Monday, July 27, 2026

John Swinney's strong denunciation of Burnham's outrageous "off-limits" comment: my reaction


An audio podcast version of the above video can be heard HERE, and will soon be available on Apple Podcasts HERE.

I'm delighted to say I now have fourteen regular monthly Ko-Fi supporters, as a result of three more people joining over the last 24 hours.  I reckon if I could get up to several dozen monthly supporters that would make it sustainable for me to keep making content.  If you'd like to help inch me closer to that target, please visit my Ko-Fi page HERE.  Remember that if a recurring monthly donation isn't suitable, the page also accepts one-off donations of any amount.

22 comments:

  1. The English government would say NO even if God came back to earth and told them different
    Scotland is their property and on pain of death will remain so unless we the people take our country back the hard way
    There's no political solution to dictatorship

    ReplyDelete
  2. Presuming this is about this:

    https://www.snp.org/there-is-a-better-future-for-scotland-away-from-westminster-control

    I think it's good, though some may accuse him of just trying to please the Indy movement. I think we need to remember that as FM he is FM of the whole of Scotland including those for whom devolution is (currently) good enough. But as leader of the SNP he can be himself, and push for Indy for all he's worth.

    As long as it's not actually the other way around :-)

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. "Presuming this is about this:"

      There's a cunningly-disguised "play" button on the video which would tell you what it's about.

      Delete
  3. Early morning publishing of weekly YouGov, Westminster voting intention poll. Field work 26 -27 July, population sample 2,328.
    Headline; tie between Lab and RefUK.
    Lab 22% (+1), Con 21% (-1), RefUK 22% (-1), LibDem 11% (-3), Green 13% (n/c).

    Scottish sub-sample (203).
    Con 19%, Lab 21%, LibDem 11%, SNP 28%, RefUK 15%, Green 11%.

    Electoral Calculus model with Scottish finesse.
    Labour 125 short of majority.
    Lab 201, Con 155, RefUK 144, LibDem 64, Green 33, SNP 28, Plaid 3, others 4.

    Labour are strong only in the Liverpool Manchester corridor, and Tyne and Wear. Even the London boroughs are substantially Green. They have two nailed on seats in Scotland and the rest are marginal calls.
    The Short money from 28 seats ain’t gonna return the SNP finances to rude health (and that seems to be the only thing approximating a strategy at Jackson’s Entry).

    ReplyDelete
  4. A de facto referendum where parties stand as they normally do is unlikely to give us 50% if you just add SNP + Green votes. There's a whole bunch of pro-indy Labour voters who will never consider voting for anyone else, and you really need them on board. And maybe more (including indy-minded Reform voters). For de facto to work, the pro-indy parties would need to come together as a YES choice on the ballot. I doubt that could happen. But surely you'd need something like that to build the momentum, and promote the kind of spirit we had in the summer of 2014.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Well said, but there is an element in the SNP and the Greens that do not see Indy as a priority. Toilets, gender and all the divisive crap that goes with it have put Indy far down the list of priorities and in the interim the S G is becoming more incompetent with each passing year. Sturgeon did so much damage and has now walked off with lots of money and pension rights and leaves us all fucked. Murrel toook the hit but Sturgeon’s protestations of ignorance are as laughable as they are insulting. SNP reputation is severely damaged. Never forgive her. A million list votes lost. Stay in London with your unionist mates.

      Delete
    2. 12.22 So you are voting reform Uk then? Were you the one at the front on Saturday’s racist mini riot with yer gers tap oan?

      Delete
  5. Swinney is doing nothing. One of his ministers has been caught out playing politics with the dreadful fire in Cairngorm. SNP need a clear out if they want the million lost voters back.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Ach there's always the Alliance for Liberating Scotland,!

      Delete
    2. What utter tripe!....If anyone's been caught out attempting to play politics re the Cairngorms fire it was the uk gov wanting to be seen as the cavalry riding to the rescue with their military tonka truks. Big John was bang-on telling them to GTF!

      Delete
    3. 11:43 #Unionist Alert#Unionist Alert#Unionist Alert#

      Delete
    4. I spot the Daily Mail reader who has a gite in France

      Delete
    5. Thank you for that United British press release. Highly credible.

      Delete
    6. The SNP are just politicians, what do you expect them to do when England is a dictatorship?
      This is the people's fight

      Delete
    7. 12.57pm says Big John. What a joke. Swinney is not big on action for Scottish independence.

      Delete
    8. John Swinney left his sword at home, and the other SNP MSPs didn't know they were signing up to do or die
      These Daily Mail British yawns are so boring pretending to be independence supporters

      Delete
    9. Anon@7.16pm. The point is they should be independence leaders and not your bog standard useless politicians.

      Also they PRETEND to be independence leaders and that makes them grifters.

      Delete
  6. Westminster voting intention, hauf pint poll fae Survation (second in substantially less than a week).
    Field work 25 - 27 July, population sample 1,012.
    Headline; Labour 2% lead (+3)
    Lab 26% (+1), Con 21% (+2), RefUK 24% (-2), LibDem 10% (n/c), Green 10% (+2).
    There have now been 7 polls with field work exclusively conducted since Burnham was sworn in as PM. The poll of polls has RefUK ahead by 0.17%. This is not reflected on best fit curve graph on Wiki page, Westminster voting Intention.

    ReplyDelete
  7. Rob here,

    What John Swinney says hardly matters if it's with neither background nor prospect of anything being done. He's not Action Man, is he?

    Will GERS be debunked next time around, I hardly think it. Will the utter farce of electricity charging and connection charges be addressed? I don't think we need the whole manifesto just yet, but the SNP does need to start making a spectacle of Unionism's flaws. The SNP should be at least trying to make Unionism uncomfortable.

    ReplyDelete
  8. Thanks for mentioning disruptive tactics at WM James. I really feel that we have to make governing more difficult for them.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Aye it wasn’t so long ago that Pete Wishart wanted to be speaker of the house. Making life more difficult for unionists. Aye right.

      Delete
  9. Well said WT.
    Why do so many still bang on about John Swinney's strategy ? Beyond hand wringing and polite requests for 'more gruel' he hasn't got one. It is beyond the ken of the troughers he leads to understand/accept that we need a different road that will leave him irrelevant on the edges as Parnell was in Ireland.
    No more chasing fantasies, a majority and a disengagement strategy then Mr. Swinney can join Sturgeon in London with fat pensions, TV appearences and 'knowing nothing' about squalid little tricks in the past.

    ReplyDelete