Sunday, November 9, 2025

Are Labour quite sure there are no downsides to going all in on being the party of radiation?


 

16 comments:

  1. Keir Starmer’s Labour are marionettes to the Permanent State. The only question is which branch has the upper hand at any given point. Sensible, old, one nation Tory, Peter Oborne said Starmer was MI5’s man. Given that Starmer’s Chief of Staff at the time, Sue Gray spent the 1980’s pulling pints in the Cove Bar, Newry, Co. Armagh. That was an informed shout. Gray has since been replaced by Morgan McSweeney (the party apparatchik with the £700k holiday home). McSweeney’s contacts are more TransAtlantic (and Israeli) in nature. Perhaps MI6 now call the shots.
    Curiously, the Permanent State has no interest in the current trajectory (annihilation) of the Labour Party. Starmer and company will be rewarded with seats in the HoL, transnational institutions, etcetera. One hundred years of the Labour Party being the second party of British politics, will be consigned to the dustbin of history.

    ReplyDelete
  2. Did Kier Starmer take on the McDonalds corporation for free on behalf of Mosad?

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. That’s the thing that bugs me about Starmer. He wasn't always a total s***e working for the forces of unadulterated evil. He was no Tony B****. Something, or rather someone, turned him. And now it's all this.

      Delete
  3. Labour have promised to cover Scotland in mini nuclear reactors if they are in power in Holyrood. If I actually thought Labour had a chance of being in power at Holyrood I would change my mind and vote SNP next year. We do not need these reactors in Scotland in order to deliver even more energy to England while we have the risk of all the radiation.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. For goodness sake change your mind.
      For independence vote SNP, the only show in town.

      Delete
  4. So you are voting Reform.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. If you had half a brain it'd be lonely.

      Delete
  5. Re Remembrance Sunday used to be what it says. Now it seems to have been taken over by a group of zealots who insist you must wear a poppy, you must do this or that.My grandparents never wore a poppy because they saw (rightly or wrongly) Earl Haig as a war monger. I see on the bbc Scotland page a 27 year old wearing his ancestors campaign medals. I had to wonder why he hadn’t joined the forces himself. Looking at my own family I believe that ww2 was a (just war) but WW1 , Boer War, India campaigns etcetera etcetera is nothing to be proud off. Slaughter of innocents from all countries. Still I think of one uncle who was a PoW, my own dad and his brothers who fought and one was injured - not KIA thankfully. He Never wanted to be in the legion nor parade up and down. As was his right. Still he would be called a traitor these days and a threat as a SNP member while the red white and blue flag waving others call themselves patriots and hero’s.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Empires need wars to keep running. That’s what it was all about, back when the sun never set on the butcher's apron.

      War is peace. Empire is democracy. Colonisation is freedom. #BetterTogether

      Delete
  6. The SNP have an MoU with Believe in Scotland it seems. And that could have been good news, along with a BiS crowdfunder. Yippee, we're on our way at last, 2026 will be all about Independence !!! Yay !!! Yuss !!! Go for it !!!

    But wait, hark the National sings, story from the errr, something GMK:

    https://archive.is/h17Zn

    "Believe in Scotland say 2029 General Election can be 'day UK ends'"

    Oh right, yet another unbelievable can-kicking down the road to nowhere.

    "MacIntyre-Kemp said he no longer believed Holyrood 2026 would provide the route to independence because the “SNP are not ready”."

    Well guess what. No money from me, and no votes either. I'm not ready to waste either of them.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. @YI2. Stu's article on (Make) Believe in Scotland's plan for Indy reads refreshingly fair to me. MacIntyre-Kemp has already surrendered any chance of progress next year, and is talking up his talking shops. Spiffing! Surely more pleas from the same folk who have been pleading (for London's grace and Yessers' money) will have DECISIVE CONSEQUENCES this time around. Surely! Democratic legitimacy is at stake!

      No, please, where are you going with the microphones? We haven't finished yet…

      Jingle jangle. Spare a bob for Mike Russell's Indy horsebox? It just needs a lick of paint. On to victory!

      Delete
    2. Ouch! I could almost have written that article. Oh well, nevermind, there's always 2029, 2031, 2134, 2236 ...

      It's like Dynasty all over again! Which I didn't watch either.

      Delete
  7. Honest question, because I don’t know who's reporting on this or feeding the AI. Who else is the nuclear industry most actively lobbying, given Starmer's so far beyond his half-life now? Can Sir Nigel be relied upon for BNFL and the AWE's super-critical needs?

    Nuclear waste isn't just for Christmas. It's for longer than the total history so far of mankind.

    ReplyDelete
  8. Independence for ScotlandNovember 9, 2025 at 7:39 PM

    Which is a better plan?

    1. Mike Russell’s 11 point plan.

    2. John Swinney’s SNP majority at 2026 and secret action thereafter.

    3. Believe in Scotland Plan.

    4. None of the above.

    ReplyDelete
  9. Ifs is a tosser is missing.

    ReplyDelete