There's a well-worn political cliché, which may or may not have been started by Ronald Reagan after his defection from the Democrats to the Republicans, that "I did not leave my party, my party left me". Rarely, though, have those words been quite so literally true as they are in my own case. I did not leave the Alba Party, the Alba Party left me. I was committed to Alba, I was working away as an elected member of three of its national committees until September...and then they suddenly told me to f*** off because I wasn't quite slavishly obedient enough to pretend that two plus two equals five. So nobody in Alba can have any complaints at all about what I am about to say - I have rejoined the Scottish National Party, which I was previously a member of between 2014 and 2021. And as long as the SNP allow me to remain a member, yes, that does of course mean I will be voting "both votes SNP" in May 2026.
Now, I am in no way naive about the decision I have just made. There have been crackdowns on freedom of speech within the SNP, both before and after my own time as a member, and those have sometimes been almost as bad as the crackdowns within Alba. (I say 'almost' as bad because what has happened in Alba has undoubtedly been worse.) So it's perfectly possible that I could end up speaking my mind about what I see as the best way forward for the SNP and for Scotland, and find "disciplinary" action being taken against me again, and if that happens I'll just have to find a Plan B - or I suppose it would be Plan C by that stage. But I very much hope I can now just get on with pressing for independence on an ongoing basis as a loyal member of the SNP. I would just note that in my seven previous years as an SNP member, I made many outspoken comments on this blog, but in complete contrast to Alba, the SNP actually allowed me to do that and I didn't start receiving sinister emails from the heavy mob. So I'll just have to hope I'm equally fortunate the second time around.
I would imagine that when I joined Alba in 2021, I posted the join link on this blog in case anyone wanted to follow my example, and I've sincerely apologised for that, because I had no idea of the authoritarian freak show I was getting caught up in. So although I will now post the link to join the SNP (and here it is) in case anyone else is thinking it's time to work for change inside the SNP rather than outside it, please make sure you're doing it for your own reasons and have thought carefully about the pros and cons. On your own head be it!
One advantage of joining, of course, is that you'd get a vote when a leadership election eventually comes up. It's no secret that if I'd been an SNP member in March 2023, I would have given a higher preference vote to Kate Forbes than to Humza Yousaf, but contrary to some people's lazy assumptions that's not because I'm "centre-right" - in fact in many respects I'm probably politically closer to Yousaf than to Forbes. But Yousaf was just the wrong man, at the wrong time, and he was being installed by the ruling faction for all the wrong reasons. I feel a lot more at ease with the SNP under the Swinney/Forbes leadership, and if it was just a question of who would make the best government, this current team would be a no-brainer. It's not like that, though, the purpose of the SNP is supposed to be to actually deliver independence, and although I'll just be a drop in the ocean as one member out of tens of thousands, I will be arguing the case for the SNP to start accepting that 50% + 1 support for Yes is enough and to push for the endgame on independence on that basis, rather than waiting endlessly for some mythical "overwhelming" support that is highly unlikely to ever arrive.
By the way, a small number of people have contacted me in recent days to say they're leaving Alba, not necessarily just because of what happened to me, but that was a contributory factor. If you do leave Alba, for whatever reason, please ensure that you actually cancel your direct debit, because I've sat and listened to Chris McEleny boasting that "once you've got someone on direct debit, you've got them for life, nobody ever bothers cancelling". The plan seems to be to get as many members onto direct debit as possible, and only then announce that the subscription fee is being hiked. So please don't allow yourself to be fleeced by the world's most cynical man.
For my part, I'm just relieved to have a political home once again, and we'll see how it goes.
EXCELLENT!
ReplyDeleteBTW - I have a very good quality Flack-Jacket you can borrow for the near future on here!
Stay safe, mate 😁
'Flak-Jacket'
DeleteBTW - Better get the escape shutes and life jackets ready for those about to bail........
ReplyDeleteOut of curiosity though: Why did you leave the SNP previously? In your heart of hearts has anything fundamentally changed in the SNP since the last time you were a member? Has anything fundamentally changed that indicates an effort to change the Party from within when previous attempts to do so (The 'Good Guys' campaign etc) were unsuccessful?
ReplyDeleteI understand the need to find a political home but it could be argued that it's a step backwards when the reasons why so many left in the first place and Parties like Alba etc initially formed have never been addressed.
There's never been any serious self-reflection, push for reform or attempts made to heal in the divisions in the wider Yes movement. SNP members even voted for a Constitutional Convention to take place in 2023, why hasn't that happened for example? The SNP have considerable work to do to win back the support and members they've lost, but there hasn't thus far been much of a willingness to do so. Everyone who left are just portrayed as being troublemakers or helping the union by questioning/criticising the SNP (but that surely can't be the case when they're talking numbers in the tens of thousands).
"Why did you leave the SNP previously?"
DeleteThere are two answers to that. Firstly, 2021 was the peak of the identity poltics zealotry, and I found the sacking of Joanna Cherry from the front bench to be deeply concerning. The SNP may since have improved somewhat on that front. But mostly I was making a positive choice to join Alba, but unfortunately most of those positive reasons have proved to be illusory. There isn't more freedom of speech in Alba, there's less. Alba isn't more democratic than the SNP, it's more autocratic. Alba isn't working constructively towards independence, it's on a destructive revenge mission. There's no intention to cooperate with other parties - the explicit reason (and only reason) for Geoff Bush's expulsion was the interview he gave to The National urging cooperation with other pro-indy parties and candidates. And Alba isn't the social democratic party Alex Salmond promised - it's drifting alarmingly to the right on some issues.
Can't speak for James but I left the SNP because I couldn't stomach the 100k motorhome, the disregard for the NEC. lack of transparency and a suspiciously hostile attitude to other independence campaigners. Also, the lack of foresight to create a proper non party independence vehicle to maximise the yes vote.
DeleteI wish anyone luck joining. I'm happy without a party at the moment. To me, the snp are the best of a bad bunch but are a (tired) party of government, not independence.
aye sure Christopher!
DeleteWelcome home James.
ReplyDeleteI'm not sure that you're really relating and responding to things in the way you should.
ReplyDeleteSince I've been doing the Newcastle Course I've spent more time connecting to things at a deeper level.
And now I think that I could really batter Kelly Given in a debate.
A merry afternoon to all of my beloved friends, but especially to you, Shannon Donoghue. I am your most devoted fan.
DeleteZulfs,
DeleteYou are always a shoulder to lean on.
It's very nice when you say these things - but I'd like if people became my political worshippers - not only fans.
I shall never vote for Sturgeon
ReplyDeleteYou're in luck - she's not leader anymore.
DeleteNot even when she comes out as a 'stunning and brave' lesbian now that wee fat Peter has been thrown under the motorhome?
DeleteShe learned so much from reading crime novels.
DeleteA KC post that actually made me laugh! Well done, man.
DeleteNicola’s living the True Crime Podcast lifestyle now. Revelations daily.
If the former FM isn't in your constituency you cant vote for her. She has had a lucky escape Jackie B!
DeleteWelcome back, and long may your inexhaustible energy help the Independence cause. Big Jon
ReplyDeleteGlad to have you back in the party James. I also hope you keep calling things as you see them. The SNP should be a broad church and a healthy competition of ideas should be welcomed.
ReplyDeleteI'm pleased for you, James. It's a decision you're obviously comfortable with.
ReplyDeleteSensible decision, James.
ReplyDeleteWow amazing. A one liner from Lomax that isnae snidey. See Lomax you do have it in you to be a decent person - pity it's only once every 5 years.
DeleteJames, can you still support tactical voting on the list to build a super majority for independence.
ReplyDeleteNo, and that's not just because of my membership of the SNP. I've always taken the view that the Holyrood voting system is for the most part not really "hackable" and that people should therefore vote for their first choice party on the list, which is the more important of the two ballots.
DeleteAbsolutely agree James and I’m glad to see you say that the list is the more important vote. So many people don’t get this, maybe in part because it’s often erroneously called the second vote, or lazy shorthands like SNP 1 & 2 are used. Unless one party dominates the constituencies (à la SNP in 2011) the list vote will deliver a roughly proportional result. It’s therefore critical to use your list vote for the party you most want to see in Holyrood, rather than some second preference.
DeleteThe SNP got 16 list seats in 2011, even though they got 53 constituency seats.
DeleteThe Alba Party have been a major disappointment in many ways.
ReplyDeleteBut the SNP have fundamentally not changed: It's still run by the same leadership cabal as before. One that is unaccountable to the membership. Dishonest John the Redactor the Cringer is there's as Sturgeon's glove puppet and, when his caretaker period is over, you'll have either Fathead Flynn or Freeport Forbes as the next Empty Coat. Both careerists.
Yes, we can see that you always supported the SNP ifs- You are a party of 1.
DeleteUnfortunately you are a payroll of many.
DeleteThat's how you win.
DeleteIFS has disappeared into anonymity !
DeleteBut you're still a thick plank of wud Lomax.
DeleteLomax The Railway Man is a sleeper.
DeleteLomax you have always been anonymous.
DeleteYou were baptized Independence for Scotland?
DeleteAnon at 6.36pm - wrong wrong and wrong. Quite an achievement for such a short snidey post. Wrong 1. - not me posting. Wrong 2 - I have never said I have ALWAYS supported the SNP - I always supported the SNP up to and including the 2021 Holyrood election. Wrong 3 - I am not a member of any political party and have no wish to be a member.
DeleteAnon at 6.01pm - there was me thinking I was the only one thinking up nicknames. Very good - 9 out of ten. I have no problem with your post but I would ask you make it clear you are not me. I agree there are a lot of Toom Tabards in the SNP leadership.
John the redactor? Who can this be? It’s funny that he thinks we don’t know.
DeleteAnon at 11.09 - clearly asking that question means you were born an idiot. It's not your fault just your luck.
DeleteA big day for James. An even bigger day for staunch dugger Dr Jim. Finally, the path is clear for him to have a shot at the title.
ReplyDeleteSo, James has finally chosen the 'lesser of political party evils' and rejoined the SNP.
ReplyDeleteA VERY good thing for all Yessers.
SGP has always had an excellent reputation for both poll-analysis and critical thinking based on that analysis.
That will not change, just because James has switched Party allegiance.
Far more important to the Indy Cause, though, is the fact that he will now be directly involved within the biggest and most powerful poltical entity capable of actually getting us to where we want to go - rather than just stuck out on the periphery.
I would suggest that there are no real losers here, only winners, in the bigger picture.
Needless to say, the usual coterie of SNP/Sturgeon/Yousaf/Swinney Haters will not be best pleased but that, to me, is perfectly acceptable collateral damage.
Onwards and upwards, folks!
Gawd.. I agree with everything here but you come off as such a knowitall
DeleteAnon@7:02,
DeleteYou’re not kidding!
D Francis is someone with a very high opinion of himself.
Don't over-estimate David Francis - he's more like an assert-it-all.
DeleteAnan @ 7.02pm: I think the adjective you may be searching for is "git".
DeleteAnon at 7:02
DeleteI know.
You're a loser Francis, a complete fucking loser.
DeleteAlba are the serial losers. How many elections have they won ?
DeleteAnon at 8.55. Satire or just stupidity.? How are things in Albaland.? Or Direct Debit land, I should say.
DeleteWe can all unite behind SNP 1&2 because surely Westminster will grant us a referendum this time! Why wouldn't they?
ReplyDeleteMaybe win an election convincingly with a majority first.
DeleteLike in 2015, 2016, 2017, 2019 and 2021, you mean?
Delete" Why wouldn't they?" The numptiness is strong in you. 😂😂😂😂
DeleteNope, I'm sure that Keir Starmer is chomping at the bit to be forever remembered as the most stupidest Prime Minister in history by willingly allowing the breakup of the UK to happen when he's under literally no pressure or obligation to ever allow a referendum.
DeleteWe could have 129 pro-indy MSP's and there still would be no reason for Starmer or any other PM to say "Here you go, have your referendum" it's nonsensical. Cameron only did it because he thought there was no possibly of it coming as close as it did and that he could put the issue to bed. No PM would ever risk it again.
I hope David Francis can explain why a future PM would be compelled to allow another referendum as he continually argues that's the only viable option?
DeleteDon't ask "what's your alternative plan" explain how and why The SNP's plan will ever actually work?
Anon at 10.21pm - David cannae answer your question. I have asked him that myself. Our site host James cannae answer that question either.
DeleteRead the words of anon at 7.26pm again. He says:- " grant us a referendum" that's your Scottish cringe right there.
Thank goodness getting Westminster consent isn’t the proposal. Surprised you all don’t know that.
DeleteFantastic choice James, welcome home. I'd imagine IFS won't be posting here anymore after that.
ReplyDeleteSkier you never have had much imagination except when punting your embarrassing Ski slope graph. Perhaps you should send a copy to Swinney - how about the one that forecast we would be independent by now.
DeleteIndependence now at 12% according to Skier's graph.
DeletePoor IFS. So much egg to wipe off.
DeleteAnon troll at 3.10am. Why?
DeleteWell done James, I think you'll be happier going forward now⏩
ReplyDeleteBtw, I too have returned to BOTH VOTES SNP ✓✓
Glad to hear this James - I share many of the same reservations you do over the SNP despite having been a member of the Party for 41 years - but at the moment I think it is better to work from within to achieve change on the approach they take to Independence and how to achieve it than to do so from without. I very much like Kenny Macaskill, Neale Hanvey and Ash Regan - but I am afraid that the premature passing of Alex Salmond heralds the end for Alba. IMO it would be better if the other Alba members also rejoined the SNP and sought to argue for change from within.
ReplyDeleteThe flaw in that plan though is that attempts to reform the SNP from within were attempted before Alba etc were formed.
DeleteMany will argue that the SNP today shows no signs that it's any more reformable now than it was in 2020, and if anything the Party today is a shadow of the Party it was even then.
It wasn’t given s long enough chance
DeleteAlbs came along a few months after the ‘good guys’ were elected and most of them went to Albs
Now maybe if the good guys had stayed in the SNP the SNP would be very different today
Alba was a bit of luck for the union
It was indeed and the motivation of personal revenge, justified or not, meant it was always doomed to failure, especially after the untimely death of A S. McEleny’s comment about Direct Debits tells you all you need to know about his motives.
DeleteJames, an honest question. How much of your decision to rejoin the SNP so quickly was about sticking two fingers up at Alba?
ReplyDeleteNone. I've said all along I had no intention of being left politically homeless for a moment longer than necessary, and it wasn't my choice that Alba briefly left me politically homeless. Expulsion is the most extreme step any party can take against a member, and yet Alba have taken it. At some point they'll have to face up to the fact that the way they've been behaving is not normal, it's not routine, it's actually deeply weird and abnormal. Those of us affected by their Kafkaesque behaviour have just been finding a way forward as best we can. Because the disciplinary process was so obviously a sham with a predetermined outcome, I've had months and months to think about what I would do after being expelled, and I considered all of the options carefully.
DeleteVery good answer, James.
DeleteIt seems to me ALBA has stuck 2 fingers up to many of their members or now ex-members. Self-induced injuries
ReplyDelete
ReplyDeleteGuess the author and the subject:
"That pillock has returned to the natural home for morons that is Sturgeonite NuSNP. Only a gibbering eejit could present himself as working for independence while simultaneously vowing to vote SNP1&2 to help keep snouts in the gravy trough. "
Well I would say Campbell, obviously, but "pillock" and "eejit" are a bit polite for him, he would normally use the C-word. McEleny?
DeleteA Wings-Wankpiece, obviously.
DeleteBut which one....???
Only a few really to choose from.
DeleteWell done James. The right choice.
ReplyDeleteAlthough I'm not a member of any party, I'm glad to see you've rejoined the SNP because they are the only party at present likely to bring about independence. I know that statement will provoke the usual shriekers to squeal that the SNP is a Redmondite party of devolution, fighting against independence, but hysterics will be hysterical. They thrive on the drama. So, best of luck in the SNP and here's hoping you and others like you can refocus the party back on to the right track.
ReplyDeleteThough we've been told that for the last decade and we've got John Swinney planning to be First Minister until 2031. I'm nearly 40 now, I'd like to see some movement before I collect my pension & others on here are in the ground.
DeleteThey're doing it just to get at you. And you alone. You're special.
DeleteJames deserves credit for rejoining SNP. Well done.
ReplyDeleteExcellent coverage of the ferry scandal on the BBC this evening. It even made the 6 O’clock UK wide news.
ReplyDeleteOf course it did. The BBC created the 'scandal'.
DeleteBlind loyalty is poisonous. How is the ferries not a scandal? Lol
DeleteGiving arms to idf is a scandal, the high speed train is a scandal x10, profiteering over covid masks is a scandal, leaking aircraft carriers are a scandal, Met police are a scandal….
DeleteAnon at 10.34. Give us chapter and verse. In your own time.
DeleteJust looking on google around Europe for the average age of Ferry-Fleets.
ReplyDeleteIt may well be that Scotland, in the next few years, will have the youngest, best equipped and best performing Ferries not only in the UK, but in the entire EU.
We're not in the EU. The SNP allowed us to be dragged out of the EU against our will. Remember?
Delete“In the next few years”
DeleteWhat about the present?
The ferry scandal is an embarrassment to Scotland, for which this SNP SG are largely to blame.
Your defence of the SNP in this dabacle beggers belief.
Read what I said.
DeleteThe average age of ferries over the whole of Europe is approx 35 years.
The average age of the present Calmac ferry fleet (excluding Glen Sannox) is 24 years.
So, Scotland already has the advantage - and this will only increase as the newer, more luxurious and better equipped boats presently on order/ getting built, start to arrive.
And I stated previously on anothed thread, Calmac's overall performance stats rank among the best in the near-continent.
And the problems we have had with the two Scottish boats, while very substantial, are certainly not unique in comparison to some other Countries.
So, I stand by what I stated - in just a few years time, Scotland will probably have one of THE youngest, most luxurious and best performing ferry fleets in the whole of Europe.
There is no "scandal". A BBC invention. A scandal is HS2, Hinkley Point, London Crossrail, PPE corruption, etc.
DeleteDon't be a silly - don't fall for the BBC.
The cost has quadrupled to nearly half a billion for a couple of ferrirs and David Francis thinks it's great news.
DeleteJust looks stupid to any ordinary punter.
The spinning machine is malfunctioning, you've push it to its limits!
DeletePeople here get very silly when they mention Hinkley Point - no government in the UK is paying for it. All financed by EDF and the Chinese
DeleteInteresting, but not in the least surprising, The National's headline for tomorrow -
Delete"Files CONFIRM MI5 snooped on Scottish Nationalists"
"Papers show British Security Services feared French support"
( presumably for Independence).
As I have said many times........it is just what the British State has ALWAYS done, is STILL doing and will CONTINUE to do, in respect of our Yes Movement.
The biggest issue in the whole debacle was the SNP awarding the contract to build the two ferries to Fergusons in an attempt to make political gain.
DeleteThat WAS scandalous.
But The SNP itself is pure and has never been infiltrated?
DeleteAnyway James,
DeleteYou should get yourself along to your next local SNP Branch Meeting, start pressing the flesh and espousing your ideas.
Mine is coming up in early February and I will certainly be dropping your name and that of this blog into all my conversations.
Get mingling, pal.
Perhaps the European ferry age is skewed by the boats that run the Baku - Turkmenbashi route. I wouldn't imagine that the ferries that cross the Volga are much better.
DeleteDavid Francis - did the National say the MI5 snoop was Liz Lloyd in Sturgeon's office or was it Evans, the permanent secretary or was it her soon to be Ex husband. Such a choice - so many to choose from.
DeleteI thought James was your MATE and pal was a derogatory term but now you tell him to " Get mingling, pal.
What SNP branch is it you will be telling all about SGP? Why the big secret David?
The discussion above on the ferries and at other times is just silly. On the one hand you have the David type argument that the ferries are bestest in the world extreme and the other extreme of KC that it is the biggest ever scandal the world has ever known. Both silly extremes but typical of the characters involved.
I watched STV news and their coverage was like the three stooges but there were 4 reporters. Two female reporters on the Glen Sannox and a male reporter at Troon waiting for it to dock. Not to mention a reporter on Arran itself. This was the main news story of the programme. Overkill, you bet. Subtle propaganda it was not. I lost count at 4 when the reporters each kept restating the same things over and over again - namely "it was 7 years late and it cost the taxpayer hundreds millions of pounds." The best laugh was the Newsreader Kelly staggering about as the boat rocked as she tried to maintain her composer while she looked like a drunk in a Billy Connolly sketch. There was an obvious gratuitous troll of independence supporters when the camera lingered on the union flag flying over the boat. However, KC may want to reflect on the fact that if the boat is a major scandal it is obviously a UK scandal - why would the union flag be flying on the boat if it isnae.
Time to add this scandal to the list of UK scandals - it's a long list.
If Sturgeon thought her announcement on the same day as the launch of the Glen Sannox might get little coverage then STV news would have disappointed her.
@ 10.40
DeleteSomeone posted an interesting Holyrood clip the other day with the then opposition leaders Goldie, Grey, and Rennie all making the case for saving shipbuilding on the Clyde and ensuring that Ferguson's build the new ferries. It was no scandal. It was what everyone wanted. The bun fight between Calmac, CMAL and Ferguson on changing specs, the Brexit skill shortage and COVID all played their part, as the latter have in just about every other major project in the UK.
However, new ferries are going to be arriving every couple of months this year. Sour faced Yoons will move on to some new gripe de jour. My guess is it will be duelling the A9.
Looking at the world, Gaza, Ukraine, Sudan, LA and a somewhat deranged Whitehouse about to take office, the Scottish media obsession with a late ferry seems at best parochial
IFS@11:51,
DeleteWell, credit for sussing out it was me, BUT
“…….. if the boat is a major scandal it is obviously a UK scandal “
Dear oh dear oh dear🤣🤣
The ferry scandal has absolutely nothing to do with the UK government! Nothing at all.
As I said, the main contributing factor to this fiasco was the SNP’s ridiculous decision to award the contract to build the 2 ferries to Fergusons, in an attempt to make political gain. Every man and his dog can see that, although people like yourself of course won’t admit it..
Bringing the UK into it really is truly desperate.
KC I can spot you all over SGP. The fact remains the ferry sails under a UK flag - own it. The fact remains that Scotland is a colony of the UK so all the shit that happens in Scotland is UK shit.
DeleteIt's only Scottish shit when Westminster is told to f**k off like over 60 other independent nations have done in the past. Until then the UK owns all the crap happening in Scotland.
Handandshrimp - thought you said you were never ever posting on SGP again but hear you are once again. " seems at best parochial" it's Britnat propaganda shrimp.
DeleteNationhood and sovereignty are parochial, peripheral concerns to the occupier.
DeleteTbf, though, the A9 sorely needs upgraded as Scotland’s artery to the north. No excuses now the toxic greens are out the road.
IFS@10:09,
DeleteDo you realise just how ridiculous you’re coming across as by blaming the UK for the Scottish ferry scandal?
Have you suddenly become a fan of the SNP and a Sturgeon worshipper?
Make no mistake, the ferry scandal was created by this rotten SNP administration who tried to make political gain out of it. Only a fool can’t see that. Get a grip!
I said some time ago that I would have no problem if James rejoined the SNP. Why because he is a) for Scottish independence, b) he knows what is wrong with the SNP and c) he will not in my opinion be afraid to speak truth to power.
ReplyDeleteThere will be none of the fictitious claims by David Francis that he kicks ass in his secret SNP branch.
I wish James well in the SNP and hope he has lots of success in bringing the SNP back to its original, and what should be in my opinion, it's only mission, the return of full independence to the nation of Scotland.
Unlike Scottish ( Declan ) Skier I will not be asking for my donations back ( what a cheapskate you are Skier) nor will I be sending James angry emails full of childish tantrums like Skier.
James you clearly feel a need to be part of a political I sincerely hope this new direction works out better for you than it did with Alba.
My fundamental point I have been raising on SGP since 2020 still remains. If the SNP membership claim to be for Scottish independence then why are you letting your party be run by devolutionists who are never going to make any effort to get independence.
I asked David Francis on a number of occasions what will be different in the next 10 years when compared to the last 10 years to make independence happen. His acceptance of Swinney's overwhelming support statement shows that nothing will be different. More wasted years are ahead - perhaps David has secretly invented a method to live for 200 years because he will need it if he is planning to drink his malt on Independence Day. I can recommend Highland Park 18 year old.
Prefer Talisker.
DeleteWhenever you ask things like how will the SNP's plan actually work you always end up with deflection of "what's your alternative strategy!?" and when you explain alternative options he and others just disregard them out of hand with "that will never work!" all the while avoiding the original question: How and why will the SNP's plan as it stands work?
DeleteEven James wrote a recent blog entry asking "Where would the independence movement be after six more years of not particularly doing anything under John Swinney?" so it's obvious James doesn't agree that we can just get the SNP re-elected and Keir Starmer out of pure kindness and generosity to Scots allows another referendum to seal his fate as the last Prime Minister of the United Kingdom.
It's the David Francis's in the SNP who are the problem as they're the ones nodding & clapping away like sheep letting the stagnation happen.
Whatever happened to RISE ?
DeleteSheep can clap?
DeleteWell I never..........
Talisker? David - not very specific - there is a range of Talisker whiskies. If you have a bottle best just drink it when the SNP win an election because that will be the extent of their success for a long time to come. That might make SNP party people happy but it ain't independence.
DeleteIfs- states “I said some time ago that I would have no problem if James rejoined the SNP.“ That is nice of you. I hadn’t realised he needed your permission.
DeleteIFS=boring
ReplyDeleteAnon at 12.06am - you think your teeny post is what exactly - exhilarating - riveting even. IFS = Independence For Scotland. What a plonker you are anon.
DeleteIFS needs to hand back his benefits.
Delete1.23am - why does he have to hand back benefits and what benefits do you mean?
DeleteWhat business is it of yours?
DeleteTiresome shit from the troll at 1.23am. I don't receive any benefits to hand back but you know that already Mr troll as you have posted your shit before and I have told you that I don't receive benefits.
DeleteSo what do Scottish Skier and Dr Jim - WGD and SNP 'stalwarts' have to say about the Murrell's parting company. Time for a laugh.
ReplyDeleteArch SNP propagandist Skier spins it as something good for the SNP and Jimbo goes in the huff.
Skier says:- " Well we can be confident that Nicola Sturgeon's hubby won't be found guilty of embezzlement. In due course she won't have a husband." and;
" This is not good for the unionists, who would still have been hoping to push the deeply sexist ' guilty by association angle if, in the end, if eg only PM that was convicted of something. "
Now it wisnae that long ago Skier was spinning Murrell wisnae charged with anything after the polis actually charged him with embezzlement but here he is referring to Murrell being found guilty of embezzlement. In terms of Sturgeon's potential association with any embezzlement Skier conveniently ignores the fact that Sturgeon was party leader, married to Murrell and signed off the SNP accounts for about 9 years when any embezzlement was taking place.
Skier's spinning is so ridiculous it is funny.
Jimbo on the other hand just goes in the huff and grunts:- "Not much to say about this except the misogynist nut case hate brigade will fill the airwaves with even more of their anti Sturgeon bile."
Jimbo is clearly upset that he has missed his chance and found out Sturgeon is now living elsewhere. Unrequited love Jimbo - what a bitch😀
Many believe it was a marriage of convenience anyway. Now, Nicola can follow her heart.
DeleteIfs...you really are an odious little man arent you.
DeleteWelcome back, James.
ReplyDeleteThe SNP tore itself, and the Scottish independence movement, apart in the 1980s and 90s with the Gradualists v Fundamentalists feud which started off as a discussion about strategy but ended-up as a power struggle and phoney war between personalities and personal ambition.
Progress was only made after 1998 and the establishment of the Scottish Parliament meant that there were enough jobs for ALL the big egos.
If we are to win independence we need to capture the imaginations and the hard and sustained support of at least 60% of our fellow Scots, whom we often seem to forget are the key to our success, and then hold it together for as long as it takes.
That has always been our biggest challenge and we won't know what strategies we require to adopt until we see exactly the shape and height of the mountain we have to climb, something that will only become clear as the situation develops.
One thing is certain though, we will never make progress behind a divided movement and that means developing a culture of unity, conciliation and, as is often forgotten nowadays, patience behind the only political Party that can get us there.
Agree completely.
Delete"we will never make progress behind a divided movement and that means developing a culture of unity, conciliation"
DeleteQuestion is why hasn't that been pursued and why is there's no indication that's what's going to happen in the foreseeable future?
SNP members for example voted for a Constitutional Convention to take place in 2023, what's the hold up? As they say it takes two to tangle.
ReplyDeleteThe dream of Scottish independence remains strong for many of us, but we must face some uncomfortable truths if we are to achieve it. The fact is, no election or referendum has yet seen support for independence rise above 50%. Until we reach and maintain majority support, independence will remain out of reach. Here's why this matters, and why building a united and strategic movement is our most important task.
1. Independence Without Majority Support Is Impossible
How can we progress toward independence when half of Scotland is against it? Unity among independence supporters is crucial, but it’s just as important to win over those who are currently unsure or opposed. A referendum held without clear majority support would risk not only failure but further division, leaving Scotland weaker and independence further away.
2. The Practical Challenges of a Referendum Without a Section 30
For those advocating for a referendum without a Section 30 order, the reality is stark: it’s councils that compile voter rolls, staff polling stations, appoint returning officers, and organize counts. Unionist-led councils would almost certainly refuse to cooperate, effectively derailing any vote held outside Westminster’s agreement. Taking councils to court would only deepen divisions and undermine the legitimacy of the process.
3. Westminster’s Intransigence
Even with 55–60% support for independence, Westminster is unlikely to simply step aside. The Supreme Court’s decision has made it clear that under UK constitutional law, Parliament holds ultimate sovereignty. Westminster will not easily relinquish Scotland’s oil reserves, nuclear bases, or strategic assets. The struggle will be long and difficult, and international geopolitics, as shown by Putin and Trump, suggest that bigger nations are increasingly willing to exploit smaller ones for resources and power.
4. Unity and Majority Are Key
The first step toward independence is unity among independence supporters. But unity alone isn’t enough—we must also convince a consistent majority of Scots to back independence, whether in a referendum or an election. Without that clear mandate, we risk stagnation and losing momentum.
The Path Forward
Achieving independence will be a long, hard road, but it is not impossible. Here’s what we need to focus on:
Build Majority Support: Engage with undecided and No voters through respectful dialogue, focusing on practical benefits and addressing their concerns.
Strengthen the Movement: Avoid infighting and divisive tactics. A fractured independence movement only benefits those who oppose us.
Be Strategic: Push for independence in a way that maximizes legitimacy and minimizes division. This means prioritizing a lawful, recognized referendum when the time is right.
It may be galling to acknowledge that Westminster will not roll over, but facing this reality will only make us stronger. Independence isn’t just about breaking away from the UK; it’s about building a Scotland that’s ready to stand tall on its own. To do that, we need unity, strategy, and the support of the majority of Scots. Let’s focus on what really matters and keep moving forward—together.
If I had left a party I would not have rejoined unless substantial and real change had taken place first.
ReplyDeleteIn the case of the SNP that real change would have to be the removal of the entire current SNP hierarchy and the guarantee that committees would be bottom-up elected, not top-down appointed.
The latter was what happened in 2020 when the leadership didn't like the outcome of the NEC elections - they simply swamped the committees with their favourites. Sure the Alba Party re-ran elections which were rigged to ensure the preferred outcomes of their cabal so just as bad if no worse.
It would have been better, and more powerful, to continue to make your case outside of any parties until after they had conformed to democratic norms.
Many within the party will take James's rejoining the SNP as a full endorsement of their current independence strategy. Personally, I think it was a mistake to rejoin so quickly and looks for all the world like a decision made 'on the rebound'. That's just my take on it.
DeleteBeing a member of a political party involves a certain amount of being told what to do and what to think, and paying for the privilege. Dissenters need not apply is very much the mantra.
After the Alba experience, a period of self reflection and taking stock as a free man would've served James well. I fear he may be signing up for more immediate stress by joining the SNP, openly pushing for significant change, while being viewed by many as a turncoat. His rejoining would've carried more weight if he'd held his cards close to his chest for a while.
The SNP very much comes across as a 'fall in line and support Party policy' kind of Party. Any criticisms are seen as harming the Parties electoral chances and by extension supposedly harming independence.
DeleteJust look at the abuse Joanna Cherry for example received for not falling fully behind the Party Line and advocating for a change of strategy. I feel like James will be pissing against the wind and will become frustrated because he'll be expected to fall in line.
Or just ignored. It’s harder for them to do that to prominent folk the like of Cherry, but it’s the default for handling plebs like us.
DeletePissing into the wind is the perfect metaphor. I’ll upvote that image. Pretty sure it’ll come up soon enough.
I'm glad you have rejoined the SNP James. Joining a group of many thousands is in one way an inconsequential act, becoming one of many. But it is also a very important act because you have done it very visibly and for logical reasons stemming from your long standing support for independence.
ReplyDeleteHaving spelt out your reasons, and expressed your reservations about the SNP, you are in a good position to make sensible suggestions about party reform and I for one will be listening. You have publicly tested to destruction the idea that Alba is a suitable vehicle for independence, and for myself I have done the same with the Scottish Green Party.
The only remaining option is the SNP so we need to be realistic about the scale of the task!
Three out of four, Westminster voting intention polls conducted entirely within this year have RefUK leading the Tories (marginally). The latest is YouGov, field work 12 - 13 Jan.
ReplyDeleteScottish sub-sample is: Con 11%, Lab 23%, LibDem 8%, SNP 33%, RefUK 18%, Green 7%.
Very little can be reliably inferred from these micro-samples (198), but headline indications would be; the SNP still lag around 15% behind support for independence, and so much for RefUK being an England & Wales only phenomenon.
When the question is finessed to ask “who would you vote for if an election was held tomorrow in your constituency”, the numbers remain largely the same except the SNP drop to 28% and the Greens rise to 14.7%.
With the proviso that we are considering a micro-sample, the SNP vote would appear to be soft. It would be interesting to test this with a four figure population sample.
I'm not a member of the SNP, but I'm pleased to see that you have rejoined as I see it at the moment as the only realistic path to independence, albeit a very twisted and torturous one. I always thought you joining Alba was a mistake, but we live and learn. As a previous supporter of your blog/poll's I'll consider further support for your site.(albeit small 😉)
ReplyDeleteWell, perhaps one campaign could be to make MSPs sign an attendance register or get fined for too much absence. From the Herald:
ReplyDelete"Pay rise of more than £2,000 takes MSP salary to almost £75,000 "
For some that's probably £25,000 per day they attend - way more than for the House of Lords at £350.
If they're not going to attend Holyrood they should resign.
James, I sincerely hope the SNP kick you out at the earliest opportunity for being a petty small minded individual that behaves like a child when you can't get your own way, a tiny wee mini apprentice Stuart Campbell greetin to your followers on the internet is the place for you
ReplyDelete" Hiya Chris! "
DeleteWhy don't you return to the back room of the Dog and Duck with your mates and try and work out what your party's purpose is.
DeleteFwiw, I think you'll be absorbed into Scottish Reform by the end of the year.