In retrospect there can't be much doubt that when Jeremy Corbyn was at the height of his powers as Labour leader, when he had recently achieved a miracle result at the 2017 general election and looked impossible to dislodge, a number of right-wing figures within Labour got together privately and tried to work out how on earth they could turn the tide and get the party back under their control, and what they settled on was the construction of a largely fake 'anti-semitism crisis'. As Machiavellian strategies go, that one would have seemed particularly unpromising if it had been set out in advance, and it really is quite astonishing how comprehensively it worked. Doubtless there was the occasional example of genuine anti-semitism on the Corbynite left, as there is in all walks of life, but generally speaking what the supposed "crisis" was about was legitimate criticisms of the Israeli state being repackaged as "anti-semitism". Too many people who might reasonably have been expected to be sensible enough to see through the stunt proved all too credulous, probably due to their own underlying disdain for the Corbyn project. The momentum behind Corbyn, which briefly made him look like a Prime Minister in waiting, was put sharply into reverse, and once again he was back to being dismissed as an abnormal figure outside the bounds of political acceptability. The tactic undoubtedly contributed to the scale of his defeat in 2019, paving the way for his replacement by Starmer, who was emboldened enough to remove his predecessor from the party on bogus grounds of anti-semitism - an act of unprecedented cynicism and arrogance. And yet the political and commentator class continued acting as if nothing was amiss.
Having seemed for ages to get away with all of this Scot-free, it's hard to escape the supreme historical irony of the fact that Starmer and co were - unbeknown to them - concocting their "anti-semitism crisis" at a moment in time just before the State of Israel was about to commit the worst genocide of the 21st Century so far, thus unexpectedly putting Jeremy Corbyn very publicly on the right side of history as one of the minority of politicians who had consistently refused to accept Israel using accusations of anti-semitism as a shield to allow them to get on with oppressing a neighbouring people. By contrast, Corbyn's tormentors like Margaret Hodge and David Lammy were left as the ones being seen to have cosy selfies taken with genocidal war criminals like Isaac Herzog and Benjamin Netanyahu. The Labour leadership's initial reaction to this problem seemed to be to double down and join with Israel in accusing anyone trying to impede the genocide, or even to identify its existence, of anti-semitism. But can you really do that with the International Criminal Court, now that they have issued an arrest warrant for Netanyahu?
Israel itself is of course already trying to discredit the ICC as an anti-semitic institution, motivated by a wish to distract from sexual harassment accusations against their chief prosecutor. The incoming Trump administration will doubtless join in with this smokescreen, and will probably take far more sinister actions against the ICC and its staff too. But given that the UK is a party to the ICC and fully accepts its jurisdiction, how can Starmer go down that road himself? Indeed, how can he do anything other than denounce those who try to undermine the rule of international law? In spite of the way the Labour party has mutated in recent years, there are still enough internationalists within the PLP that it's hard to imagine them indefinitely tolerating a leader who favours Trump and a wanted war criminal over the international courts.
I said a couple of weeks ago that one of the silver linings of Trump's victory is that it might force European countries, however reluctantly, to move away from slavish loyalty to US leadership. The ICC ruling may mark a parting of the ways whereby European countries will be forced to make a straight choice between loyalty to the US and adherence to an international rules-based system, because the two concepts will henceforth be opposites and fundamentally inconsistent with each other.
Bit of a problem for Keir Starmer that a big part of the ICC's rationale for issuing the arrest warrant against Netanyahu is "knowingly depriving the civilian population in Gaza of objects indispensable to their survival", ie. exactly what Starmer said Israel had the right to do.
— James Kelly (@JamesKelly) November 21, 2024
Prosecco corks will be popping in the cosy warm apartments of Scotland's bourgeois left tonight. Meanwhile, without their winter fuel allowance many of our pensioners will leave the heating off and reach for another blanket while a ScotGov SPAD gives thanks for the timing of the ICC's big story.
ReplyDeleteOh come off it, that's pathetic.
DeleteHow many dead in Gaza? The people responsible at the top are untouchable?
DeleteMcBarry clearly as made up a name as your comment. You should be ashamed but that I suspect that isn’t possible. Unionists really are lovely people.
DeleteHer real name is Hilda Grimslitt
DeleteAnon 7:07,
DeleteWe are and there’s considerably more of us than you lot.
Anon at 7.11. Have another go at putting your words together. They do not say what you mean them to say but you are too thick to realise.
DeleteThat's public schools for you !
DeleteMcBarry is a Tory.
DeleteExcellent - needed to be said. Starmer has shown himself to be an unethical tool of the worst instincts of western parasite elites.
ReplyDeletewell said.
ReplyDeleteAs long as Mandelson and Labour Friends of Israel are pulling Starmer's strings, you will see no change from him, Lammy and the Cabinet on this - only obsfucation and double-speak.
ReplyDeletePigs will fly first.
Starmer got away with it because the news media joined in the attack too and refused. to honestly examine the facts.
ReplyDeleteTragic death of some backpackers given top spot on the good old BBC main news. Taking account of the wording in the warrant against Netanyahu, Starmer should be resigning but that’s not happening. Donor boat must not be rocked. Lovely jubbly money.
ReplyDeleteThe UK is the member of the ICC, which has 124 members, but policing is devolved to Scotland. It does need to be clarified if that includes any arrests under the warrant of the ICC.
ReplyDeletehttps://asp.icc-cpi.int/states-parties
Diplomatic immunity
DeleteOT "Stephen Flynn to no longer pursue dual mandate"
ReplyDeletehttps://archive.is/dQMK7
Good, and about time. But rather than leaving it at a straight "Hands up, I've got this one wrong and won't be pursuing a dual mandate." he then goes on to attempt to justify it:
"My aim to save the public purse from unnecessary strain by potentially overlapping the role of an MP and an MSP for a short period until the next General Election was genuine in its intent - but doing it for the right reasons doesn't change the fact that I got it wrong."
Why do politicians have to try to make themselves look good when they've been deservedly put on the naughty list?
Note by the way this doesn't mean he won't stand to be an MSP, just that he won't go for being both MSP and MP. And in fairness it is his right to decide he'd prefer to come home. Same as all of us who've worked elsewhere.
DeleteWhat do we think is his most likely course of action here? Quit as an MP at the start of the HR26 campaign? Stand as an MSP candidate with the written assurance he'll quit as MP on day 1 at HR? Or wait until nearer the time and then go back on his word?
DeleteBeing too harsh on Flynn here. He was doing what he was doing for the best of intentions.
DeleteNot harsh enough. He's tried to bury his embarrassing U turn as soon as a big story broke.
DeleteI think resign as MP within a few days of being elected as an MSP is fair enough. Why should an MP have to give up their job before trying to get another? Doesn't happen in normal life - people find their next job before resigning their current one. If they've got any sense!
DeleteYes, I agree that's the most realistic way for him to swap parliaments. It's up to Flynn himself of course, but I don't think it's a stretch to say he's quite enjoyed his time down there. He'll be missing the limelight for sure, what politician wouldn't?
DeleteSalary wise it would probably be a positive move for him. MSP basic is 20k less than MP but assuming he becomes FM or at least minister in a coalition (who knows?) he'd likely earn more than he is now.
Alternatively, he might just decide to stay where he is. Again, it's his choice, his life. If he ever leaves politics he won't be short of highly paid job offers.
Only by voting for the SNP can Scotland prosper.
ReplyDeleteOnly by voting for Scottish independence can Scotland prosper.
DeleteThere you go corrected that for you.
IFS,
DeleteHideous post.
Is 'hideous post' your new catchphrase?
DeleteWho do you think people should vote for to progress towards Independence?
DeleteGive us a break. The boat is built and will sail. The second one is on its way. We know the problems but Fergusons is still there employing workers. Even the contract ship in Turkey has met problems and that is a more simple design.
ReplyDelete£1/2 billion to be set aside by labour for 4 miles of railway to London to connect a new station. No high speed train for Wales or Scotland.
Usual unionist bollocks
DeleteNot a word on the ICC arrest warrants on Reporting Scotland or STV. It's the ferries again. We cannae have people realising that the UK ally Israel is governed by people wanted for war crimes and crimes against humanity. We also cannae have people thinking what Israel did is exactly what Starmer said was alright for Israel to do - namely cut off all food, water, fuel and medicines for 2 million people. What a nice English gentleman Starmer is!!!
ReplyDeleteIsrael should be expelled from the UN and UEFA and sanctions applied.
Scandal indeed.
DeleteThe BBC reported the arrest warrants for everyone - this site unaccountably does not mention the warrant for the Hamas military leader
DeleteAnon at 11.52am - fair comment. Happy to point out that Netanhayu and Gallant are in the same company as a dead Hamas Leader and Putin. Some people would say Netanhayu is actually worse than the others but they are all vicious killers. Surprising you didn't go on and point this out.
DeleteAmerica is off its fucking head!
ReplyDeleteπ¨πΊπΈ #BREAKING: SENATOR LINDSEY GRAHAM THREATENS COUNTRIES WHO COOPERATE WITH ICC ARREST WARRANT
“I will soon introduce legislation that will impose sanctions on any country that cooperates with the orders of the court in The Hague.
“I don't care if it's Canada, France, Germany or any other country. These arrest warrants are a threat to the US and not only to Israel. We are next in line. I am convinced that there will be a bipartisan majority for this law and that President Trump will sign it.”
It is only by voting SNP that a more prosperous Scotland can be brought about.
ReplyDeleteIt is only by voting for Scottish independence that Scotland can prosper.
DeleteThere you go corrected it again for you but I note you are a slow learner.
IFS,
DeleteAbsolute bullshit.
Anon at 1:13 PM
DeleteIt isn't bullshit for an Independence supporter who supports Independence and is only interested in a political party if they get us to Independence. Many people think the only way for Scotland to prosper is with Independence.
If the SNP abandon Indy they don't get my vote.
So yeah it is devolved, and as the National says:
ReplyDelete"As an aside, section 2.2 of the act exists because of Scotland's separate legal system, and says only that the request for arrest must be passed from UK ministers to Scottish ones, before being passed to a Scottish judge. "
https://web.archive.org/web/20241122124316/https://www.thenational.scot/news/24743844.proper-process-must-happen-netanyahu-arrest/
What isn't clear from that though, is if the request could be initiated by the Scottish Ministers without a request from the UK Gov. If any of the three just happened to turn up in Scotland of course.
This is interesting in a different way because I looked at it earlier and it didn't seem to be a direct equivalent, more perhaps about war crimes etc IN Scotand or for people becoming resident in Scotland.
ReplyDeletehttps://www.legislation.gov.uk/asp/2001/13/contents
Which is interesting, perhaps in a Megrahi and MacAskill 2009 way, where he was released under Scots law on compassionate grounds, despite massive attempted pressure by the US - MacAskill's finest hour some would say, backed up by Salmond of course.
If Scots Law is different, THEN USE IT.