Saturday, June 6, 2026

Dark times for Stew as the full realisation dawns of just how *much* he's accidentally helped the SNP - so should the rest of us ease his pain by saying "thank you" with a Stew Statue?

Please go gently with the controversial Somerset-based "Stew" blogger if you run into him, things seem to have really got on top of him over the last 36 hours and he's now rather overcome with emotion.  If he calls you a **** (again), don't take it too much to heart, it's just the hurt and the distress speaking.  

It all started yesterday afternoon when he announced on social media that he was going to break a "major story" on Wings at 6pm.  I actually took a look at the appointed hour, and I was naturally expecting something so earth-shattering that it would be on a par with Watergate, but instead it just turned out to be a preposterous letter Stew himself had written to the Chief Constable and the Crown Office demanding that a criminal investigation be launched into the SNP's use of the ring-fenced indyref funds.  He delusionally seemed to believe that would be more than enough to produce the desired effect.  But, alas, with timing worthy of Frank Spencer, Stew published the letter just minutes after the news broke that the police had already decided that no new investigation would take place following a similar complaint from Sean Clerkin.  So it was already obvious that Stew's own demands were going to receive short shrift.

Today, Stew tried to preempt the setback he knew was coming by switching to full-on damage limitation mode, but I haven't seen him jump the shark to quite the same extent since the celebrated day on which he attempted to talk his way out of the humiliation of Reform UK mocking him for his loopy claim that they would grant Scotland an independence referendum.  His tactic this time was to try to reframe failure as success by setting up a fatuous "heads I win, tails you lose" false choice: either a) the police and the Crown Office would give in to his demands (he already knew that wasn't a runner), or b) he would somehow have proof that Scotland is a "banana republic".  Hmmm.  I suspect there are a few possibilities in between those two extremes that Stew hasn't considered, but that less excitable souls may wish to.

Only a few hours later, Stew's mini-tragedy was already complete - he had received brusque rejection letters from both the police and the Crown Office, and it has to be said that the latter weren't bothering to even try to sound polite about the whole thing.  The dismissive tone was of the "go away you utterly ridiculous man" variety.

Stew has been prancing around over the last ten days as if a reluctant world has been left with no choice but to belatedly acknowledge his genius and as if he can consequently now expect to be on the shortlist for a Pulitzer or something.  But it's all a rather desperate performance, because deep down he knows perfectly well that the tide has come in on him and left him stranded.  It's quite true that he played a role in bringing Peter Murrell's criminal behaviour to light, but that wasn't his objective at all, and he would in fact have been utterly horrified if he'd known that all he was going to achieve was to *save* the SNP from a rogue employee who otherwise might well have gone on to embezzle yet more huge sums from them and could eventually have left them completely ruined financially. Stew didn't even *suspect* that the SNP were the victims of an ongoing major crime - his interest was instead in the theory that the SNP's own collective use of the indyref fund money for general expenses constituted some sort of criminal act.  That was the only court case he wanted, and his objective was to see the SNP destroyed by it.  He's comprehensively failed on both counts.  Stew and certain others were doubtless sincere in their belief that what occurred with the ringfenced fund falls under the scope of criminal law, but the brutal truth is that it wasn't for them to interpret the law - and those that do have that task have now reached a very clear decision.  The SNP are certainly going through a deeply uncomfortable period, but that's only temporary and they can now rebuild and look to a brighter future, thanks in part to Stew doing his "Accidental Clouseau" and unmasking the embezzler before irreparable damage was done.

Try as we might, it really is going to be hard to dislike Stew if he keeps on unintentionally helping us quite as spectacularly as this.   He may feel like a broken man tonight, but frankly I think the rest of us should be considering a whipround to fund some kind of statue.
*  *  *

11 comments:

  1. No-one in Kirkcudbright has ever been kidnapped.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. The unionist troll KC claims to be from that neck of the woods.

      Delete
    2. There's been at least one kidnap, then.

      Delete
  2. I still think Murrell may need medical assistance.

    ReplyDelete
  3. James, I think it would be really good if The National would contract you as a weekly columnist, if you fancied that. Personally I would prefer to read your work than, say, that of Pat Kane (too pretentious by far) or several others I won't name (no harm to them, I just amn't keen on their writing styles).

    ReplyDelete
  4. Aye...I'll consider a whipround.....a sound whipping of his round repugnant ass!
    Hell mend him.

    ReplyDelete
  5. I wouldn’t bother with a statue. Bath is near Bristol, and Bristolians don’t like statues.

    ReplyDelete
  6. I don't think much of wings - I don't read it, and I don't do social media so I don't get all the references when you mention 'Stew', but I still think saying a fund is Ring-fenced means that it should only be used for a specific purpose - in this case Indyref2, not doing up the office or paying off loans. I always thought that fraud was defined as obtaining money by deception and this looks very much like it to me.

    I know you think the SNP are our vehicle for independence but presently it looks a dud. After 12 years I am still waiting on them telling me how they are going to achieve it. If they don't know how to get independence they should say so not keep telling us they have secret plans etc. The missing money isn't the biggest scam, it's the electoral lies they keep spinning out. If, as it seems, a Section 30 is the only game they are prepared to play then we can forget it. They seem afraid to say 'defacto referendum' with regard to an election and the only reasons I can think of for that is 1, they don't really want one. 2 they're afraid of saying it in case they win and they haven't got a clue how to proceed. At that point, their game will be over. They'll have been found out.

    I've always said England is not going to let us go easily and that must be obvious even to Swinney by now, the future battle for Scotland gaining independence will require a much more radical leadership than Swinney can offer.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Hi there

      I totally agree. The big picture here is i and many others were done out here.

      We need to ensure the culture around this doesnt happen again. I doubt it was just Murrell

      Delete
    2. Ach, there's always the Alliance to Liberate Scotland.

      Delete