I thought I'd take a belated look at the new MRP seats projection from More In Common, which I believe was published yesterday or possibly the day before.
Seats projection (More In Common MRP poll, 13th-30th June 2025):
Reform UK 290
Labour 126
Conservatives 81
Liberal Democrats 73
SNP 42
Greens 7
Plaid Cymru 4
Unlike the recent YouGov MRP poll, the fieldwork for this one took place entirely after (and indeed well after) the Hamilton by-election on 5th June. So the evidence is becoming ever stronger that the Hamilton setback did the SNP no lasting harm at all, except for the obvious point that it reduced their number of seats in the current Scottish Parliament by one.
This is another MRP poll pointing to a hung parliament, but not one in which the SNP would hold the balance of power, because Reform and the Tories between them would have a very comfortable blocking majority preventing any centre-left government from being formed. (Although doubtless Stew would say that all the SNP have to do is offer Reform a deal on withdrawal from the European Convention on Human Rights and Farage will instantly cave in and give them an independence referendum.)
There are some strikingly sharp differences in the details of the More In Common and YouGov MRPs. YouGov had Reform winning three Scottish seats, all in the south and south-west of the country, but More In Common still have Reform on a big fat zero in Scotland. They're not even close in the southern seats - in Dumfries & Galloway, for example, they're on just 8% of the vote, and in Ayr, Carrick & Cumnock they're on just 14%. There's also the odd phenomenon of Labour being projected to gain a couple of seats even as they suffer crushing losses to the SNP elsewhere in Scotland. One of them is Dumfries & Galloway, and yes, that's not totally impossible - the southernmost seats have not been particularly fertile territory for the SNP in recent decades (with the obvious exception of 2015), so if the Tories collapse it might be Labour that's left to pick up the pieces. But the other projected Labour gain is Dundee Central, and that makes no sense whatsoever - something freakish must have happened in the sampling. I rarely make hard predictions, but I can say with confidence that if the SNP win 40+ seats at the next election, Dundee Central will be one of them.
On the other hand, More In Common show Na h-Eileanan an Iar as an SNP gain, even though many other MRP polls have had it as a Labour hold. In fact, Labour aren't even projected to be in second place in the seat - they're a distant third behind the SNP and Reform.
The Lib Dems are projected to hold all five of their Scottish seats, but the SNP are breathing down their necks in three of them - Caithness, Sutherland & Easter Ross (Lib Dem 30%, SNP 30%), Mid-Dunbartonshire (Lib Dem 35%, SNP 28%) and North-East Fife (Lib Dem 36%, SNP 29%).
The Tories would be reduced to just two Scottish seats, both in the Borders/south. The SNP are the main challengers in both, and are around 8 or 9 points behind.
* * *
The allegedly fake cleric in Somerset, who claims not to be stalking me, tweeted about me for the 7489th time this year earlier today, and it was a weird delayed reaction to something I said last week. All I had done was point out the indisputable fact that the SNP's relatively low Holyrood list vote in the polls is not a major problem for them if their lead in the constituencies holds up, but that if the SNP's lead on the constituency ballot is reduced to low single figures, the voting system will then start working in Labour's favour and the SNP may be reliant on list votes to remain the largest single party in the Scottish Parliament. I'm sorry, Stew, but that's just a statement of the bleedin' obvious, and facts are chiels that winna ding and all that. Look at the 2007 election result as a good example - the SNP were one point ahead on the constituency ballot, but took a hammering in constituency seats. In fact Labour took 37 of the 73 constituency seats, meaning they would have had a slim overall majority if the election had been conducted solely by first-past-the-post. But once the list seats were added, the SNP just barely came out on top, with 47 seats to Labour's 46. That was only possible because the SNP took 31% of the list vote. If they had fallen short of that, perhaps because a small percentage of voters had abandoned them on the list for so-called "tactical" reasons or for any other reasons, they would have ended up as only the second-largest party despite winning the popular vote on the constituency ballot, and it's entirely possible that Jack McConnell would have remained First Minister.
That's correct, isn't it, Stew? So what's your point?
* * *
The running total in the Scot Goes Pop 2025 fundraiser currently stands at £3000, meaning it is 44% of the way towards the target figure of £6800. If you'd like to help the blog keep going, donations by card are welcome HERE, or alternatively you can cut out fees altogether (depending on which option you select from the menu) by making a direct donation via PayPal. My PayPal email address is: jkellysta@yahoo.co.uk
It's the projected Dundee result that makes me take this poll with the proverbial pinch of salt.
ReplyDeleteAnother 33 careerist bluehairs who give not a single toss about independence is what we'll get if this poll were to become a reality. Forgive me if I don't punch the air with delight.
ReplyDeleteAnother anti-SNP post. The unionists are getting desperate.
Delete33 Wisharts.
DeleteRead it and weep IFS lol, the SNP are back baby.
ReplyDeleteSo back in WM is what the so called Indy Party gets excited about..
DeleteThe SNP never went away Declan, but they faltered badly and the standard of governance went from very good to poor, with a resultant and very noticeable deterioration in health and education provision and road and transport infrastructure, amongst others. It is not enough to still be doing better than the thieving incompetents in power in Westminster. Standards of service provision annd transport and infrastructure should have been at least maintained and ideally improved. They were not. They got worse. And while people sit on 14 month waiting lists for simple but very necessary surgical procedures, their quality of life and their productivity both greatly reduced, the top tier of SNP govt were preoccupied with toilets and devoting huge sums of money to a Commonwealth games that no sane government would touch with a barge pole. No doubt roads in and around commonwealth game venues will be magically brought up to first world standards. The rest of us? Forget it. If you are happy with this that’s your prerogative. I am not and I am waiting for the SNP to persuade me otherwise.
DeleteDeclan is not punching the air. Strange person.
DeleteDeclan is orgasmic and is unable to punch the air at same time. Swinney turns him on.
DeleteI live in Dundee & can’t see Lab even coming close in that seat.
ReplyDeleteWhat about, for a Tory hold, West Aberdeenshire and Kincardine? They remain very strong up there.
The dates of the field data are way too early to show any Sultana Party impact - if that’s still going ahead? If her party does limp onto the arena then that’s more bad news for Labour.
Good to see the SNP remaining by far the most popular party with Scottish Voters.
ReplyDeleteDespite all IFS efforts the SNP will win almost everything
ReplyDeleteDoes that include next years football World cup, Wimbledon and the Open golf next week?
DeletePresumably any hint of the SNP holding in any polls influences Kenny MacAskill and the 'batter the SNP' contingent in the alleged Yes movement to majorly up the demonisation of Nicola Sturgeon before her book comes out and to push the justice for Alex conspiracy court case as being, for some, the big priority.
DeleteI would imagine the aim to finish off the SNP has taken priority now and seems to cause a fair amount of hysteria in the anti-SNP contingent, so the SNP are going to be made, rightly or wrongly, to suffer the slings and arrows of those who feel they deserve it. If the Salmond court case goes ahead, win or no win, the non-independence public will respond negatively anyway to the SNP, the media will have a field day (which they're pretty much having already with their 'independence is dead' narratives) will be still be declared devils from hell and along with perceived poor governance performance, and the narrative that they are non-independence supporting Brit Nats and no good for Scotland, pick your choice from the most negative rhetoric - those determined to see them wiped out are bound to succeed.
Every time the polls appear to be holding for the SNP, the usual timeously choreographed wolf packs come out on manoeuvres.
Too many out there working against the SNP - deservedly or not - for them to achieve any effective wins in 2026.
12.37 ever thought that the blame lies with Sturgeon and her husband for trying to send Salmond to jail on made up allegations.
DeleteAnon at 5.21. You have not a shred of proof for that allegation. Away back to WOS, idiot.
DeleteIf you think about it - there's no logic behind the assumption that 'Sturgeon and her husband' would contemplate 'trying to send Salmond to jail'. They would not have derived any personal nor political or party reputational benefit from such a thing and the priority at the time was trying to deal with warnings about a potential incoming pandemic. It's ludicrous to suggest that particularly the cautious about everything Nicola Sturgeon and whatisname, would uncharacteristically choose to defy all the logic in Christendom and deliberately devote time and effort to wanting any alleged rumour, even if they had suspected it which it seems they didn't as they seemed as shocked as everybody else, that a (former) First Minister allegedly morphing into a Benny Hill type character even becoming public in any way was going to be of some kind of benefit to them, the party the Scottish government and it's global reputation. No logic is them setting about creating such a nightmare scenario.
Delete“If you think about it” clearly your thinking is full of misplaced assumptions and wrong timings.
DeleteOk Stu
Deletean ignorant reply from an ignorant poster at 9.40pm .
DeleteFrom the Herald: "Ian Blackford: ‘Politics ought to be about hope — the SNP must seize that’ "
ReplyDeleteor what he meant to say:
"Ian Blackford: ‘SNP Politics ought to be about Independence — the SNP must seize that’"
Support for Weedy Wimpy Whiny Wokist Anti Indy SNP is lagging way behind support for Scots Indy. Go Figure!
ReplyDeleteThe ISP is the solution!
DeleteThe Alba-WoS dross on here are getting more and more upset at the SNP revival since the GE.
ReplyDeleteExactly the same mindset as unionists.
Virtually impossible to tell them apart now.
Even a cursory glance over at Campbell's comment section confirms that fact.
Wings is basically a place for unionists to feel right at home.
A poster like 3.39 forgets that the vast majority of independence supporters are not party activists and have never heard of WOS.
DeleteSo is the SNP.
Delete