Friday, July 21, 2023

Abject humiliation for Keir Starmer in Uxbridge by-election casts doubt over whether Labour's national poll lead has any real substance to it at all

I know Labour and commentators sympathetic to Starmer will attempt to dismiss the shock Uxbridge by-election win for the Tories as a freak outcome caused by local factors (ie. the unpopularity of Sadiq Khan's Ultra Low Emission Zone).  As I write this, the results of the other two by-elections have yet to be announced, but it looks virtually certain that the Tories will lose both, including Selby, which was a much tougher nut for Labour to crack.

But ask yourself this - would Labour have failed in any by-election in a relatively marginal seat like Uxbridge in the mid-90s when Blair was heading for power?  Of course they wouldn't.  No matter what the local difficulties, Labour would have stormed through effortlessly because the public had simply decided that they'd had enough of the Tories, that they liked Labour enough, and that they wanted a change of government.  Something is very different this time, notwithstanding the opinion polls, because somehow the Tories are still able to get a hearing and don't have to scratch too hard to find a way to win in a constituency that Labour should easily have taken on a uniform national swing.

And of course this is also a huge psychological blow for Labour in the here and now, because it will drain away the momentum that Starmer would otherwise have generated from the Selby result. One result offsets (perhaps more than offsets) the impact of the other, and that will perhaps be something of a relief for the SNP and the rest of the Scottish independence movement.  It's also, rather comfortingly, a horrific setback for the Labour Right's behind-the-scenes wannabe Robespierres, most notably the grotesque Luke Akehurst.

Uxbridge & South Ruislip by-election result (20th July 2023):

Conservatives 45.2% (-7.4)
Labour 43.6% (+6.0)
Greens 2.9% (+0.7)
Reclaim 2.3% (n/a)
Liberal Democrats 1.7% (-4.6)
SDP 0.8% (n/a)
Independent - Hamilton 0.7% (n/a)
Count Binface 0.6% (+0.5)
Independent - Phaure 0.6% (n/a)
Rejoin EU 0.3% (n/a)
Let London Live 0.3% (n/a)
Independent - Bell 0.3% (n/a)
Christian Peoples Alliance 0.3% (n/a)
UKIP 0.2% (-0.4)
Climate 0.2% (n/a)
Monster Raving Loony 0.1% (-0.2)
Independent - Joseph 0.0% (n/a)

*  *  *

I launched the Scot Goes Pop fundraiser for 2023 a few weeks ago, and the running total has now passed £2100.  The target figure is £8500, however, so there's still quite some distance to travel.  If you'd like to help Scot Goes Pop continue by making a donation, please click HERE.  Many thanks to everyone who has donated so far.

11 comments:

  1. Turnouts were 44, 45 and 46%.
    Isn’t this abnormally low for by-elections?
    A portent for GE 24? Labour campaigners and voters massively demotivated by Sir Kid Starver. Independenistas massively demotivated by devolutionist, NuSNP.

    As a side note. A 25 year old MP. Just what we need.
    He’ll be able to channel all that life and work experience, those challenges and difficulties he’s overcome … oh yeh.
    Perfect fodder for modern politics. He’ll do whatever the whips dictate, no matter how preposterous the orders.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Those sound like pretty good turnouts to me. I don’t have a database of historical by elections to check against, but off the top of my head they’re decent.

      Is the Rutherglen by election on? I bet the turnout there is less than these three in England. Why? Scunnered Yessers.

      Delete
    2. No the Rutherglen election is not yet on. It would depend on how people vote in the recall petition.

      Delete
    3. Anonymous. Turnouts in by elections since 2021 are as follows. Wakefield by-election was 39%, Tiverton and Honiton was 52%, Stretford Urmston 26%, Southend West 24%, West Lankashire 31%, Old Bexley and Sidcup 33%, North Shropshire 46%, Hartlepool 43%, Chesham and Amersham 52%, Batley and Spen 48%, and Airdrie and Shotts 34%.

      So in sum I'd say these turnouts are toward the upper end of the normal range.

      Delete
  2. Could I please appeal to people attempting to leave comments on this blog to sign in to use a Google account or at the very least to use a name. The pending list of comments has become an absolute joke in recent weeks, with 70%+ of attempted comments clearly coming from the same three anonymous posters, who can variously be described as astroturfers or concern trolls. It's getting to the point where there's probably the occasional genuine comment I'm not allowing through because I'm conditioned to think almost all anonymous comments are coming from the trolls.

    There's no guarantee your comment will be published if you use a name, but the chances will be a lot higher.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Based on some

      RP

      Delete
    2. The highest commendation that can be given.

      You've gained a reader.

      RP

      Delete
  3. I suppose the lesson for all parties is the danger of getting too far 'ahead' of voters in terms of things like ULEZ. People are willing to sign up to ideas in the abstract - and I think global warming and clean air are things people worry about - but when the policy means you have to buy a new car then it can put you off voting for a party.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Arguably the real lesson is that both the threat and effects of global warming are running far ahead of the voters, meaning in the immortal words of Keir Starmer that "tough choices" have to be made.

      Delete
    2. Tough choices like throwing Saddiq under the bus.

      Starmer’s a cringing toady, but he does at least have his eyes on the one and only prize in English politics: a majority in Westminster. To get there, he has to crawl over mountains of deplorably right wing voters. Whether that’s his passion or his calculation is academic until said majority is secured.

      I preferred Corbyn, too. But he left Labour in one hell of a deep hole.

      Delete