Saturday, August 22, 2026

Warning - Danger - MASSIVE BLACK HOLE APPROACHING and Stew wants to chuck YOUR life savings straight into it - Please learn the lessons of the Dugdale debacle and ca' canny this time

Probably because I grew up during the period in which the Guildford Four and the Birmingham Six were released, I've always been deeply troubled by the persistent recurrence of severe miscarriages of justice and the utter failure of the criminal justice system to learn lessons from past catastrophic mistakes. As long-term readers may know, I'm inclined to the view that Lucy Letby is probably innocent, and my guess is that she will eventually be exonerated and released, but only after a ridiculously long delay of many years, by which time the psychological damage to her will be beyond imagining.  It is inexplicable that the UK system almost always compounds its errors by doubling down on them when it knows from past experience that it will eventually be forced to confront them anyway, by which time the reputational damage to itself will also be that much greater.

When so many people have been wrongly banged up (or even wrongly executed if you go back far enough), the mindset of someone who is consumed with anger at the criminal justice system because not enough people have been jailed for alleged non-violent offences is alien to me.  But that is precisely where Stuart Campbell stands.  If you asked him what his two political priorities are, and if you managed to get an honest answer out of him, he would undoubtedly say the eradication of trans ideology and getting Nicola Sturgeon jailed.  Not independence for Scotland.  Not the elimination of nuclear weapons to secure a future of humanity.  Not the tackling of the climate emergency to ensure humanity has a habitable planet to live on.  Not ending the genocide and offering justice to the people of Gaza.  Not the alleviation of poverty in Scotland.  No, what motivates Stew, what is literally his heart's desire (and everyone reading this knows deep down that this is true) is pointless revenge against a woman he obsessively hates.

There is nothing that can be done about hatred being Stew's political lodestar, or about the grotesque manifestations of that, but I hope it is obvious to most sensible independence supporters, or indeed to anyone who has any form of constructive political aspiration for this country, just how harmful and foolhardy it would be to follow him down that rabbit hole.  His newly-published threats to the police to take legal action unless they prosecute people in the SNP over the 'ring-fenced fund' episode means beyond doubt that he will soon be once again seeking eye-watering amounts of money from his followers (in the ballpark of what would be required to fund a referendum campaign, ironically) to futilely throw away on yet another revenge-driven court case that he simply cannot win.  I hope the Kezia Dugdale debacle at least gives his disciples pause for thought about whether on this occasion the money might be better spent on something more worthwhile, such as, y'know, actually campaigning for Scottish independence.

I'm not even going to 'pick a side' here and say that I either believe or disbelieve Nicola Sturgeon when she says she knew nothing about Murrell's activities.  The question just doesn't interest me because Ms Sturgeon is no longer SNP leader, she is no longer an MSP, she is no longer in frontline politics in any form.  I do personally think she was foolish to recently attack the current SNP leadership after they expended so much political capital defending her to the hilt, and it also grated on me slightly when she tried a fresh variation of the "it's another example of a woman suffering for the actions of a man" soundbite, which I felt was a cheap way of playing to a certain gallery by generically demonising men.  But what she says and does as a private citizen is a matter for her.  The rest of us should get on with living in the political present where the independence cause is firmly in the hands of John Swinney and cannot be affected much by the actions of past leaders.

We are presently standing at a junction where the two possible routes are signposted as "independence" and "other stuff".  Somewhat ironically in view of a cartoon he once published, Stew is gagging to visit the "other stuff" location and wants you to join him there.  Don't be tempted this time.  

*  *  *

I'm still urgently trying to make progress towards my blogging and YouTube videos becoming financially sustainable.  If you'd like to help me continue to create content by becoming a supporter, please check out my Ko-Fi page HERE - it accepts small recurring monthly payments or one-off donations of any amount, and it also accepts a variety of payment methods, including card and PayPal.  A million thanks to everyone who has already contributed.

11 comments:

  1. James,

    I am an independence supporter since I was able to remember and before it was noticeably "cool" which i now believe it is on balance.

    I share a lot of your frustrations that wings seems more inclined to sling down the snp than promoting scottish indepdendemce but truthfully he has a point about these referendum funds. People put money into the pot for a referendum which would undoubtedly be a david amd foliage clash between us and the London state. And we were defrauded from what I can see.

    Can we get rid of whoever degraded us amd move on?

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Why finish your comment with "move on" when quite clearly the one and only thing you *don't* want to do is move on? You want to follow Stew down the "other stuff" path.

      Delete
    2. It’s a matter of do we want to live in a Scotland where criminals find crime pays.

      Delete
    3. Now if you start saying "Scotland will not be ready for independence until...", we'll *know* you're Stew.

      Delete
    4. Hi James,

      I want to nip it in the bud and move on yes. Who agreed to use this money for referendum campaigning? Are these people still in the party?

      Running up a huge campaign fund for a big independence campaign is exactly what we should be doing as we are going to need it against the backdrop of a State hellbent on diminishing it. Our view needs to cut through and that is going to need money and lots of it.

      The managing of funds off of 100,000 members for many years (now down a bit as we know) is off the scale negligent. I have links with catalan movements and they were awash with money with fewer members and had events, campaign material, heck they even had a referendum with the funds they had. What do we have in terms of indy campaign material? Nothing. We had more in the 90s.
      I want to know the funds are in the right hands. Almost has me thinking we have been infiltrated.

      How the hell did we end up spending this fund? It is a disgrace.

      Delete
    5. To add also i could not give one monekys about Sturgeon or anyone else of the past. I want to know that people who made the decision to deceive are no longer making decisions. And I dont think the story has heen adequately explained. I want this sorted and move on.

      Delete
  2. Campbell and Sturgeon are similar in as much as both of them have failed the cause of independence and each, on different scales, has left a legacy of confusion and bitterness that adds to our considerable challenges in gaining our self determination.
    A few misguided people stick to them - their tragedy. Move on !

    ReplyDelete
  3. Self awareness is an attribute sadly lacking these days in all facets of life....notably politics.

    ReplyDelete
  4. Campbell has demonstrated previously at great length that the COPFS is answerable to absolutely no-one. At least that’s the way they want it to appear. If the maxim that the Government and the judiciary should be forever separate is to be followed then is this not a good thing?
    I think on balance of judgment this is generally a strong argument. Governments are fleeting structures. Viktor Orbán gerrymandered the judiciary in Hungary to suit his agenda. Benjamin Netanyahu was trying to flood the Israeli Supreme Court with his own appointees in the summer of 2023. There were massive street demonstrations against this, but other matters intervened. Trump has repeatedly threatened to expand the US Supreme Court with his handpicked stooges, and has otherwise interfered with judicial appointment on numerous occasions.

    It would however be naïve to believe that the judiciary in the UK (north and south of the border) are functionally independent of the Permanent State. They are an intrinsic part of the Permanent State.
    The Crown Agent overseeing the decision to prosecute Alex Salmond (David Harvie) has been identified as a “former” MI5 officer (they never really leave). The head of the Lockerbie Trial Briefing Unit, “Professor” Andrew Fulton was nothing of the sort, he was a senior MI6 officer.
    In the last few weeks Justice Jeremy Johnson has run a coach and horses through legal precedence in E & W. Charging a senior KC with contempt of court for merely explaining to the jury a principle of English law. Sentencing defendants for a crime they were not convicted of. Both of these acts are absolute legal firsts. Johnson would not be getting away with this without the backing of the Permanent State.
    On Friday the trial of Tony Greenstein ended with an acquittal. The judge Sarah Plaschkes issued the most outrageous vindictive, bile dripping statement to the press. She clearly wasn’t happy with the verdict of the jury.
    An accuser in the trial of Alex Salmond clearly committed perjury (I cannot say which one as they are protected by a life long anonymity order), yet nothing is done about this.

    There is no need to concoct a grand conspiracy theory about this. Individuals pander to the needs of the Permanent State because it leads to career advancement. The individual who issued the life long anonymity orders to Salmond’s accusers (Leeona Dorrian) has seen her career flourish.

    For Campbell to try and take Polis Scotland to court would be an exercise in futility. They will hide behind an impenetrable wall of constructive ambiguity. Polis Scotland and the COPFS will pass the parcel of responsibility between them ‘till the universe eventually succumbs to ultimate entropy. Polis Scotland will expend unlimited amounts of tax payers money defending their interests and Campbell will do likewise to any funds directed foolishly his way.

    Campbell would be best advised to highlight instances of injustice and leave it at that. That is after all what journalists are supposed to do.
    In recent months the Permanent State has reached with increasing regularity for press gaging orders. The Starmer arson attacks, the Covert Human Intelligence Sources (Criminal Conduct) Act, and criminal trials related to Palestine solidarity too many to mention. I will refer to these gagging orders as “D notices” as this was the term we used to know them by. I refuse to indulge the Permanent State in their perpetual game of whack-a-mole, where they change the name of these orders to try and obfuscate their existence.
    These “D notices” are effective in keeping MSM from educating the public. They are (not quite) so effective with the alternative media, which Campbell remains tenuously part of.

    ReplyDelete
  5. As far as Sturgeon is concerned it seems obvious she believes that misogyny should be a capital offence whereas misandry is a virtue.

    I got banned from another Scottish politics site for opining that Dugdale was possibly afflicted by penis envy - I won't make the same mistake again - Sturgeon worked it out by marrying one

    ReplyDelete
  6. "Don't waste your money on Wings, donate it a little read, lightweight and inconsequential blogger like me".

    ReplyDelete