Friday, March 1, 2024

Keir Starmer learns there *is* a price to pay for genocide-apologism: utter humiliation for Labour in Rochdale as they slip to FOURTH

In his now infamous dual letters to Muslim and non-Muslim voters, George Galloway said that victory for him in Rochdale could lead to Keir Starmer being displaced as Labour leader, and that it would "Make Rochdale Great Again".  I wouldn't have thought the second promise is any more likely to be kept than the first, but on the whole I'm glad that Galloway won, because it finally demonstrates that weaponising antisemitism against the Left is not a cost-free exercise forever, especially when it leads a Labour leader to tack so close to Israel that he even suggests that Netanyahu has the right to commit the genocidal act of cutting off food, water and electricity to the civilian population of Gaza.

Rochdale by-election result (29th February 2024):

Workers Party of Britain: 39.7% (n/a)
Independent - Tully: 21.3% (n/a)
Conservatives: 12.0% (-19.2)
Labour: 7.7% (-43.9)
Liberal Democrats: 7.0% (n/a)
Reform UK: 6.3% (-1.9)
Independent - W Howarth: 1.7% (n/a)
Independent - Coleman: 1.5% (n/a)
Greens: 1.4% (-0.7)
Independent - M Howarth: 0.8% (n/a)
Official Monster Raving Loony: 0.7% (n/a)

There's always a frisson of excitement when a new party wins a parliamentary seat for the first time, so I turned to Wikipedia in the hope of discovering what manner of party we were getting, but I ended up more confused than when I started.  The Workers' Party of Britain ideology is described as (among other things) "far-left" and "communist", which if taken literally would mean a communist party now has representation in the UK Parliament for the first time since Willie Gallacher lost his seat in 1950.  But curiously, Wikipedia's only source for this claim is a webpage in which communists denounce the Workers Party of Britain for "transforming itself into a left-social-democratic vehicle for bourgeois parliamentarism and anticommunism"!

52 comments:

  1. Unfortunately 'Gorgeous George' has gone full-on Neil Oliver. Horrible man.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. He is Britain’s finest Useful Idiot. Truly indefatigable, too.

      The right thing for Palestine would be to kick up a fuss in Westminster, which he will do (do take notes, SNP) while being crystal clear that Israel is his enemy, not Jews. Discipline, however, is not his forte.

      Keep a look out for wildly off-key nonsense like anti-immigrant, Faragist, even Trumpy stuff spilling into his speeches, along with a spike in web searches for the Bilderberg Group and The Illuminati. Oh, it all joins up, so it does. Like a zip behind your head.

      Delete
    2. Gaza is all the Protocols of the Elders of Zion’s fault, we can all agree.

      Delete
  2. It’s time to celebrate the greatest comment ever made on Scot Goes Pop:

    https://scotgoespop.blogspot.com/2024/02/the-contrast-between-labours-ongoing.html?showComment=1707753828289&m=1#c7062164724724563512

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Anonymous
      February 12, 2024 at 4:03 PM
      The Labour candidate has issued a very clear apology and this has drawn a line under the matter.

      Delete
  3. There were local factors in this by election which prevent strong conclusions from being drawn.

    ReplyDelete
  4. James has it right.

    At least as far back as the late 1970's Zionist factions within the Labour Party worked hard at denying that there was any distinction between opposing Israeli oppression of Palestinians and anti semitism. Many of us on the then Labour left fought that deliberate deception.

    What I don't understand, having had nothing to do with the Labour Party since the mid '80s, is how the latest push for witch hunting opposition to Zionist oppressions has been so successful as to take Labour fully into the ranks of the oppressors of the Palestinian people.

    Just in case anyone is in any doubt it is perfectly possible and correct to oppose both militarist Zionism and anti semitism !

    Seems to me it's one of the few important matters that the SNP leadership is getting broadly right at present.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. One word answer: Blair.

      The 1990s thoroughly transformed the Labour Party into the English equivalent of the US Democrats. Socialism replaced with neoliberalism. The whole raison d’Γͺtre of the party being “Better Tories than the Tories.” Enough election losses to a disintegrating yet still victorious Tory party ruined their moral compass. They got desperate, then cynical, then ultimately believed it.

      Corbyn scared the hell out of the professional party. Re-emergence of their original mission could not be tolerated. Never again! So they use every means they have to bash him and the left and so now it’s all this.

      The lower down you go in Labour, the better the people are. But the higher up, the more contorted and ultimately neoliberal they become, right up to Sir Keir himself. It’s like a window into the future of the SNP if they stay on this path away from Indy for much longer. Their soul is gone. Then the public begins to give them a kicking after kicking.

      Delete
    2. " The lower down you go in the SNP, the better the people are. But the higher up, the more contorted and ultimately neoliberal they become, right up to Humza Yousaf himself."

      Delete
  5. george going to shate all over starmer

    them both wrestle in it

    happy days

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Keep an eye on the polls. If this really affects things, we could see the impossible: the Tories winning yet again after all. What a nightmare for the union!

      Delete
    2. The nightmare at the GE will be for the Nats.

      Delete
    3. That all depends on Labour’s strength. A little glimpse of abject panic here.

      Delete
  6. The England version of George Galloway is a firebreathing left wing old school socialist, despised by those in power. How come we never get that version? Whenever he comes back to Scotland, he hangs around with his Tory/Spectator reading pals, and campaigns alongside them as a right wing yoon.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Because we are colonial property. Not real people, like the English. He always has his eyes towards the capital.

      Delete
    2. Well said Andrew , lets remember how Galloway campaigned with Labour and the Conservatives and Lib Dems against Scottish independence

      Terence Callachan Dundee

      Delete
  7. Workers Party of Britain appears indeed to be a Kautskyist social-democratic amalgam of Trotskyist ideas, most of which are anti-communist (in the sense of orthodox communism). And George seems to have more in common in his extreme views with Stuart Campbell (another of your favourites!), who also has gone rogue.
    You may rest easy, James, no comminist has been elected MP yet, we won't turn into the Soviet Union or East Germany!

    ReplyDelete
  8. I advise against extrapolation from this one observation.

    By-elections, ensconced as they are in the parochial vicissitudes of local politics, resist facile extrapolation to broader electoral trends.

    The idiosyncratic confluence of local issues, personalities, and contexts renders such contests a Sisyphean task for pundits gallantly seeking to divine wider political auguries from these insular electoral skirmishes.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Chat GPT says Keep Calm and Carry On.

      Galloway himself has a long record of being a one-man, traveling flash in the pan, yes. But Labour does have an Israel problem, this we can all see, as clear as the emperor's willy!

      Delete
  9. The wee fat twat in the hat who talks like a cat is back. The ultimate carpetbagger (allegedly - careful, this anti-establishnent rebel loves to do the rich people thing and sue through the establishment's courts) The working class Dundonian wi the plummy voice.

    Why would anyone vote for the befuddled auld joke? He's the world's first Irish nationalist British unionist. Simultaneously an Irish catholic Arab muslim (allegedly) More full of sh@t than the gutters where his politics come from.

    ReplyDelete
  10. Inaccurate because there are others who have put forward the case for Irish unification while holding out against Scottish independence.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Must be hard being so humourless and pedantic...

      Delete
    2. Anon at 11.23am - you are correct. There are people who attend Parkhead who are against the union in Ireland but for it in Scotland. There are also people who attend Parkhead who are for the union in Scotland and Ireland. Finally, there are people who attend Parkhead who are against the union in Scotland and Ireland. The same goes for Ibrox but in different proportions.

      Delete
  11. People realising that if you vote Tory or Labour you are aiding and abetting a Palestinian genocide. Sunak and Starmer swimming in the blood of women and children. Even the US sec of State for defence has stated that more than 25,000 women and children have been killed by the IDF - these soldiers are way worse than Butcher Cumberland's redcoats and they ain't finished yet not by a long way if they are not stopped. Murdering bastards.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Typical Nat nonsense. Trying to make political gain out of a tragedy in a foreign country. Shameful.

      Delete
    2. This diddy at 12.02pm is actually trying to suggest that I want people to vote SNP πŸ˜‚πŸ˜‚πŸ˜‚πŸ˜‚πŸ˜‚πŸ˜‚πŸ˜‚

      Delete
    3. Roll on Scottish independence i will payvthe fares for all those britnats who say they will leave , nobody will miss you and nobody will welcome you

      Delete
    4. Dear oh dear, more Nat nonsense.

      Delete
    5. You’re not much of a troll, are you mate? Give it some welly at least.

      Delete
  12. Another low by election turnout that could signify nothing by the time the general election comes
    Galloway made it religious that usually means a fight back from the other side when their time comes

    Tories and Labour know this, they've used it on Ireland and Scotland and every other country they invaded in the past, now somebody is using it on them

    ReplyDelete
  13. Galloway would defend or condemn sputum if he thought there was a vote in it
    He's just a wee Tory Labour unionist chancer in a bad hat

    ReplyDelete
  14. England's problems are Scotland's opportunities. Or at least they bloody well should be.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Ultimately, it’s about the Scottish people realising that England’s problems are not our own, and their desires are very different to ours, too. We’re not in it together. They don’t care about us. Let’s just finish this thing.

      Delete
  15. In the midst of Galloway's triumph in Rochdale, Scottish Westminster VI from Survation is out-

    SNP 38
    Lab 35
    Con 15
    LD 8

    Movement away from Labour (ie outwith MOE) since last Survation poll.

    ReplyDelete
  16. Sorry, I stand corrected, SNP 38, LAB 33.

    Apologies.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. So combined SNP, Labour and LD share 79%. That's before anti-Tory tactical voting is taken into account. As a lifelong Tory, this worries me greatly.

      Delete
    2. Another Lifelong ToryMarch 1, 2024 at 4:43 PM

      Agreed. There's no silver lining at all here. Baaaaaaad news for our party.

      Delete
    3. Ifs, stop talking bull.

      Delete
    4. Britnats will force up the price of handwash as they try to wash the blood of thousands of dead children off their hands to no avail.

      Delete
    5. It’s not bull’s blood, anon. It’s children’s on you.

      Delete
    6. It’s utterly pathetic the way Nats are trying to make political gain out of this tragedy. Just like Sturgeon did during Covid.
      There seems no limits to how low you’ll stoop.
      Disgusting.

      Delete
    7. " Tragedy" - the tragedy is people voting for political parties that facilitate a genocide - Sunak and Starmer. Now that is disgusting.

      Delete
    8. Ifs, more utter BS.

      Delete
    9. Britnat anon - more than 25,000 dead children - aided and abetted by Sunak (S) and Starmer (S) - the modern day SS. Leaders of the main English parties. Blood on their hands. Blood on your hands as you support them.

      Delete
    10. IFS, truly desperate Nat BS.

      Delete
  17. Perhaps because of the greed and selfishness in their black hearts and their general vileness as people ?

    ReplyDelete
  18. I cannot understand either how or why voters in England can fall for that opportunistic conman, George Galloway. When he was described by a BBC commentator this morning as 'hard left', I nearly choked on my cornflakes. When he was attempting to con Scottish voters in 2021 with his 'All for Unity' lot, he was in tow with some of the most far right wing individuals living in Scotland, sauntering around with his Union Jack appareil. He is the very worst type of politician, in my opinion.

    ReplyDelete
  19. So , whether you love him , hate him or are totally indifferent , Galloway wins a “ democratic “ bye election ( again) and is elected by the voters to represent them in the English Parliament. However , according to both Starmer and Sunak ( two cheeks of the same English establishment arse) , “ democracy is now under threat” . In other words the English establishment endorses democracy just as long as the winning candidate conforms to what & whom they require ( in their view) . Any maverick outsider wins and then “ democracy is under threat” . Pathetic

    ReplyDelete
  20. James it might be worth a visit to u tube and a video “ the real threat to democracy “ by Peter Osbourne . Very illuminating .

    ReplyDelete