I was just watching a "highlights" video of Donald Trump's speech to Congress (if that's not a contradiction in terms) and I found it genuinely chilling when he said he was going to get his hands on Greenland "one way or another" and JD Vance started chuckling behind him. It instantly called to mind Goebbels or Goering having a little snigger on the stage of a Nazi rally while Hitler taunted whichever country he had decided to invade next.
In Trump's first term it was always said that he couldn't really be considered a full-blown fascist because he didn't tick enough of the boxes, such as opposition to democracy and territorial expansionism. The insurrection at the Capitol building obviously called into question the assumption that he wasn't an opponent of democracy, although that incident almost seemed like 'cosplay fascism' because he didn't have the steel to actually see through a proper coup attempt. And the only vague talk of expansionism in the first term related to buying Greenland - I can't recall any suggestion of an invasion after Denmark said no to the proposal.
The Netanyahu regime in Israel actually fits in with the textbook definition of fascism much more comprehensively - it's militaristic, ethnonationalist, perpetually expansionist, genocidal (which only occurs in the most extreme forms of fascism), and its democratic status is questionable due to the apartheid nature of the state. So arguably the main relationship of the US to fascism has been an indirect one via its enthusiastic enabling of Israeli fascism.
But that may be changing if the conquest of Greenland is a serious prospect. Again, the only real question is whether this will prove to be cosplay fascism or the real deal. The Panama Canal, Gaza and Canada are also apparently on Trump's shopping list for an expanded US empire. The threats to Canada are generally taken less seriously than the ones against Greenland and Panama, but it strikes me that Greenland is not exactly contiguous with the US - there's a large expanse of Canada in between. If the strategic location of Greenland makes it so irresistible to Trump, and if the fact that Denmark is a friendly country that already allows US military activity on its territory isn't sufficient for him, it's hard to see why the same logic wouldn't also apply to northern Canada.
Of course there isn't a cat in hell's chance of Canada becoming part of the US, whether Trump realises it or not. But if that's his ambition, it means he's an expansionist on a Napoleonic scale, just as Hitler was. The Empire he envisages would be more than double the geographical size of the present-day US (Canada is actually the larger of the two countries) and it would encompass the vast bulk of a whole continent. That's a fascist prospectus, at the very least.
Some aspects of Trumps presidency are certainly concerning, James.
ReplyDeleteThat's why in Scotland we are fortunate that John Swinney is in charge at this time.
John Swinney provides steady and consistent leadership of the SNP focusing on well thought through policy and governance of Scotland.
In a world where Donald Trump is U.S. president, Swinney’s measured approach offers stability.
His experience and careful decision-making ensure continuity and reliability in uncertain political times.
Swinney reminds me very much of Mandela.
DeleteHe may not be a Mandela but he is handling Ukraine well.
DeleteWhat on earth do you mean "he may not be a Mandela"?
DeleteWhat I mean is that he may not be as great a leader as Mandela.
DeleteI'm sick to death of this infantile anti-SNP crap. "May not be as great a leader as Mandela", Jesus Christ.
DeleteOh, you're absolutely right—how *dare* anyone suggest that John Swinney isn't on the same level as Nelson Mandela? I mean, sure, Mandela spent 27 years in prison fighting apartheid and then led a nation through reconciliation, but whats so great about that? The sheer *injustice* of not putting them in the same sentence with equal reverence—shocking, really.
DeleteAgree 100%
DeleteMore utter dross btl.
DeleteChina not mincing their words today either - not their usual woolly sit on the fence rhetoric. This guy is genuinely dangerous to world peace in a way that tinpot dictator Putin can only dream of.
ReplyDeleteWhat’s their beef?
DeleteCanada plus the USA would become the biggest country in the world, something sure to appeal to Trump’s infantile view of things. Maybe manifest destiny works to the north as well as from sea to shining sea. Just a few pesky inhabitants to bump off if they get in the way.
ReplyDeleteNonsense.
DeleteUnfortunately, as I couldn't sleep this morning, I heard most of his speech live on the BBC World Service. He is a poor speaker, and waffles on and on and on. Someone said he has the speaking skills of a twelve year old, as in his fairly basic sentence structure, his limited vocabulary, and his repeating the last few words of each sentence. However, it is what he says, rather than how he says it, that is so astonishing, eg his talk of taking Greenland. He doesn't have the vocal power or passion of dear old Adolf, but the many standing ovations, the cheering and whooping of the Republicans in the room, and their chants of "U .. S .. A .. U .. S .. A ..." was worryingly reminiscent of the film footage of the 1930s Nuremberg rallies.
ReplyDeleteJames: US firm "BlackRock to buy Hong Kong firm's Panama Canal port stake amid Trump pressure" - Reuters. If so, that probably takes Panama down quite a few pegs in terms of risk assessment per your SGP post above.
ReplyDeleteI think that it has now reached the stage that Trump's threats really do have to be taken seriously. The man is extremely dangerous.
ReplyDeleteAnon@ 9.43 Not nearly as dangerous as your halfwit brain.
ReplyDeleteOr your quarter-wit brain.
DeletePugh! Pugh! Barney McGrew! Cuthbert! Dibble! Grubb say otherwise,soyboy.
DeleteTrump has already bought a lot of Scotland and trumped over Aberdeensire Council a while ago.
ReplyDelete