Tuesday, December 13, 2022

The media have been fibbing to us again over the last 24 hours: in fact, the YouGov poll does NOT show the public oppose a de facto referendum - it was instead a ridiculous question about Rhodesian-style UDI

On the previous thread, a commenter said that every time he'd heard a media outlet mention the new YouGov poll today, they had been at pains to downplay the headline result on independence (showing a 53% Yes vote) and had instead tried to divert our focus towards the alleged finding that the Scottish public "oppose" the de facto referendum plan.  But as far as I can see, no such finding exists.  There doesn't seem to be any sign of the YouGov data tables yet, but the What Scotland Thinks website does have an extensive list of results from the poll, and the only one that relates to a de facto referendum is in response to a question worded as follows:

"Would you support or oppose the Scottish Government declaring Scotland independent without a referendum if the SNP – and other parties supporting Independence – gain more than 50% of the vote at the next General Election?"

That's a question about Rhodesian-style UDI, not about the principle of a de facto referendum.  There is not even a shred of a suggestion from the SNP that they would declare independence unilaterally if they won 50%+ of the popular vote in a de facto referendum - instead they would use the mandate as leverage to pressurise the UK government into negotiating an agreed independence settlement.  (Some cynics think they wouldn't even go that far, and instead would revert to the broken record of begging for a Section 30 order that everyone knows will never be granted.)

It's difficult not to reach the conclusion that either YouGov or their client (more likely the latter in this case) deliberately asked a leading question about UDI to obtain a negative result, and did so with the full intention of misrepresenting that negative result as being about the principle of using an election as a de facto referendum.  It really is a pretty brazen stunt, even by the normal standards of the Brit Nat propagandists in the media.

What they're rather less keen to mention is that the poll shows that a clear majority (51% to 38%) want an indyref within the next five years, and that an almost identical majority (51% to 39%) think the Scottish Parliament should have the power to call an indyref without the consent of Westminster.

I also see from the What Scotland Thinks site that there are Holyrood voting intention numbers in the YouGov poll, which are markedly better for the SNP than the Westminster numbers -

Scottish Parliament constituency ballot:

SNP 50% (+1)
Labour 25% (-1)
Conservatives 13% (-)
Liberal Democrats 7% (-1)

Scottish Parliament regional list ballot:

SNP 40% (+2)
Labour 24% (-)
Conservatives 13% (-1)
Greens 11% (-1)
Liberal Democrats 6% (-2)

Seats projection: SNP 67 (+3), Labour 31 (+9), Conservatives 15 (-16), Greens 11 (+3), Liberal Democrats 5 (+1)

SNP OVERALL MAJORITY OF 5 SEATS

So a clear majority for pro-indy parties on the popular vote for the list ballot, and probably on the constituency ballot too once we discover the breakdown for "other parties".  It looks like Labour's surge may have stalled before they even came close to seriously threatening the SNP in the Holyrood arena. Incidentally, there's 8% support for "other parties" on the Westminster ballot, so it's possible that pro-indy parties are closer to 50% for a Westminster plebiscite election than we initially assumed.  In theory they could even be on 51% if the Greens have all 8% for the "others", but obviously that's very unlikely.

I hear on the grapevine that Panelbase currently have a Scottish poll in the field, so as long as it's not a private poll (always a real possibility) we may have at least one more independence poll before the end of the year.  That keeps open the scenario that the average Yes vote in this calendar year may yet exceed 50%.  The poll apparently has a lot of questions about the trans issue and about Alba, and yet I'm told Alba are not offered as an option on the main voting intention questions.  If I was going to hazard a guess, I would say that this is perhaps a multi-client survey with the questions about gender and Alba coming from Stuart Campbell and/or Alba itself, and with the voting intention questions coming from another client, possibly the Sunday Times.

*  *  *

If you'd like to help Scot Goes Pop continue, donations are welcome HERE.

16 comments:

  1. Aye the Brits have never played fair. It's a colonial standard behaviour. If you believe yourself to be in a master slave relationship you feel no need to play fair and the English believe they own Scotland and all who live here. A depressing reality but it's naive to hope for anything better.

    ReplyDelete
  2. Westminster voting intention (field work 2nd - 5th Dec) Savanta, multi-regression post stratification methodology. Baseline 2019 GE.
    SNP 55 out of 59 seats (+7)
    Tories wiped out North of Lincolnshire!!!

    ReplyDelete
  3. The client Times journalist Kenny Farquarson is so hilariously predicatable. He spends much of his tweets telling everyone Scots just really, really want more devolution. As soon as five polls come out saying they want independence he goes into full "tweet your tea" mode. Every bloody time haha. If there's anything to jump on that's anti SNP, any nuance to be taken he'll be back down from the hills giving us all a hot take. Guy still thinks the political landscape is in the 90s where we're all deep down still Labour. The Times needs a change of scenery to reflect Scots of today.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Not for nothing is Kenny "Devo or Death" Farquharson known as "Jurassic Farq".

      Delete
    2. So true. He probably had a point about 10 years ago, not now. He seriously underplays the shift from Labour to SNP and the solid changes that have occurred. The flawed and untypically emotional (paraphrased) "i'll be helping to get Tories out while you flag wave" gurn recently really gave the game away. Getting a wee bit rattled. fully expect more tea tweeting before the end of the year unless the next poll stops the run.

      it doesn't so much bother me as I find it quite amusing.

      Delete
    3. "i'll be helping to get Tories out while you flag wave"

      To which the obvious reply is: "if you want the Tories out, why did you vote No in 2014?" Basically an entire extra decade of Tory rule (at least) through his own handiwork.

      Delete
    4. Pre-2014 print journalists seemed to have more of an influence but this time around they're just another voice in the wind. It would annoy me a little then but it doesn't seem as important now. Obviously they have some clout but it's not what it was, I feel.
      I'm not sure it's entirely a good thing either. Wider negatives to it but definitely blunts a unionist arm they once had.

      Delete
  4. Just how can anyone promote the supposed UK GE de facto referendum when it is still to be agreed how it is going to work at some SNP conference at an unknown date next year. Indeed the only comments emanating from SNP politicians at present seem to be undermining whether it is actually going to happen at all.

    ReplyDelete
  5. Tories on 13%. That made my day !

    ReplyDelete
  6. The skeptic in me just can't help but feel that the SNP are going to find a way out of this.

    ReplyDelete
  7. James. What's your opinion on Flynn's latest statement about trying to amend the Scotland Bill? Even though I hate him shying away from the pleb. I do like this strategy (although admittedly it should have happened a lot a lot sooner). Rather than asking for S30 100 times. It's better to ask for that. Get blocked. Go to court. Get blocked. Try and changes Scotland Act. Maybe get blocked. Try 2-5 more things that get blocked.

    It's not to 'mount up pressure' it's to piss people off more and make them more YES. I think this strategy will work and let's try a couple more things, quickly, before we start ramping up for the GE.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. I don't mind him doing that, as long as it's in addition to the plebiscite plan, not instead of it. You'll appreciate why his recent comments to the Herald make me somewhat suspicious.

      Delete
  8. Off topic perhaps, sorry, but I noticed Radio Scotland didn't carry PM's Questions live at lunchtime today. The political corespondent spoke about it later, but the new SNP leader didn't get the coverage Mr Blackford enjoyed. Was he any good? Did we learn anything?

    ReplyDelete
  9. The fake "Reverend" will be devastated by this long run of good polls for Yes.

    ReplyDelete
  10. Latest poll from @ScotVoting

    Independence: Yes 50.2% No 49.8%.

    Net rating for Governments:

    🏴󠁧󠁢󠁳󠁣󠁴󠁿 +3%
    🇬🇧 -71%

    ReplyDelete