The Express complain that no guidance has been given on how the word "garradh" should be pronounced, in spite of the fact that the majority of people in Scotland do not speak Gaelic. That, in fairness, is a very serious matter, given that technology allowing people to instantly look up the pronunciation of any word in any language on a conveniently portable handheld device is a pipedream that presumably remains several centuries away.
More puzzling, however, is the inclusion of the predominantly Germanic name "the Queensferry Bothy" in the Express' list of Gaelic interlopers, and that may explain why a sub-editor seemingly felt moved to insert the tortuous phrase "names inspired by Gaelic" as a get-out clause, although even that is something of a stretch. The word "queen" comes from the Old English "cwen", and "ferry" comes from the Old English "ferian". Meanwhile, "bothy" is a Scots language word dating from the 18th century, and although it will doubtless make the Express homicidal to be reminded of this, Scots is a Germanic sister language of English. It's true that the word may ultimately be a modified borrowing of the Gaelic "bothan" (although it may also come from Old Norse or simply from the English "booth"), but by the same token two-thirds of the words in the English language are borrowings from either French or Latin. Remind me to describe every Express article ever written as "inspired by French".
As usual, the Express try to justify their anti-Gaelic bigotry by noting that the language has continued to decline even as money has been spent on it, which makes no sense because the more logical conclusion to draw is that the investment has thus far been insufficient or that the language's predicament would have been even worse without it. Plenty enough money was spent by successive British governments on malicious attempts to eradicate Gaelic (not least by means of the education system), so it scarcely follows that money spent on reversing that process cannot be effective or legitimate.
The Express' logic might be sound in a fascistic sort of way if they were prepared to openly admit that they think the eradication of Gaelic would actually be a desirable outcome, but of course they aren't. They insteasd still pretend to care that some academics are arguing that Gaelic is on the brink of collapse (ie. within a few decades) as a native community language, and to merely think it's wrong that money is being spent on promoting "symbolic" use of Gaelic as a second language. That being the case, I really feel it's time to haul the Express editorial team before a Holyrood committee and ask them to confirm that they would enthusiastically get behind any diversion of funds into protecting the remaining fragile Gaelic-speaking communities and promoting the transmission of Gaelic as a first language within those communities.
It might rather fun watching them squirm on that point.
* * *
My seven-day promotional gimmick is over, but I still urgently need to make progress on making my content-creation financially sustainable. I currently have around twenty regular monthly supporters on my Ko-Fi page, so I basically need to roughly treble that, or to attract a very significant number of one-off donations. If you'd like to help me continue to create content by becoming a supporter, please check out my Ko-Fi page HERE - it accepts small recurring monthly payments or one-off donations of any amount, and it also accepts a variety of payment methods, including card and PayPal. A million thanks to everyone who has already contributed.
The obsession with Gaelic is what gives the lie to the SNP's civic nationalism. There is no reason apart from a form of ethnic nationalism which you condemn in all cases but this to make it an official language. One should support minority languages but proportionally. There are more people speaking Polish in Scotland but there is nowhere near the level of support for that language.
ReplyDelete"You are a bigot unless you wholeheartedly support my anti-Gaelic bigotry!" explains anonymous commenter on blog.
DeleteScots and Gaelic are two casualties of the phoney union imposed on the Scots.
DeleteIt’s poorly understood that Gaelic was at one time in the east of Scotland eg Fife.
Far too many wannabee English in Scotland. They are called Britnats.
The OP would prefer we all spoke with Received Pronunciation.
DeleteWell said
DeleteDeleted Anon: I have almost 2000 subscribers on YouTube and over 11,000 followers on Twitter, so "your inability to get subscribers" would not appear to be the most promising line of attack. I strongly suspect you are the same person who, when pre-moderation was switched on, repeatedly tried to leave comments reading epic significance into the supposed "lack of comments", which has also been made to look faintly ridiculous by the immediate explosion of comments as soon as pre-moderation was switched off. You were also apparently unaware that the YouTube videos have regularly been receiving dozens or even hundreds of comments all along.
DeleteKindly go away. You are literally one of only about six people who make pre-moderation inevitable and spoil things for everyone else (the fantasist Reform supporter with his nutty beliefs about me being a gay autistic ADHD tax-dodger is another).
James Kelly, why did you delete that comment? I read it and replied 'well said'. Now I can't reread to try and understand the argument.
DeletePity
Gaelic is not the major marker of Scottish identity. Scottish identity is strong institutionally
ReplyDeleteHoots Mon !
DeleteMore drip fed anti Scottish bile from our obscenely unionist biased MSM piped in from south of the border.Make no mistake... they want to dismantle Scotland, her heritage and institutions.
ReplyDelete