Just a short one this, but it's prompted by Alba HQ's resident stripling Robert Reid having one of his periodical rants about me on Twitter last night. He obviously drops by to this blog now and again, and his rage at seeing any sort of alternative to HQ propaganda always seems to get the better of him.
However, he's more than a tad hapless in the way he lashes out. Last time around he was feigning incredulity that anyone could possibly doubt the integrity of the process that led to my expulsion from Alba given that "ordinary Alba members" had supposedly made the decision - but all I had to do was point out that only four Alba members had voted to expel me, and exactly 50% of them were either his own girlfriend or his own mum. He couldn't dispute that because he knows it's true and he knows it's in the minutes.
This time he was harrumphing about me supposedly "lying" when I criticised Alba for their irresponsible plans to split the pro-independence vote on the constituency ballot next year, abandoning the sensible list-only strategy from 2021. Reid insisted that no decision has been taken yet and that Alba members will ultimately decide. But yet again, it's his own girlfriend that's the problem for him, because Christina Hendry has already announced that she intends to be the Alba candidate in the constituency seat of Banffshire and Buchan Coast. And it has to be said she doesn't seem to be terribly interested in Alba members' thoughts on the matter - she reckons she's inheriting the candidacy from her Uncle Alex by right of "Salmond blood", to use her own bizarre Game of Thrones-style language.
When I put that point to Reid, he defensively tried to make out that what Ms Hendry had said to the press was only provisional and "pending membership approval". To put it mildly, that does not ring true, because when Alex Salmond himself first announced his plans to stand in Banffshire and Buchan Coast, there was no deference to the ultimate sovereignty of Alba members - it was just something he had decided to do and that was an end to the matter. His party, his decision, full stop.
Anyway, Reid's ongoing obsession with me has made me think back to my previous interactions with him. They're extremely limited, because his election to the NEC in autumn 2022 coincided with me being voted off the body. However, he did phone me up out of the blue once - it was a year ago, in February 2024. Apparently Alex Salmond had got extremely upset about a newspaper article written by Conor Matchett, which suggested that polling showed Salmond was less popular in Scotland than Nigel Farage. He wanted a sharp reply to be sent to Matchett, but neither he nor anyone else in HQ could actually find the relevant numbers in the data tables of the poll, so in desperation Reid turned to me. (I suspect the poor lad may have been getting the hairdryer treatment all morning.) I had to be the bearer of bad news, because the poll did basically show what Matchett had claimed it showed.
Nevertheless, Reid did his best to follow his leader's instructions, and sent an email to Matchett with a suitably indignant tone, even though the facts were stacked against him. He forwarded the email to me, and one section stands out as particularly significant -
"Firstly ALBA are at 3 per cent on the regional list polling question of the latest Redfield Wilton poll as shown below. This is the ONLY section of voting for which ALBA have been traditionally prompted by pollsters (ie shown on their list of parties on polling questions). That is understandable since previously ALBA only intended to stand on the regional list for Holyrood."
Never again let it be pretended that Alba hasn't mutated from its original billing as a responsible list-only party. OK, political parties are allowed to change, but by the same token members and supporters of a party are allowed to be upset about having been sold a false prospectus.
Another intriguing titbit is that Reid once spontaneously contacted me with a "keep up the good work" message after I wrote a blogpost urging Alba to only stand in the two seats where they had incumbent MPs at the Westminster general election. He told me that wasn't all that far away from HQ's own thinking - which surprised me, because my impression from having previously been on the NEC was that Alex Salmond wanted Alba to make a big intervention in the general election, which of course is exactly what happened in the end.
I can only speculate, but I wonder if "HQ's thinking" was code for "McEleny's thinking". If so, that might indicate there was a difference of view between McEleny and Mr Salmond on election strategy. In spite of the much-vaunted "telepathic link" between the two men, McEleny was sometimes surprisingly blunt in his criticisms of Mr Salmond. When I last saw McEleny in August (only a few weeks before he arbitrarily suspended me from the party), he very directly stated that Mr Salmond was living well beyond Alba's means in terms of the hotel, travel and food expenses he was racking up, and that someone was going to need to have a word with him. "It's fine if Alex gets a big gig like Question Time in London", but other than that, major cutbacks were going to have to be made.
That of course is one of the issues that has caused so much hurt and upset - other Alba NEC members, and indeed Alba rank-and-file members, have been working tirelessly for the party out of their own pocket, and they haven't known what to make of a select few at the top living the high life thanks to party funds which should really have been used for campaigning purposes.
McEleny also gave a possible clue in August to the leadership's plans about standing in Holyrood constituency seats next year. He talked of the possibility of standing in one constituency per electoral region, which would mean splitting the pro-indy vote in eight constituency seats across Scotland. He then caught himself and said with some alarm "I'm just speaking hypothetically here, James", which led me to think he wasn't speaking hypothetically at all - although I suspect eight constituency seats may be more of a floor than a ceiling.
* * *
Coming up in future installments of "THE ALBA FILES"...
* Straight-Talking And Totally Unfiltered: How Shannon Donoghue and Chris Cullen explained their refusal to give rank-and-file Alba members decision-making powers, or even any basic information about decisions taken at the monthly NEC meetings
* McEleny's campaign of "disciplinary" revenge after evidence of the 2023 election-rigging started to leak
* Tasmina Writes It All Down And Then Hits "Send"
...plus much, much more. Stay tuned.
His party, his decision, full stop. That's Alba.
ReplyDeleteThe only open question is "who's next?"
Alba was just a grift for Salmond and Tasmina.
ReplyDeleteTasmina’s family made money from merchandising.
And Alba financed Alex and Tas’s five star lifestyle. Hotels, meals and entertaining friends and contacts
Members should question the amount of spending on travel, hotels and meals
It is 10s of thousands of pounds
Strange that the BBC and WOS aren’t all over this, unless of course they see Alba as a useful idiot in their SNP Baaad campaign
DeleteIt is strange that no journalist has reported any of the troubles in Alba
DeleteEither Alba really do not matter or they are useful
The Salmond bullying should have been of interest as it backs up what Sturgeon said about him.
Wings knows what went on but turns a blind eye
Anon at 12.12 pm ... not contradicting you but can you prove any of that? Making assertions is one thing but providing proof is another.
DeleteI wouldn't say the media was exactly cheering Alba on when they acted like they didn't exist. It seems to me more like ignorance than complicity. The mainstream dismissed Alba as a Salmond stunt and did what little it took to forget about Alba's existence.
DeleteYou don't exactly hear detailed coverage of internal affairs in the Greens, either, let alone the SSP and the other 1%ers.
Prove what? That something isn’t happening? Is this intended as satire or what? Think before you post.
DeleteIf there's no media reports to link to, it'll have to be receipts!
DeleteJM yes look at the accounts.
DeleteAh but SNP Baaad
ReplyDeleteMethinks wee Robbie is being used. It's likely that others are putting him up to sending out the messages they want, but there's no way they want their name connected to them.
ReplyDeleteI'm afraid he's not bright enough to see when he's being played.
He's being played with.
"Salmond blood" lmao. Imagine being like that
ReplyDeleteBlood and soil. Claymores and cosplay. Very serious way to conduct the future of a nation.
DeleteWhen did you see Chris McEleny in person ?
ReplyDeleteI last saw him in August, as clearly stated in the blogpost twice. I did not use the words "in person", because it was a Zoom call.
DeleteYou might want to brush up on your close reading skills.
Sure, but it's still fair to ask when you last met in person, right? They're distinct events. One's in the blog, so already answered. The other's a sensible, independent question.
DeleteI can't really see the relevance of your question, but if you want an answer for the sheer hell of it, I think I last saw him in person in June. It was the day of the Alba manifesto launch in Dundee, and I'm fairly sure that was in June. We didn't really exchange any words that day, he just leaned over my head and gave me a really, really odd look. Of course unbeknown to me, he was already planning action against me by then but had postponed it because of the general election.
DeleteIt was worth asking to get that story! He sounds like a rôle for a good “character actor.” Someone good at awkward looks and pregnant pauses.
DeleteAnd still silence from the candidates who wish to be King/Queen/ interchangeable
ReplyDeleteEven Police Scotland now want to distance themselves from the politically motivated smear campaign known as operation Branchfrom. Don’t expect apologies from the idiots and the liars on here and elsewhere who as recently as today were making false claims of fraud and embezzlement. But sadly damage has been done. Let us not forget the usual suspects on here with their WOS allies spreading disinformation. YIR2? Idiot for Scotland ? Apologise? No chance. The fake rev? Deafening silence from him. Next time they post, assume it’s lies and disinformation.
ReplyDeleteSNP have moved on in any case under Swinney.
DeleteDamage has been done.
DeleteTo Police Scotland's reputation.
DeleteIt’s naive to think SNP have not been damaged. BBC and MSM will be silent on this.
DeleteWe shall abstain from commenting on Operation Branchform.
DeleteOne minute the Police are the bad guys in your conspiracy theory next thing they are distancing themselves from their own work.
DeletePerhaps as you know everything you can tell us where the motorhome is now parked and where the missing £600k is.
Seems the polls disagree. The investigation has gone on so long now most folk I speak to -apart from hard line unionists think the authorities are less than squeaky clean over this -even when wearing gloves and having a tented village outside the Fm house. Who leaked to the news media ?
DeleteAnon at 3.53 pm. There is no missing £600,000, and the Motorhome is an asset in the accounts of the SNP. Why do you think the police have distanced themselves from this sordid smear? Why do you think there has been no prosecution. You are clearly one of the people who have been spreading lies and disinformation. No expectation that you will have the class or the grace to apologise. Toddle off back to WOS.
Delete3.59pm - so the police have been investigating nothing for years. That is what you think. Conspiracy theory top level.
DeleteWhy did the SNP buy a motorhome and park it for years at Murrells mother’s driveway then. You didn’t answer where the motor home is right now.
Care to say where you can find the police statement that they are dropping the charges against the liar Murrell.
Anon at 3.59pm says “ Why do you think there has been no prosecution.” But doesn’t say why he thinks there has been no prosecution. Please spell out your full conspiracy in detail. I’ll share mine with you. The Police have finished their work and sent a report
Deleteto the British controlled Crown Office who have been told not to prosecute anybody but just sit on it for as long a possible.
3:59, 'There is no missing £600k'!!!No, because they have spent it on themselves you clown. Motorhomes to hide in your mother's driveway don't come cheap you know.🤣🤣🤣
DeleteClown? No argument from you, just abuse. You and your mates have been exposed as gullible liars. And even when Police Scotland opt out you lot keep lying. It lets people see you for what you are. Keep it up.
DeletePeter Murrell has been charged with embezzlement => he has to go to court to plead one way or the other because embezzlement is a serious charge. But the Scottish court system is just as backlogged as the NHS.
DeleteAnd in Peter Murrell's case it is no longer a police matter.
DeleteIn the meantime, I believe he has been served a court order banning him from property transactions.
DeletePerhaps you are Alba? Toddle off silly billy, no one is interested in you.
ReplyDeleteNote: The above is a reply to a deleted comment.
DeleteAnon at 4.12. You really this thick? The police have investigated for over three years and have been unable to produce evidence of fraud and embezzlement, but you know better? Tell all. Your bitterness and anger are palpable. You stand exposed as a unionist liar. Away back to WOS.
ReplyDelete