Monday, December 2, 2024

Is an early Holyrood election actually in the interests of any of the opposition parties?

I don't take seriously all the chatter about the Budget failing and an early Holyrood election being called, because past history shows that a resolution is generally found - even if it happens very theatrically at the last minute.  However, the best way to judge the true level of danger in these situations is to ignore what opposition parties are saying in public and consider whether in the case of each party an early election actually serves their own self-interest.

Labour:  Even for Labour it's not a straightforward equation.  They would undoubtedly gain a large number of seats in any early election, but it's unlikely to be the clear-cut victory they were starting to take for granted only a few months ago, so there's a danger of looking like a firework that fizzled. That might drain momentum away from them as they look ahead to the 2026 election, which under the rules would still take place.  On the other hand, they might get into government, which is the ultimate goal for any party, but that would almost certainly require a deal with the Tories and possibly with Reform UK as well.  That would be bound to complicate their 2026 campaign, ie. "a vote for Labour is a vote for the Tories and Farage".

Conservatives: Without question an early election is not in the Tories' best interests.  They would lose up to half their seats, would drop to third place or possibly fourth, and would see Reform UK open up a bridgehead against them.  The chance of having some power or influence within a new unionist government surely doesn't outweigh all of those negatives.  So in a rational world, if there looked to be any danger of the SNP government falling, they would head off the danger by abstaining somewhere along the line.  In practice it's very difficult for them to do that, though, because it would damage their anti-SNP-ultra tough guy image.

Liberal Democrats: On paper an early election is very clearly in the Lib Dems' interests, because they would stand to gain seats, and would have at least a chance of a share in power.  So it's interesting that they seem to at least be theoretically open to a deal (remember they also saved the SNP's bacon when other parties tried to prevent Kate Forbes from becoming Deputy First Minister).  Maybe party finances are the explanation - it could be the Lib Dems have limited resources and would prefer to save them for one big push in 2026.

Greens: It's not simple for the Greens, because polls often suggest they would see some progress in an early election, but that progress wouldn't be dramatic, and they have to weigh that against the fact that they currently hold the balance of power, and might hand that privileged position to Reform UK on a plate if they bring down the SNP government.  For that reason, my guess is that an SNP-Green deal will rescue the Budget, with the second most likely escape route being an SNP-Lib Dem deal (even though the latter doesn't make intuitive sense).

24 comments:

  1. Seen someone comment: No Party wants an early election as they're currently all skint.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Also most people don't know that due to the Scotland Act 1998 if an extraordinary election occurs due to circumstances like the failure of a budget, it doesn't alter the date of the next ordinary election. So we would have an election in both 2025 & 2026.

      Delete
    2. Can you see labour wanting to be in power before the next SGE? Most tories / lib dem as are trying to bale out of their local Authority powers as they don’t want to be holding the baby come next council elections. If the SNP have any sense they should say no thanks rather than grap the responsibility payment.

      Delete
  2. SNP could conceivably gain from an early election as the loss of seats might be the kick up the arse that they need to re focus. If they got their act together, they could do well in a 2026 election after people had been exposed to Labour, Reform and the toxic tories for a year. It would however take bottle, guile and political nous. So, probably not happening.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Doubt they would be able to afford 2 elections so close together. They aren't cheap and the SNP aren't exactly flush with cash at present, even needing to let some of their HQ staff go.

      Delete
    2. SNP could conceivably gain from an early election as the loss of seats might be the kick up the arse that they need to re focus.

      Why? They just had a massive loss of seats, and they've expected for a while that another one is coming in 2026. Their response has been to shrug and hope for the best.

      Delete
  3. One party with pockets which run Tesla-deep is Reform. Thankfully, for now, they don’t have a say in Holyrood. This will change in a big way, however, and they will prove to be a problem.

    ReplyDelete
  4. Alex Neil on Twitter: "Shannon Donoghue must apologise to Alba members for this slander. Not acceptable to spread lies like this"

    Alex Neil is always right about everything and this is no exception. Shannon Donoghue is a wrong 'un.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Did she used to be on that TV show Beverley Hills 92310? I never watched it cause it was total crap.

      Delete
  5. More precisely than whether an early election is “in their interest”, the crucial question is whether they “believe” an early election is in their interest. Because politicians, as everyone, have a high capacity for self-delusion, and may gallop headlong into an election that they believe will be to their advantage when objectively the situation is otherwise. On top of there needs to be a distinction made between what is in party interest, and the interest of individual politicians making the decision

    ReplyDelete
  6. John Swinney has put SNP into a good place for the election.

    It's credible that SNP could form the next government.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Indeed. Swinney has certainly exceeded my expectations.

      Delete
    2. Aye right. Bet you were singing his praises the day your last fella was forced out. What’s huz name. The patently useless one you were sure had grown into the rĂ´le.

      Delete
  7. there is a difference between - cleaning the floor - and re-arranging the dirt on it. What change could there be from an early election?

    Unionist grifters wedded to blighty for their pensions; fake nate grifters doing the same; a death cult laughingly called "the greens", and the new kids on the block the "super anglo little englander fucking bastard party"

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Much to my frustration, the Greens are polling well. I doubt it’s because of their policies or performance, or I hope not! Presumably it’s the SNP’s slump and the general sense among the young that we must do something to save the environment.

      Delete
    2. "Death cult" here used in the modern sense of "thing I'm not keen on"

      Delete
    3. I think their leadership is as cliquey and mad as Alba’s.

      Why did they force out Andy Wightman? He was Scotland’s best land reformer! The only voice in Holyrood on the issue.

      Delete
  8. And then another one twelve months later!

    ReplyDelete
  9. Whether the HR election is in ‘25 or ‘26, clearly the nationalist charlatans have had their day.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Yes, I agree. Those fanatical British Nationalist charlatans are well past their use-by-date.

      Delete
  10. Good analysis James. Where I deviate from it is that I think that Russell Findlay and his Tories rather than Patrick Harvie and his Greens will cut the deal with the SNP. The Tories need a win of some sort and getting something in the budget that is tangibly theirs sets them up to pitch for votes in 2026 as a positive opposition.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. JK appreciates your boot-licking - particularly as it helps him avoid addressing the Wingsian idea of an SNP - Lab coalition.

      Delete
    2. I addressed that only a few days ago. Is the problem that I *disagreed* with Campbell on that subject? Apologies, I forgot that wasn't allowed.

      Delete
  11. O/T James, but there's an interesting article on the Irish election polling.

    https://pollingindicator.com/#validation

    ReplyDelete