Sunday, December 29, 2024

Find Out Now! Find Out How? Find Out MOP MY BROW! Another pro-independence majority in compelling end-of-year poll

Should Scotland be an independent country? (Find Out Now / Sunday National, 17th-24th December 2024)

Yes 52% (-)
No 48% (-)

Obviously no poll showing an outright Yes lead can ever be considered disappointing, but there is one negative point here - there's been more or less no rise in the Yes vote since the previous Find Out Now poll in October.  (I say 'more or less', because if rounded to one decimal place, the Yes vote has increased slightly from 51.8% to 52.3%.)  That means this poll does not really corroborate the trend in the recent Norstat poll showing a big jump for Yes, thus leaving open the possibility the Norstat poll could yet end up looking like an outlier.  That said, even at around the time of the previous Find Out Now poll, Norstat had Yes at 50%, which was an unusually high figure for that firm.

There's also a "settled will" klaxon to be sounded, because Find Out Now have been polling on independence for years, and all but one of their polls have shown a clear Yes lead.  So if the Find Out Now methodology is broadly correct, the goal of a "sustained" Yes lead that the SNP sometimes talk about is not some kind of imagined future - it's what we already have in the here and now.

A hypothetical question in the poll asking how respondents would vote on independence if Nigel Farage becomes Prime Minister shows a whopping Yes lead of 60% to 40%. As has been well rehearsed recently, hypothetical questions do not necessarily produce reliable results, but I think this particular one may be in a slightly different category.  Unlike Brexit, a Reform UK government wouldn't fade from view.  Voters would be seeing Prime Minister Farage on their TV screens every day.  The reminders would be endless, so it's entirely possible that a massive Yes surge would happen for real.

*  *  *

Poll commissions, poll analysis, election analysis, podcasts, videos, truly independent political commentary - that's Scot Goes Pop, running since 2008 and currently the fifth most-read political blog in Scotland.  It's only been possible due to your incredibly generous support.  If you find the site useful and would like to help it to continue, donations by card payment are welcome HERE, or alternatively donations can be made direct by PayPal.  My PayPal email address is:  jkellysta@yahoo.co.uk

80 comments:

  1. The Jockhaggist extremists are very dangerous.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Three and whoops! How many!!!@#@£

      Delete
    2. Eton College dunce speaks !

      Delete
  2. Find Out Now are clearly one of the YES-friendly survey firms: I believe they have published 10 polls on the Scottish question since March 2021 and they all have YES over 50% (once don't knows are excluded).

    However, when rounded the last 6 polls (since March 2023) have YES registered at 52% so this firm is not picking up any change in support.

    ReplyDelete
  3. Like they would scoop out of mushy bit?

    ReplyDelete
  4. Do Find Ouf Now and Norstat both use 2014 Indyref Recall in their weighting process?

    ReplyDelete
  5. Here's hoping Farage continues to gain large support from English/British nationalist extremists in England. Confrontation between Scotland and England is needed.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. You mean confrontation between Scottish nationalists and England plus the other half of Scots.

      Delete
    2. My word! Such a riposte. I expect you're a very clever person.

      Delete
    3. I just realised that the SNP are not Scotland. This could be a game changer.

      Delete
    4. You aren’t very clever are you.?

      Delete
  6. Still showing pro independence

    ReplyDelete
  7. Standard Indy Question asked by UK Polling company (based in Engerlandshire I believe).
    Try harder.
    Ta.

    ReplyDelete
  8. Lol.
    Dumb, insignificant wee Yoon, ignoring basic facts about a completely standard Indy Poll and desperately grasping at the next one.
    Nice.

    ReplyDelete
  9. Also 60/40 to Yes if Nigel Farage becomes PM. As previously covered we know the issues with hypothetical polling but interesting to get an idea of how much of the public seem to be opposed in principle. A similar split to the YouGov poll earlier this year asking about support linked to EU membership and that Norstat one about a wellbeing economy.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Absolutely.
      The more that the Scottish voting public think about BrexSHITTY UK remaining outside the EU and the strong possibility of a Farage/Reform UK Govt, the more they turn to Scottish Independence.
      We need to keep on pushing these narratives every chance we get.

      Delete
    2. Dave Francis spouting ever more bullshit!

      Delete
    3. You REALLY don't matter, you irrelevant Yoon Tit.
      Happy New Year, pal.

      Delete
    4. Dave Francis, a real Nat numpty.

      Delete
    5. The earliest possibility Farage could realistically become Prime Minister is 2029. Is the plan to do nothing until then?

      Delete
  10. Try to keep current, sonny.
    Three out of the last four Indy Polls have Yes on or above 50%.
    Happy Holidays 👍

    ReplyDelete
  11. I see Pete Wishart is calling for a Constitutional Convention in the Scotsman.

    Is that the same one Nicola Sturgeon announced in 2020 or the one the SNP Conference voted to happen in 2023?

    ReplyDelete
  12. As the panic spreads among unionists WOS has been given orders. 1100 words of misleading nonsense with very selective stats trying to rubbish recent polls and the upwards trend in Indy support. Campbell, up to his usual standards, labels readers of the National as intellectually retarded. He is stupid enough to think that putting another word in front of retarded makes it acceptable. It’s not, in any circumstances. And of course much of his post is just a personal attack on NS and a misleading rant about the gender issue. There is a delicious irony that when he uses the offensive expressions in the second last para of his article, he does so to try to describe the National and it’s readers, but in reality it describe his own blog and his own readership. Wonderful. 26 Holyrood elections. De facto referendum and let’s get on with the confrontation. Start with energy.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. WoS is now the go-to for a collection of conspiracy nutters and so-called 'Yessers' who are as like to vote Unionist - particularly Reform - as anything else.
      And, of course, plenty of genuine Yoonionists who find it a very friendly, pleasant place to be.
      Campbell is now just a seething, directionless, hopeless and POWERLESS mess.
      Sad to watch the descent of a once useful resource for Independence, into a fetid, festering cesspit.

      Delete
    2. Oops.
      The above post was from me.

      Delete
    3. It's a very good headline for the front page. It stands out and would make anyone think. It doesn't matter if there won't be a GE until 2029 and on this Campbell is allowing his prejudice to dictate his thinking which is indeed, intellectual, errrrr, diminishment.

      He does still do good articles occasionally; this wasn't one of them.

      Delete
    4. Campbell is an irrelevance, he just hasn't realized yet.

      Delete
    5. If the fight is back on, he'll be there. And more powerful than before.

      Delete
    6. Oh he'll be there all right. Campaigning for a No vote, just as he campaigned for Labour in July. He won't be powerful, though, people will be pointing and laughing.

      Delete
    7. I mean looking at literally any measurement Wings is considerably more read than this blog for example & probably is still the most viewed political blog in Scotland.

      Delete
    8. You believe that? It’s not as he claims . A small group numbering at most a couple of hundred go onto his site multiple times daily, and he claims readership numbers using an utterly discredited methodology. That has been known for some time. It has been referred to on here. His principal talent is extracting money from the gullible. Credit where it’s due, he is very good at that.

      Delete
    9. Anon@5:18, You believe that? What evidence do you have for how many visitors to his site are 'repeat offenders'? Sounds very much like wish fulfillment on your part.

      Delete
    10. "using an utterly discredited methodology. That has been known for some time. It has been referred to on here"

      I have noticed whenever that's brought up those disputing it don't mention an alternative methodology or make any attempt to reveal what supposedly the true numbers are. Funny that.

      Delete
    11. It's also the methodology used in claiming this blog's readership

      Delete
  13. Keep dreaming Dave Francis.
    🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣

    ReplyDelete
  14. As a general observation these recent polls have the Unionist activists in a right tizzy to use the language they'd use. They're attacking anyone who makes pro-indy postings or contradicts unionist ones on a regular basis.

    Don't be fooled - they're not SNP, Alba or Greens, though they'd like you to think they are. They're cowardly false flags and I despise them - I don't have any problem with genuine unionists making their case.

    ReplyDelete
  15. Aye , indeed the Britnat unionists are in a richt "tizzy" . They will dredge up any silly anti-Scottish half truth to try to deny oor progress.
    They are feart!
    Alba gu brath!

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. An' fit's wrang wi being a male bovine? Kye are gey important tae oor rural economy !
      Alba gu brath!

      Delete
    2. Ventilation is required for the little area to the rear of my room

      Delete
  16. You appear to find making it up very easy. The past is exactly that. You live in it. No surprise there. Away and stick your tongue up Charlie boys erse.

    ReplyDelete
  17. Ha ha ! You couldn't post properly!

    ReplyDelete
  18. As Pete Wishart said:

    https://archive.is/eq1jQ

    "the policy that we crafted was an amalgam of all sorts of different things and it ended up looking slightly absurd and I don’t think it had any real credibility with independence supporters"

    but as he then said:

    "This time around, we’ve got to get it absolutely right,"

    I can't wait, can you? I bet you're wetting yourself!

    ReplyDelete
  19. An the Britnats still think their wonderful union will persist. Hoo wrang they are.
    Fool Britannia!

    ReplyDelete
  20. I think a very interesting hypothetical question asking how respondents would vote on independence, would be this:

    "If the SNP actually got totally serious about Independence and genuinely made it the only important policy, how would you vote?"

    and include how definitely would people vote, as I think IF the SNP went Full Metal Jacket on Independence they'd get back the missing 500,000 voters. And probably a few more as well.

    Unfortunately they're probably too scaredy-cat to ask that question, as they're running scared of the Unionist parties accusing them of campaigning for Independence - their actual reason for being.

    Gwaarrrkk buck buck buck buck ...

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Yi2- dismal. Still I’m sure your mammy thought you were awfy clever.

      Delete
    2. False flag Anon at 10:03 PM

      Delete
    3. This was presumably funny in your head? Bearing in mind your recent off the wall comments we shouldn’t be surprised. Take some time away. Your contributions on here, poor at the best of times, are now simply rubbish.

      Delete
    4. @Yi2 (who's a lot more interesting and worth replying to than you, wanker anon)

      Good idea but beware of writing leading questions like our "Believe in Scotland" friend, Macintyre-Kemp. If he believed a little more in Scotland, he might have the confidence to take his finger off the scales when he's polling!

      I'd try to word such a question more like:

      "If the SNP promised to declare Scottish Independence if they win the next election, how would you vote?"

      Simpler and no wiggle room for them to slither out of. "Well, we wrote a very sharply worded Section 30 request…"

      Delete
    5. Anon at 7:55 AM
      Yes, my question isn't well phrased - it'd need someone like SGP to put it together. Your question is more straightforward than mine.

      Delete
  21. This just made IFS spew out his supper lol

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. It’s surprising your parents let you stay up this late at night.

      Delete
    2. False flag Anon at 9:26 PM

      Delete
  22. Good poll, think we are probably sitting just over the 50% mark of the flawed eligible electorate able to vote on Scotlands future, many of whom never will have Scotlands best interests at heart.
    On that topic. I received a copy of Alf Baird Doun Hauden for Christmas. It’s essential reading for everyone concerned with moving our will from wish to reality
    https://www.amazon.co.uk/Doun-Hauden-Socio-Political-Determinants-Scottish-Independence-ebook/dp/B086ZTRXM8

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. "many of whom never will have Scotlands best interests at heart"

      If they live here then of course they'll have Scotland's - and therefore their own - best interests at heart. It's just a question of them working out what IS in Scotland's best interest - and for that to be Independence. Hearts and minds; hearts and minds.

      Delete
    2. I hear you, YI2, and that's the way we should still address them. It's important to be magnanimous when winning hearts and minds.

      But we shouldn't delude ourselves that any amount of appealing to their better angels will overcome their own allegiance to England, to which Scotland is just the extension to the Lake District. Not everyone who lives here is aligned with Scotland's best interests, not by a long shot. Let's not waste our time squeezing stones.

      Scots are Scotland.

      Delete
    3. Lets be honest: Most people don't give a shit and will vote purely based on what they believe benefits their own self interest and the money in their pocket.

      If you can convince people that they will be financially better off via independence they will vote for it. Your average Joe on the street prioritises that over any supposed loyalty.

      Delete
  23. False flag Anon at 4:28 PM

    ReplyDelete
  24. The conundrum, the movement is pretty much split into two camps.

    Camp 1: The SNP in Government are the only viable path to achieve independence. We need to keep voting for them & hope they can be changed from within to reprioritise independence. It will take too long to build up any kind of alternative and if the SNP lose power independence will be for all intents and purposes dead for the foreseeable future.

    Camp 2: We've been voting SNP for independence for over a decade. We've been marched up the hill countless times with indyref2 supposedly being just around the corner but then never materialising. We literally had the best circumstances we could ever have dreamed of: Brexit chaos, Boris Johnson, countless Westminster scandals but all were squandered.

    I'm tired of being misled, I'm tired of my vote being taken for granted and I'm fresh out of "hope". If the SNP want my vote they'll need to work for it, just "keeping the dream alive" or spouting nonsense that a UK Government will eventually give in because reasons won't cut it. They need to be bold, anything less then I won't be voting for them again.

    ReplyDelete
  25. So you clearly know what you are going to do. Not much of a conundrum for you it seems. Welcome to Farage land. Supporting Indy is now treason.

    ReplyDelete
  26. Looks like the same results as a poll in 2014.

    ReplyDelete
  27. Next year Upland Sheep Farmers and Laundrette Workers for Yes will be dead, dead, dead for 11 years. The marchy march people gave up a couple of years ago as the last gasp. The polls are unchanged and the bald man with spectacles goes forth, specular in his non-existence.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. I’m sure that made sense sitting in your single room alone.

      Delete
  28. I suppose that as last years independence campaign hinged around a bit of paper about Corporation tax and no-one read it because it was shite, in 2025 it will be loft lagging. Independence = insulation.

    ReplyDelete
  29. After the GE humping, when the SNP lost 39 of their 48 Westminster seats, it’s quite comical to see some Nats still going on about independence.
    You’d have thought they’d at least have had the sense to put it on the back burner for a bit.

    Dear oh dear.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. You seem to struggle with the basics of the electoral system and it’s vagaries. Perhaps you will cover this in third year at school. Meantime I heard your mum tell you to tidy your room. Get to it silly boy.

      Delete
    2. Anon@9:55am,
      A Nat living in complete denial, unable to accept the “dream” has died (it died in 2014).

      Delete
    3. Anon at 8:52
      So............after the Yoonionist Parties were TOTALLY humped in the 2015 GE, when SNP won 56 of 59 WM Seats - all the subservient, cringing wee Yoon-Tossers like you stopped talking about their 'precious union' and 'put it on the back burner for a bit'?
      Don't remember that happening, pal.
      Because it didn't.
      Grow up.

      Delete
    4. Stop embarrassing yourself Francis, by continuing to spout utter nonsense.

      Delete
    5. The Dave Francis character seems to have rather a high opinion of himself.

      Delete
    6. Lol.
      Anon Yoon Tossers @ 11:23 and 11:34 -
      Do you share the same, solitary wee neuron, or is it on its Christmas Holidays?
      The latter, I think.
      Dumb and Dumber, eat yer heart out.............

      Delete
    7. Dave Francis accusing others of being tossers!!
      🤣🤣🤣

      Ye really couldnae make it up!

      Delete
    8. Anon at 10.03. Gosh. All the evidence indicates the opposite. Silly billy boy. I see the queen thought your lot were a shower of vankers. Deliciously funny. Away and play with your wee flute.

      Delete
  30. I did think that the Yes movement was a Colgate ad but it did all disappear about one week after the 2014 referendum, unlike my brighter whiter smile. The dusty blogs are interesting bits of history for wankers.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. The queen thought you and your ilk were arseholes out on your wee marches. She got that right. Away and wipe yourself.

      Delete
  31. https://youtu.be/rU9f04Zo-nE?si=lggdsiZtsT6qb6N0

    ReplyDelete
  32. Takes one to know…

    ReplyDelete
  33. Anon at 8:51, 52 and 58 ... Have you calmed down now after your wee tantrum?

    ReplyDelete