw they dinnae!

      They're as opposed as working *with* Westminster and working to *abolish* it. Independence isn't some next stage "Devo Max", it's bursting out of the UK and leaving London to tidy up their half of the wreckage.

      Delete
    16. John Swinney dealt with this issue in his Glasgow University 2024 speech.

      Delete
    17. I wasn't there. Let me guess, it went a little something like: ultimately they will respect Scotland's democratic wish for independence, as fellow democrats.

      Which is of course the posh way of saying "we'll just keep begging for it, till they're too embarrassed to put up with any more."

      When did that ever work, anywhere on Earth?

      Delete
    18. It is available online.

      Delete
    19. Making devolution work shows the union is working. So how does that help independence. Swinney just wants to do a good job for his London masters.

      Delete
  23. The reality of the situation is that the contest for the Alba leadership between MacAskill and Regan is the proverbial 'two bald individuals fighting over a comb'!

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. If Regan had any sense she would be making overtures to SNP along the lines of Indy being her absolute priority and not knowing the divisive nature of Alba and some of its membership when she crossed over. She knows now.

      Delete
    2. Regan should rejoin SNP.

      Delete
    3. She voted down the SNP budget that one time, as Alba's only MSP, remember. She may have burned her bridges.

      Delete
    4. Regan may then have made a big mistake by leaving the SNP.

      The SNP is now in a better place and is under great leadership.

      Delete
    5. Anon at 10.43. She would undoubtedly need to rebuild bridges, but with the divisive elements within SNP being quietly neutered she could construct a plausible case for rejoining.

      Delete
    6. "She voted down the SNP budget that one time, as Alba's only MSP, remember. She may have burned her bridges."

      Though that was under a different leader and after quite chaotic circumstances.

      It has been quite widely reported that she was involved in constructive talks in relation to the current budget and after the Scottish Government committed to mitigate Labours cut to winter fuel payments and further progress on free school meal expansion she has agreed to support it.

      Delete
    7. "May" have burned her bridges? you're havin a laugh, the woman drank from the Salmond poisoned cup FGS

      Delete
    8. Anon at 12.11. A bit hysterical? Tone down the narrative. Poisoned chalice?? In the real world people disagree then reconcile.

      Delete
    9. Ash should join the NSP !

      Delete
    10. Then she'd be the first ever MSP for a second party. Exciting! She could win a record for the most parliamentary breakthroughs in the world by running through the list…

      New Scotland Party
      Wings Party
      Scottish Libertarians
      Scottish Family Party
      Socialist Workers Party
      UKIP
      Reform UK

      New dawn, new wardrobe, new Ash.

      Delete
    11. Official Monster Raving Loonies (Scotland)
      Monster Munch Loonies (continuity)
      Communist Party of Great Britain (northern branch)

      Delete
    12. Today Ashley Regan is representing Zanu-PF in its surprising breakthrough into Scottish politics. This remarkable situation will however be short lived, as tomorrow she has committed to representing Likud.

      Delete
    13. @anon 12.40pm In the real world people actually do not reconcile, they only forget, and that's how people like Salmond get away with what he did
      Labour are doing it right now

      Delete
    14. Rare words of wisdom in a blog comment. Absolutely right: "reconciliation" is just a face-saving spin on "agreeing to forget." The next time there's any strife, though, those memories return with a vengeance.

      Delete
    15. She could team up with George Galliway. He must have a new political party to help fund his glamour puss lifestyle choices.

      Delete
  24. No , please no! That was an escape

    ReplyDelete
  25. Another tremendously impressive performance by John Swinney at FMQs.
    His stature rises by the week, and he’s certainly got the measure of Sarwar and the Tory t*****.
    Some of the pricks on here who doubted him, are being made to look FOOLS. Anybody that cannae see what a GREAT leader this man has become needs their heads looked at. Get behind John Swinney and the ONLY party that can lead us to INDEPENDENCE ffs.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. John Swinney is popular with voters.

      Delete
    2. But will he, Davey boy? Will he?

      Swinney's not a muppet, like Humza, you're right about that. The opposition parties are all led by diddies, too, which makes life easier for him.

      But the SNP has been the Scotgov now for EIGHTEEN YEARS. That's as long as Thatcher and Major combined. It's a huge stretch of time in politics. I mind leaving school and getting the vote in 1997, and I'd never even lived a single day free from Tory rule. They may as well have been in power forever.

      How much longer does he need to get started on independence? How much longer, Davey? Why not today?

      Delete
    3. Swinney has been clear about his plan: good government as a path to independence.

      Delete
    4. Good stable devolved *British* government.

      All it takes is telling folk that "independence is coming for all that" and you can keep it up forever, apparently.

      Delete
    5. 1.56: your comment was dealt with in John Swinney's Glasgow University speech last year.

      Delete
    6. Anon at 1.56. Feel free to feck off and start your own party.

      Delete
    7. Anon at 1.29. Get on with it then!

      Delete
    8. And you too, Pete Bell!

      Delete
    9. John Swinney was always a good man and has much improved as a politician over the years, people like him and that counts

      Delete
    10. IMPERSONATOR at 1:09

      You REALLY need to up yer wee game, sonny.

      I am MUCH more erudite than your pish.

      Try harder.

      Ta much.

      Delete
    11. Where's YOUR plan, Davey boy? Where'd you put it?

      Delete
    12. Right there in that bucket along with the snows of yesteryear

      Delete
    13. D F at 3.03. If only he could up his game, be more erudite and not talk pish. Something to aspire to.

      Delete
    14. Anon at 2.30. In fairness to Peter Bell I think he does want an Independent Scotland unlike some of the usual suspects on here who are nothing more than sad wee trolls, but for as long as he bangs on about UDI he has no credibility. His website is a bit of a joke as well.

      Delete
  26. Alba was always destined to fail, as anyone who has a basic grasp of the history of the independence movement would have known. Every few years, a vocal minority starts shouting about how not enough progress is being made, that the SNP no longer truly supports independence, and decides to start their own party that will be "serious" about independence. That party then fights a couple of elections, but with no success, and disappears without a trace.

    The SNP has clearly benefited from a group of unhappy campers who were causing friction leaving the party, but it's a shame that so much time, energy and funds have been wasted in the process. Let's hope they vanish entirely before the 2026 election, so that we don't see a few thousand votes being wasted as well.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Alba’s failure wasn’t inevitable, and brushing it off as just another doomed splinter group ignores the real frustrations that led to its creation. A lot of indy supporters have grown tired of waiting with the same old rhetoric being recycled, feeling like the SNP has been treading water rather than pushing forward with a clear, determined strategy. Alba wasn’t just a vanity project or a protest vote—it was a reaction to that frustration, a demand for action rather than just talk. The idea that its existence somehow helped the SNP by “getting rid of troublemakers” completely misses the point. If anything, it highlighted the growing disconnect between the SNP leadership and a part of the independence movement that feels increasingly sidelined.

      Sure, Alba struggled electorally and clearly has its own internal issues, but that doesn’t mean the frustrations that fuelled it have gone away. There’s a real risk that if the SNP keeps dragging its feet, that discontent will build up again, and next time, it might not be so easy to dismiss. Writing off Alba as a waste of time might feel like a win in the short term, but if the Yes movement isn’t moving forward with purpose, people will start looking for alternatives—whether that’s another party or simply switching off altogether. The SNP can’t take the independence vote for granted forever.

      Delete
    2. Alba was the creation of A S, and it became apparent as time went on that, rightly or wrongly, he saw it as a vehicle for revenge. It has achieved nothing positive. And the recent disclosures by James show it to be a truly appalling undemocratic party. I hope it goes, and the sooner the better.

      Delete
    3. The SNP are about to announce their 100 year plan (of servitude) - and they are right; we need to strap in, obey the boss and get our minds right to really go for it in 2130, or so.

      You just have to believe.

      Delete
    4. When a gang of lying conspirators try to fit you up for rape, the issue is justice.

      Delete
    5. I will wait for the court case to play out. That is justice.

      Delete
    6. Alba was always just a 'Revenge Vehicle' against Sturgeon/SNP and the chance for some political second rate has-beens to try and ride on the coat tails of a once-great politician who had also passed his sell-by date.
      Nothing else.
      With Salmond's demise, the entire sorry edifice will probably now fall - and the vast majority of Scots will hardly notice.

      Delete
    7. Flaw in the argument: The fact that James joined and fought to remain a member.

      If the Party was always that since the beginning how was James so duped and why did he want to stay in a 'Revenge Party'

      Delete
    8. David Francis slagging off our host James. Francis was given a warning by James you know. Francis is correct though that if the party shuts its doors the vast majority of Scots will hardly notice UNLESS ( if Francis can uses caps all the time surely I can have one) the Unionist media make a big thing out of it to damage Scottish independence. People like Francis will not care, for him it’s all about keeping the SNP monopoly control over independence not actual independence.

      He is wrong that Alba was set up as a party of revenge.

      Delete
    9. Anon@8:14,
      Stop talking UTTER PISH you CLOWN.

      Delete
    10. David Francis - that’s not fair you used three words in caps anon at 8.14pm only used one.

      Delete
  27. Anon at 5.15. We are talking about Alba. Why would you want to deflect? Anger at having been duped?

    ReplyDelete
  28. There are deaf, dumb and blind people posting on SGP. They come out with the same incorrect statement that I only post criticism and post no ideas to advance independence. I must have posted over a hundred times since 2020 that the SNP should have had a de facto referendum at the 2021 Holyrood election. A majority yes vote could have been won. What has happened since 2021 -a lot of broken SNP promises. After 2021 I also posted that the SNP could easily end the Parliament at any time and have a de facto referendum. I also post that the 2026 election should be a de facto referendum.

    What is the response from the SNP trolls. I don't have any plan or any ideas for independence. These are the deaf, dumb and blind SNP trolls and they include David Francis who admits he has no clue/plan as to how independence under the SNP will happen.

    On the other hand there are the other lot of SNP trolls who moan about me actually posting about a de facto referendum all the time.

    These diddies actually claim to want independence but what they really mean is only when the SNP get around to it. After all independence must only be secured by the SNP and it disnae matter if an asteroid obliterates earth first. The party is their life, it is everything, and it must be obeyed and never ever ever criticised.

    You were a bunch of diddies back in 2020 and as I told them at the time some of them have passed away to the great SNP house in the sky as part of the union with Sturgeon doing nothing about independence. The SNP diddies have been refreshed by people like David Francis and more of you will be in the great SNP house in the sky over the next ten years with the union still standing. But being the SNP diddies you are you are probably content that there will be a great big SNP house in the sky waiting for you.

    2025 is just like 2020 but worse since independence supporters are disillusioned with the SNP and are not voting. That's reality and you lot are to blame.



    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. But IFS, despite not being in or supporting Alba didn't you know that you're supposedly one of those poor, wee Albaists?

      Delete
    2. KC - “ I’m a little confused” I believe your GP can help with that condition.

      Delete
  29. IFS I will add to this: I work with elderly people, many of them were desperate for independence and had their hopes raised every time Sturgeon opened her gaping mouth to 'fire the starting gun' only for the inevitable U turn. This might not have upset many SNP members but for those nearing the end of their life it could be depressing if not deviating. Many of them have gone now, and all Sturgeon's COVID grandstanding is but a stain in history unravelled in the COVID inquiry. The present leadership were part of her shit team. Remember, 'i only surrounde myself with people I like' tho hell with competence. The SNP had every chance to capitalise on the worst UK governments in a long time and they didn't. With that record why should anyone believe they will get us free now? Johnston, Truss, Sunak it was an open goal. You have no idea what it's like to see elderly people being so badly let down by false self seeking promises. The SNP are a disgrace. Never thought I'd say that, but it happens to be true.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Well said WT. These people who go on about we have plenty of time, no need to rush, got to get it right etc etc never explain why they are just saying that now compared to previous times when it was all indyref2 and independence is just around the corner if you vote SNP. Are there any decent politicians.

      Delete
  30. I see the poor, wee Albaists really cannot take it, when a big spotlight, similar to the one which the Unionist Press/MSM normally ensures is kept firmly fixed on the SNP, has now been shone on their own back yard.
    Their sheer desperation to turn James's latest couple of threads PURELY on Alba, YET AGAIN into SNP Baad diatribes - as the sun sinks on their seething mess of a 'Party' - is as pathetic as it is predictable..
    I fully expect those wee diatribes to get even longer and even more deranged, as the further disintegration and irrelevance of Alba continues.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Noticed you haven't replied to IFS above and stopped replying in a previous blog post when similar points were made in disrespect response to you.

      It's always the same deflection.

      Delete
    2. I only reply when I think the post in question merits a reply.
      IFS does not often fall into that category.
      Not surprising, really.

      Delete
    3. “ I only reply when I think the post in question merits a reply.”
      Well that’s a blatant lie to use your oft used words.

      Delete
    4. Wrong.
      And, in any case, how would YOU know what posts I consider worth a reply?

      Delete
    5. David, I don't know if you're replying to me or to whom. All I can say is that you are no ally to the SNP or the yes movement. Why does everything have to be delivered with a snarl? I want independence, I have done so all my life, I've been a member of the SNP and been active to push for independence just as almost every member of Alba. I do t know why you hate people so much especially ones with the same aim. Even unionists require cajoling or convincing arguments to change to yes, insulting people really doesn't work.

      Delete
    6. WT.
      Thanks for your opinion.
      I fundamentally disagree with it - but that's life.

      Delete