Monday, February 5, 2024

You reap what you sow - Starmer overreaches himself with his obsessive "antisemitism" smears against left-wingers, and ends up losing huge numbers of votes among the Muslim community

You'll probably have encountered the "It Was A Scam" hashtag on social media, referring to the deeply cynical but remarkably successful attempts of an establishment cabal to get false or wildly exaggerated allegations of antisemitism against left-wingers to stick in the public consciousness, with a view to bringing down a Corbyn leadership which couldn't be dislodged in any other way.  Keir Starmer's involvement in that process would make it richly ironic if it turned out that he overreached himself by thinking uncritical support for Israel is the passport to electoral success, and ultimately lost huge numbers of votes among Britain's Muslim community (much bigger than the Jewish community, remember) due to his stance on Gaza.

A new Survation poll of British Muslims commissioned by the Labour Muslim Network is being billed as the first hard proof that Starmer is indeed paying the penalty.  However, a touch of caution is called for here, because the poll is being reported in a misleading way.  It's being suggested that Labour's support has "halved" among Muslims since the general election, but that seems to compare the 86% support Labour actually received in the 2019 general election with a 43% figure in the poll before the exclusion of undecideds.  That's an apples-and-oranges comparison because there were no "undecided votes" in the general election.  

Once undecideds are removed, the Survation poll still shows a dramatic drop in Labour's vote among Muslims since 2019, but it's not quite the total collapse that is being suggested...

Labour 60%
Greens 14%
Liberal Democrats 9%
Conservatives 8%
SNP 4%

So that's actually around a twenty-six point drop for Labour since 2019.  There's not much doubt that Starmer's stance on Gaza is largely the culprit, because 85% of respondents say that the conflict in Gaza is important in determining how they will vote, and only 5% disagree.  Starmer also has a negative personal rating in the poll, with 40% regarding him unfavourably and only 29% favourably.

That said, Muslims only make up around 5% of the UK population, so a 26-point drop among Muslim voters equates to around a 1-point drop among voters as a whole.  So if you want to know why Muslim anger about Gaza hasn't really impacted the national polls, that's the reason.  The dangers for Labour are that the anger about Gaza will extend to large swathes of non-Muslim voters, perhaps particularly in the student population as we saw after the Iraq War, and also that disproportionate geographical concentrations of Muslims could lead to Labour losing specific seats under first-past-the-post.

In case you're wondering, there's no published Scottish subsample in the poll - Survation have crudely split the sample into "London", "North West [of England]", "Yorkshire and the Humber", "West Midlands", and "Other", with Scotland being lumped into the latter.  Which is really odd, because the SNP at 4% of the GB-wide vote implies significant numbers of respondents were from Scotland.

*  *  *

Before we finish, a reminder that the Scot Goes Pop opinion poll fundraiser urgently needs a boost - let's not leave it in limbo for months.  It's important that not all Scottish opinion polling is commissioned by anti-independence clients - we need to make sure that occasionally questions are asked that Yes supporters want asked.  Donations can be made via the fundraiser page HERE.

However if you have a Paypal account the best way to donate is via direct Paypal payment, because that can totally eliminate fees depending on which option you select, and payment usually comes through instantly.  My Paypal email address is:

jkellysta@yahoo.co.uk

75 comments:

  1. I’ve heard the conventional wisdom is that Muslim voters don’t matter because they are heavily concentrated in England’s urban, Labour held, safe seats. FPTP buries anyone’s importance when they don’t live in competitive seats.

    It’s a bit more complex here in Scotland—hi, Survation!—because the SNP are also strong in urban, diversely populated seats. Also: the SNP has a Muslim leader with a fundamentally more humane stance on Israel/Gaza. So this weakness of Starmer’s could well be disproportionately strong here in Scotland. Mixed in with the SNP’s overall weakness, of course.

    ReplyDelete
  2. The Rochdale by-election is an early test of this weakness in Muslim support. At only 19% of the population of Rochdale, however, Muslim votes won’t likely decide the outcome even here.

    ReplyDelete
  3. The SNP deserve a lot of credit for their leadership on this issue.

    ReplyDelete
  4. The National reports that Yousaf said some of his closest friends still need convincing on independence. Aye that would be Sturgeon, Swinney, Blackford, Robison, Somerville, Flynn, Robertson and Foote.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Anon at 5.14pm - a whiff of Britnat shit.

      Delete
    2. Thankfully the majority of the country doesn't need any convincing.

      Delete
    3. True though, whether you like it or not, you’re in a minority.

      Delete
    4. Eh? It's true that I'm in the majority, but I'm in the minority? Get back to us when you've got the story straight lol

      Delete
  5. WGD numpty barpe says:- " Sorry, but I won't listen to anything a Green MSP says ever again , since they have just effectively given Fluffy Mundell a GE election win by splitting the SNP INDY vote."

    INDY vote - what Indy vote ya numpty. There is only a vote for a party. These numpties always see it as the other party that is in the wrong. If you want a vote for Indy then chastise the SNP - the SNP rejected a Scotland United de facto referendum. It's ALWAYS the SNP at fault but these numpties are so blind that they always see it as someone else at fault. The SNP promised a referendum for years but didnae deliver.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Yeah it's got to be a de facto referendum. 100% guaranteed success.

      Delete
    2. Well said, totally agree.

      Delete
    3. The chances of success for the unionist side in a de facto referendum are zero.

      Delete
  6. Humza has shown significant leadership on the question of Gaza, a point that in and of itself has probably not gone unnoticed either in wider international circles or in the electorate in Scotland. Obviously, he does not do it for votes, rather he does it because it is the right thing for him to do.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. The idea that the wider international community are listening to what comes out of Holyrood is risible. Also Humza may not be doing it for votes but he certainly makes sure we all hear about it.

      Delete
    2. It’s not as heroic as you’re making out. Any polling to seriously suggest the majority of Scots side with Israel? Aye right.

      Delete
  7. I saw the SNP's Drew Hendry was talking to the Martin Geezer on the Sunday show about energy and oil/gas licenses. Didn't actually watch it but I bet he talked about global warming and the need to stop issuing new licenses even though the SNP have no control over the matter as it is wholly reserved to Westminster. I'll also bet Hendry didn't mention the fact that the BBC and Better Together lied about the oil/gas running out.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Drew put in a strong performance for the SNP on the Sunday Show. Contrary to what you say he put forward answers which strongly defended Scotlands interests and which will not be quickly forgotten.

      Delete
    2. All right, I'm convinced now, you're a parody of a bad astroturfer rather than the real thing. There's a touch of genius to lines like "and which will not be quickly forgotten".

      Delete
    3. Parody would be madder, though. “This interview will be remembered in the same breath as Bannockburn and that episode of Rab C Nesbitt with the Govan by-election. Children will learn them all in school…” Either they’re a very gentle satirist or an unaware and pompous buffoon.

      Delete
    4. Anon at 7.13pm - are you for real - that sounds like someone reading from a script. Anyway you never said he took the opportunity to point out Better Together's big lie in 2014 that oil was running out and would be finished in 10 years time. In fact the SNP never point this out. It is an open goal but the SNP don't even bother shooting. Why - because they don't think independence. They think politics.
      The thing about SNP propagandists like anon at 7.13pm is they think the thin gruel of "Drew put in a strong performance blah blah " means anything to me - it doesn't. I want independence not strong performances on Britnat tv shows.

      Delete
  8. Muslims in Scotland are more than 5 %, also It's not like England where they only have the Greens as alternative to Labour, there is the SNP

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. I'd have to check, but I very much doubt Muslims make up more than 5% of the population in Scotland. In fact I'm almost certain you're wrong.

      Delete
  9. Muslim, Christian, whatever. Far to much credibility is given to “faith” demographics who believe in imaginary beings who live up in the sky. If they genuinely believe in that stuff it’s going to affect their political decisions and that’s bad for everyone.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. The SNP has a strong record where it comes to supporting people of faith. Whether it is Humza or Kate, the SNP values people of faith at all levels in the party.

      Delete
    2. Let's hope they value Kate enough to make her leader before the general election.

      Delete
    3. Then let's hope that anon at 7:13 isn't representative of the SNP as he obviously holds religious views in contempt, an attitude I saw
      all over social media from party members during Forbes leadership campaign.

      Delete
    4. Anonymous at 7:49, I agree but think it’s very unlikely there’ll be a change of leader before the GE.
      Plus if the GE turns out not as bad as predicted, they may even try to carry on with Yousaf.

      Delete
    5. SteveP: in all of this it's important to be realistic about the SNP's prospects, given that the last election threw up outcomes which are the consequence of special circumstances, and given that the FPTP electoral system can lead to changes in seat numbers that are disproportionate to the changes in underlying vote share.

      Delete
    6. That's exactly why I keep pointing out they could literally end up with two seats - they'd be back to 1979 or 1983. If you think Humza could survive that sort of outcome because of "realism", you're dreaming.

      Delete
    7. Who would want to take over in that dumpster fire, though? Who wants to be the SNP’s William Hague or, if you’ll pardon my language, Kezia Dugdale? Coming back from that would be a multi-election, multi-leader project.

      Delete
    8. Could Yousaf even be the SNP's Jim Murphy - like Murphy Yousaf talks a good game but ends up getting thrashed at the election and is never seen again (except for a few people in Clarkston spotting him out running).

      Delete
    9. I don’t see the GE being anything other than bad for the SNP.
      The question is, how bad will it need to be for them to get rid of Yousaf?

      Delete
    10. Rory the Tory and Alastair Campbell like him, apparently. Via the National:

      “I was really charmed, he’s an excellent communicator. I really think that very few politicians are quite so warm and open,” Stewart said to Campbell at the end of the episode. “About his mental health, about his family. He’s very good at avoiding defensive jargon.”

      Both co-hosts said that the First Minister was “more defensive” when talking about the EU and Scotland’s productivity and Campbell added he wasn’t “clear” what the SNP’s strategy is.

      But Stewart added: “I think he’s got a great future ahead of him. He’s very young and if he’s resilient, he could emerge as a really major statesman in the next 20 years in Britain.”


      That’s the underlying problem with Humza and the nuSNP: they will still be playing politics inside the UK, guaranteed.

      Delete
    11. It is surely only a good thing that he is likeable and impresses others?

      Delete
    12. He really is the nation's sweetheart.

      Delete
    13. But which one? That’s the problem. They’re not meant to be the Northern British National Party.

      Delete
    14. A realistic approach must be adopted in all reason. It does have its limits of course. Many supporters of Humza would concede that if the SNP were to fall to single figures then it would be reasonable for a leadership challenge to be considered and Humza may in fact resign in the wider interests of the SNP in order for a fresh relaunch of the party to begin.

      Delete
    15. Well that's big of him. But even if the SNP fall to 10 or 15 or maybe even 20, I think he would be toast.

      Delete
    16. Humza is a seat warmer for Angus Robertson. They’re a one-two act. The first one loses Westminster. The second one loses Holyrood. Job done.

      Continuity Team!

      Delete
    17. When did Britnats thinking an independence leader is a jolly good chap is a good thing for an independence leader. They should be scared of the independence leader. Yousaf a "major statesman in Britain" - Stewart is taking the piss.

      Delete
    18. Nope it's not Angus

      Delete
    19. The 'imaginary beings who live up in the sky', besides representing irrational hope and the dream of magic, embody people's materially-based cultural and -- most importantly -- ethical beliefs. In this way religion is quite relevant to politics. Militant atheists seem to overlook the context and see religion as consisting purely of its myths.

      Delete
    20. Militant atheists all fondle the same straw man, so to speak!

      Delete
  10. Soon to be deleted anon: say *why* then. You too afraid you’ll lose?

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. To whom is your post addressed?

      Delete
    2. The usual plonker, who was indeed deleted. He claims again and again that Scotland will never be independent and our means for winning that goal aren’t credible. Never a word of his rationale, though. Because there is none.

      Delete
    3. Anonymous at 10:20, what are you on about?

      Delete
  11. Charlieboy wants to give hope to people who have cancer. It's his public duty to be open and transparent we are told. As he is getting his treatment immediately it would be fair to say he has a lot more hope than a lot of people on long cancer treatment waiting lists throughout his kingdom. The Britnat grovelling media, of course, decide not to mention this inconvenient fact but fear not we are also told Charlieboy is there for all other cancer sufferers. Clearly they are not singing God Save The King often and loudly enough at Ibrox these days although I guess Rule Britannia and The Sash are probably still favourites. The King is now so transparent that we are told he may deem to tell us exactly what cancer he is suffering from in say a years time or so. Meanwhile his government continues to support the daily massacre of children in Gaza and the murder/imprisonment of other children in the West Bank. UK sponsored starvation of Palestinians is now on the horizon. God save the children.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Anon at 9.52am - nice to hear from a very optimistic chappy. God save the children.

      Delete
  12. Salmond, Labour, Tory, same thing, nothing to offer Scotland except rubbishing the SNP who keep right on beating all of you, and you still don't get why because you're too busy whining
    The public don't vote for whiners

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. You certainly have a point.
      The SNP needs to get it’s act together though, it’s not too hard to see why a lot are pissed off with them.
      There’s no doubt we need a strong SNP, let’s just hope the GE marks the low point.

      Delete
    2. Anon at 4.53am - 😂😂😂😂 the biggest moaners and whiners are the SNP MPs in Westminster - all they do is stand up moan and whine away about bad Westminster then pissof to stuff their faces with food and drink in the numerous bars and restaurants spending the money they get from Westminster. They never do anything to progress independence. I have zero respect for them or Sturgeon's gang - nor you anon, because your post is all about winning seats for the SNP and nothing about independence. So your post is mince anon, the public clearly vote for whiners - they are the SNP MPs.

      Delete
    3. "There’s no doubt we need a strong SNP, let’s just hope the GE marks the low point."

      *IF* they change for the better. But only if. The ball is in their court, not ours and certainly not Scotland's.

      Delete
    4. There's so much that can be done about independence now that the polling evidence shows a majority wants it. What are we waiting for?

      Delete
    5. Anon at 2.29: Totally agree.

      Delete
    6. Should "we" be chapping doors and talking up Scotland, by any chance? Should we wheesht (our complaints about the SNP) for Indy?

      Because while you're right about the majority, you're wrong to imply that regular punters like us can do anything about it. The leader of the Yes movement—the leader of the Scottish National Party—has the exclusive clout and institutional means as First Minister to ACT on independence.

      Delete
    7. With respect, I think anon comment at 2.29 was extremely sensible.

      Delete
    8. Maybe you missed Rutherglen and other results. And maybe you think that people are impressed by politicians who bubble under questioning.

      Delete
    9. Go on then, enlighten us. What can we do that Humza can’t? Tell our neighbours for the thousandth time that we’d like them to vote Yes, if we ever happen to be lucky enough to live to see another referendum? They’ll love that one. They’ve heard it all before!

      Delete
    10. Time for a de facto.

      Delete
    11. Local factors in Rutherglen.

      Delete
    12. Whoever you are: you’re too thick to be AI. Bravo. 👏

      Delete
  13. Here's Kate Forbe's Church: https://www.thescottishsun.co.uk/news/4128820/free-church-scotland-continuing-islam-koran-satanic-lie-msp-anas-sarwar/

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Preach it, Brother Atheist!

      I don't believe in god either, mate. But you're changing no one's minds by laughing at religion. It is what it is. The good people who "believe" it can hardly follow it all to the letter.

      Delete
    2. Anon 10:38 Interesting how some atheists are so anxious to sneer at Christianity but will rush to the defence of Islam to prove their woke purity.

      Delete
  14. "The Union" (chortle) is embarrassing nonsense. Time for a de facto referendum. A plebiscite election, if you will.

    ReplyDelete
  15. Unsurprisingly James, Irish Skier didn't think much of your article regarding SNP voters moving to Labour. Mind you a number of other WGD numpties just couldn't see any reason why an SNP voter should vote Labour now and you are now part of the Alba revenge project whose only objective is SNP bad. Sad Skier couldnae resist throwing in a wee jibe about getting his £20 quid back from you. These WGD numpties just cannae see who caused all this division - Sturgeon's gang. Instead they still hero worship the person ( Sturgeon) who left the SNP in a dreadful state and the yes movement divided.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. For the record, I didn't refund him. As I explained to him at the time, I had long since spent the money in exactly the way I said I would, and I can hardly be expected to keep funds in reserve for an indefinite period just in case everyone suddenly demands a refund months or years later. He then requested a refund direct from the fundraising site, and the outcome of his correspondence with them had nothing to do with me and didn't affect me in any way.

      Delete
    2. I love the bit where Skier says "As a geochemist / chemical engineer". Is that his nineteenth career to date? LOL

      Delete
    3. He's a lavvie inspector first, last and always. He seems to be keeping a secret from the Duggers but he must be 'bursting' to tell them.

      Delete