It's fair to say that an early general election would probably be in the overwhelming best interests of the SNP and the independence movement. The polls do not show the SNP on a stellar vote share, but that doesn't matter under first-past-the-post as long as you're in first place and each other party is far enough behind you, and that is exactly the scenario that has arisen. An early election would very likely see the SNP regain a majority, perhaps even a landslide majority, of Scottish seats at Westminster, and the 2024 election would be left looking like an unimportant aberration.
The snag is, of course, that an early election is extraordinarily unlikely. There's no incentive for Keir Starmer to call one, in fact there's every conceivable disincentive. And his hand can't be forced with a vote of no confidence, because he has an overwhelming majority of Commons seats (albeit won on only 34% of the popular vote). We quite rightly scoffed at the Trump allies in the US who apparently spent January and February fantasising about how they were going to contrive a way of bringing the Labour government down early.
Nevertheless, very strange things do happen sometimes - nobody imagined in the spring of 2017 that Theresa May was only a few weeks away from losing her parliamentary majority, because she didn't have to call an election for another three years. So just from a purely speculative point of view, I've been pondering whether there might be some sort of way an election could happen before, say, 2028 (and some would argue that even 2028 would count as "early").
I think almost certainly the key to it would be Keir Starmer's early departure as Labour leader. That would have two effects - first of all, it would give the green light to the London media to start chipping away at the new Prime Minister's legitimacy, ie. they'd say that he or she lacks any 'personal mandate'. Secondly, and far more importantly, it would open up the possibility of the Labour membership selecting a leader who a significant percentage of Labour MPs cannot live with.
Imagine, for example, that Jeremy Corbyn was currently Labour Prime Minister with 400 MPs. That would plainly not be a stable situation in which we could be sure that the parliament would survive its full term, because many, and perhaps most, of those 400 MPs would regard themselves as informally part of the opposition to the Corbyn government. Now, of course Starmer's replacement isn't going to be a Corbynite, the rules have been stitched up to ensure that can't happen.
But what if it was someone from the soft left? What if it was Angela Rayner, for example? Is it just conceivable that the Labour parliamentary party has moved so far to the right that there are several dozen MPs who wouldn't even be able to stomach someone like Rayner? There might also be a class element to it - there are a fair number of posh boy (and posh girl) Labour MPs who would cringe every time they hear their own Prime Minister speaking with that accent. Suppose the right-wingers organised and went all-out to bring down Prime Minister Rayner, and when they failed went for the Plan B of setting up a Change UK style organisation, but on a much bigger scale? That might just possibly be enough to bring down the government and trigger an early election. It's an extreme long shot, but not totally impossible.
As you might have seen, there's been a lot of chatter in the media in recent days about Rayner supposedly already being on manoeuvres, and one Labour source was quoted as saying the leadership battle would undoubtedly be a straight fight between Rayner and Wes Streeting. If that's true, punters at the betting exchanges don't seem to have twigged yet. Streeting is the weak favourite, but is only priced at 7.8, while Rayner is only priced at 8.8, implying a strong probability that the next leader will be someone else entirely. Rayner's odds have shortened since I last checked, but I still think she looks like value.
On balance I suspect labour MP’s won’t give up on Starmer until such times they are under threat directly I.e a normal GE isn’t far off. So Starmer will not risk with reform around.
ReplyDeleteIt was desperately unlucky for the SNP to be at their lowest ebb just as the last GE was called. A loss of £1 million of short money for five years will obviously hurt.
ReplyDeleteIt's been my thinking for a while that next years HR election might also be unfortunately timed as far as Yes is concerned. The SNP will win, I'm certain of that. But, this Reform surge is going to provide a noisy, spiteful unionist opposition to what might well be a rather flimsy pro indy majority, probably with another Green coalition.
Try as I might I just can't see this one man band Reform project sustaining itself until the next GE. It will eat itself much as ALBA has done. Reform have already alienated much of their grassroots by attempting to be more mainstream. It may be that Scotland bears the brunt of 'peak' Reform and their star will fade by 2028.
" It was desperately unlucky" - I have read some tripe from SNP apologists but that must be near the top of the list. It was nothing to do with luck. It was all down to SNP policies/incompetence and lack of the promised action on independence. Not to mention some money raised for a referendum mysteriously vanishing.
DeleteWas referring to the unfortunate timing, not the shit show which got them there. If Swinney's steady Eddie leadership had been in place six months earlier a good proportion of the half a million abstainers would likely have voted SNP.
DeleteIt wos N S wot dun it. IFS has proof. Unfortunately the police don’t. Strange that.
DeleteAnon at 3.58am. Sorry but you vastly overestimate the impact of Swinney. The SNP are still in the mid 30% in the polls. The SNP are only leading in polls for Holyrood due to Labour being so shit awful and Reform splitting the vote of the others. " A good portion" are not voting SNP due to broken promises on independence and see no change under Swinney. If anything it is worse with Swinney indicating nothing will happen until support reaches >70%. In effect that means nothing will happen under his leadership. That also means the SNP is now a party of devolution.
DeleteApart from that it was Swinney and Sturgeon who endorsed Yousaf as leader when the UK GE took place. The timing like the disastrous actions was all the making of Sturgeon and Swinney
Anon at 5.56am - your post is gibberish. You should have gone to bed.
IFS going back on his previous accusations against N S. Well well. No evidence.
DeleteAnon at 11.35am - this time it is gibberish combined with lies. You should have stayed in bed if that rubbish is the best you can post.
DeleteYou have a back catalogue of posts accusing N S. You’re not seriously going to pretend you didn’t post the accusations are you? And of course you have no evidence. My post is entirely accurate. Oh dear, you’ve been caught out fibbing again.
DeleteAnon at 6.02pm - you posted " IFS going back on his previous accusations against N S. " - that is a lie. I stand by my criticisms of Sturgeon the Betrayer, Swinney the Redactor and Yousaf the Brief. The only person lying is you anon.
DeleteThe Sage of Cumbernauld ( or is it Greenfaulds ) has spoken.
ReplyDeleteAh. A troll who has only ever been through on a train. Greenfaulds is part of Cumbernauld, not some sort of "sister town".
DeleteExcellent, well written analysis.
ReplyDeleteAs much as I’d love to see Rayner as prime minister, sacking Starmer’s miserable cabinet in a thoroughly deserved bloodbath, it’s just wishful thinking.
ReplyDeleteStarmer won’t quit, no matter how bad things get, as that’s his mission. The party hasn’t the spine to push him, either. He’s their pilot to a waiting crash site, hundreds upon hundreds of seats lost to Farage in summer 2029. Everyone and their dog knows it, but none can do a damn thing about it.
Still, I’d like to see Rayner try. A working class, northern, ginger lass who has the balls none of the cowardly, condescending, bitchy men have in her party? Yes!
I'd rather not have another moron as PM. Tbf, I can't think of any current contender that wouldn't deserve that label, or exhibiting unenlightened self-interest which is no better.
DeleteOne problem with Rayner as next Lab leader is that her seat is very vulnerable to Reform UK. If you want to assume that Lab members choose her anyway as their Leader before the next GE, then more £ per £ gambled on her would be won on the "Next PM" market (which she would surely be if before that election...) than the "Next Leader" one. Beyond the next GE she may not be a MP anymore and hence (if so) out of the running for that simple reason. But, who knows?
ReplyDeleteThat's a fair point. She's priced at 11 for next Prime Minister, I'm not sure if that's better or worse value.
DeleteIs Josh Taylor "scotch"?
ReplyDeleteIs Stew Campbell an Aberdeen fan?
ReplyDeleteAn Israeli missile kills nine out of the ten children of a paediatrician Gaza doctor. Endless barbarity from the UK supported Israeli government. Her husband and one child survived. Always remember that Starmer said at the beginning of this conflict that it was fine for Israel to deny the Palestinians of food, water and fuel.
ReplyDeleteAngela Raynor, Deputy Leader of U.K. Labour confirms today that the UK is a true ally of Israel. This also confirms Labour values include massacring defenceless children and starving a captive population of 2 million. What a disgusting party. What a disgusting UK.
DeleteDisgusting maybe. Though not as disgusting as the Hamas terrorists who started it all by murdering hundreds of innocent civilians.
DeleteAbsolutely, Israel hadn't been illegally and brutally occupying the Palestinian territories for 56 years prior to 7th October 2023. It was definitely Hamas who started it.
DeleteAnon at 9.57am and 9.42am says " Disgusting maybe" sounds like you want to condone the mass slaughter of a captive population by bombs, missiles, drones and starvation by a terrorist state.
DeleteAnon also says "recent events". What!!! Do you think they all lived in perfect harmony beforehand? Did you just wake up in October 23?
Israel has been killing and locking up Palestinians with no trial for many decades. Not to mention stealing their land and destroying their homes. Gaza is one big prison camp created by Israel and controlled by Israel.
IFS, no I’m not condoning what Israel’s doing, it’s terrible of course it is. However, you’re coming across as someone who is a Hamas sympathiser, by refusing to condemn these terrorists!
DeleteAnon at 10.36am so why did you say " Disgusting MAYBE"
DeleteA poor attempt to deflect from what I posted by saying I refuse to condemn Hamas terrorists. You just made that up. A complete lie.
Colonialism and apartheid is an evil the world can do without and Israel is such an entity. Do you agree?
9 or 59 Scottish MPs in an English Parliament with 550 English MPs is a farce.
ReplyDeleteIt's why Sinn Fein don't even turn up.
Maybe the fact England has ten times the population of Scotland has something to do with it.
DeleteHardly a farce!
Anon at 9.34 .. I think you've missed the point.
DeleteKC always misses the point. That's why he's KC.
DeleteO/T,
ReplyDeleteGreat to see Aberdeen win the cup yesterday. Nice to see a team other than the Old Firm win some silverware.
Kemi Badenoch, Tory Leader, demonstrating that the Westminster colonial mindset will never go away when she says:- " you look at what has happened with Chagos, 30 billion pound giveaway for territory that was already ours". The British Empire mindset.
ReplyDeleteAh, IFS you’re back,
DeleteAnd here was me thinking you’d finally seen sense, and given up on this independence nonsense!
IfS at 10.09 -- Spot on.
DeleteKC at 10.24am - not uncommon for you to get things wrong. Colonialism is an evil that the world, never mind Scotland, does not need. I suggest that you move away from the dark side and stop supporting evil.
DeleteIFS, and certainly not uncommon for you to get things wrong!
DeleteAnon at 11.26am - go on tell me.
DeleteFicken Scheisseland
Delete