Albeit at the severe risk of turning this blog into Plato-Watch, it's hard to resist reposting another exchange from Political Betting, because this one really took the biscuit. For the uninitiated, Plato is an extremely right-wing poster who is as supportive of the Tory party as, for example, I am of the SNP. But she curiously feels that her views should carry more weight than others, because she is a "floating voter", a "neutral" and "exactly the sort of person Labour has to win back if it is ever to hold office again". For the avoidance of doubt, this claim of neutrality is in no sense an 'ironic' thing - she becomes genuinely prickly when anyone casts doubt on it.
Anyway, this is what unfolded yesterday evening...
Chris g00 : I thought you had said that there were major changes, but that’s fine by me. Just remember if we ever get a Labour government back & they bring in guillotine motions, your attitude today.
But on that note. Adios.
Plato : "if we ever get a Labour government back"
Won’t be my vote.
Me : "Ever"? Could you - somehow - explain how that remark can possibly be reconciled with your repeated and apparently serious claims to be a “floating voter”?
Tim B : Go for it JK!
I’m somewhat curious about that myself.
Plato : Some people just don’t get non-tribal voting.
My views have never really changed - the parties and leaders have shifted about in an attempt to win mine and I voted accordingly.
Me : "Some people just don’t get non-tribal voting."
Must be, because - call me wacky - I would define ‘non-tribal voting’ as being open to voting for a party if circumstances change, rather than, for example, saying that you would never, ever vote for a Labour government, as you have just done.
Incidentally, I had to reconstruct my first comment from memory as it has since been 'mysteriously' deleted. My own fault, though - I should have called her a "t******b" or a "g*******z" and then I would have been absolutely fine.