My question, though, is who did Offord actually intend to impress by mentioning his boats and cars in his pre-scripted question to Ross Greer? All the evidence is that Reform primarily takes its votes from the lower end of the income scale, because that's where the anti-immigrant messaging seems to have most potency. But the only country I know of in which low-income voters are impressed by their leaders openly working in favour of the wealthy is the US, where people have bought into the myth of the 'American Dream' and honestly believe that tax cuts for millionaires can direct benefit themselves because they too will soon be millionaires if they just work hard enough. To the best of my knowledge, there is no similar phenomenon in Scotland. People in deprived parts of the East End of Glasgow or wherever are more likely to hear Offord's boasts, and his claims to be worried about losing young Scots to Dubai (!), and think "this guy is from another planet, he doesn't understand us, he can't speak for us".
There might be some logic to the idea that Offord is trying to expand Reform's support base by appealing to wealthy voters too, and it's true that fascist movements have in the past taken power with a coalition of support that combines both big business and the working-class. But in this case I'm not sure how Offord can appeal to Thatcherites without simultaneously alienating the low-income voters he needs to hang on to. If there is a way of pulling the trick off, I doubt if he's going the right way about it.
* * *
My latest constituency profile for The National is Rutherglen & Cambuslang.
* * *
If you're finding the new Scot Goes Pop poll useful, please check out our new polling fundraiser, and if you're able to chuck in a few pounds it would be much appreciated - it might help us to run another poll in the future.
Avarice is a sin and Offord, Ruth Davidson, Boris Johnson, Mcmoan says it all.
ReplyDelete"But the only country I know of in which low-income voters are impressed by their leaders openly working in favour of the wealthy is the US": what about Italy? See electoral success of Silvio Berlusconi.
ReplyDeleteI said on some other platform but I’m going to say here cos I’m quite product of it! Marie Antoinette said “let them eat cake”; Edwina Currie said “get on your bike”; Malcolm Offord said “I have six houses, six boats and five cars”. Each time, it was a comment meant to inspire the poor, the working calls, the ordinary people. What on earth goes on the tiny little minds of the rich?
ReplyDeleteAh, multiple properties - he must be pitching for the trades union vote.
ReplyDelete;)
Probably those who are economically centrist/right.
ReplyDeleteSo any new opinion polls James - I dont buy any UK Chanty Papers and i dont watch nay UK Propaganda mouthpieces.
ReplyDeleteTechnically speaking, Corsica is not an island.
ReplyDeleteBetween Andrew Six Chips Bowie and Malky Six Boats Offord, the number 6 seems to be a favourite of the new faux Tory crowd. Why not 7?
ReplyDelete"Which group of voters did Offord actually intend to impress with his boast about owning six boats"?
ReplyDeleteI think it feeds into the Reform UK election material sent out to voters in Scotland, where they stated that "plain old Malcolm from Greenock" is standing as a candidate in the Scottish elections.
Which then connects to the the same aspirational S*** that we once heard from Thatcher.
Problem is that Offord did not actually give up his title , as Life Peers cannot do this, all he actually gave up was him sitting and voting in the HOL's, which he only did because a sitting Peer cannot stand as a candidate for the Scottish parliament. He hold his title, Baron, for life.
So more of a convenience, as in a necessity, than a desire to revert to not so "plain old Malcolm" , the same "plain old Malcolm" that has six houses , six boats and five cars !
I'm not sure what the strategy was in Offord revealing this information but as far as supposed attainment aspirations it kind of sucked, as he also said that he had to go to London to seek his fortune (while being £2000 in debt) ....that was pre devolution, as Scotland was controlled, that is governed , only by a UK government, where we were the forgotten (neglected) country , as all opportunities were only found in London.
Not exactly a selling point for the UK State but a brilliant example of why we would be better off as an independent country.