An audio podcast version of the above video can be heard HERE, and will soon be available on Apple Podcasts HERE.
* * *
If you'd like to help Scot Goes Pop to continue, please check out my Ko-Fi page, where you can either set up a small recurring monthly donation, or make a one-off donation of any amount. Many thanks to everyone who has already contributed.
Robinson is just doing what the BBC allows him to do.
ReplyDeleteThe State broadcaster allows an extreme right Pro-Zionist Tory to spout the line that the overwhelmingly Pro-Zionist UK Govt and UK Media want him to spout.
They know that they have already lost most of the UK public on this (by all available polling) and are now frantically trying to ignore that fact and browbeat that same public into agreeing with their Pro-Zionist views.
But it isn't working and the more frantic they become, the more they will alienate the public.
Unsurprising to see Campbell yet again on the Zionist-Fascist side of the argument.
Him and his small cult of followers are now so far gone that they are simply not worth bothering about.
Trash
My old man recounts the summary execution of british soldiers, Arabs diplomat and peacekeepers by the Stern Gang / Irgun in the 40's. They were extreme right wingers and some became the leaders of the new state of Israel. It seems some of their progeny are still in charge and hold the same extremist views.
ReplyDeletePolanski will find himself increasingly shunned by the entryists in his own party. He'll be demonised and marginalised just like Kate Forbes was by the trans activists in the SNP.
ReplyDeleteIf the pro Palestinian cause is apparently so important to the UK public why do activists need to hijack a completely separate political movement to get their message across?
Labour will be so glad these tiresome bampots left when Corbyn got the boot.
Mr right wing religious bampot are we? Always got a interest in folks sexuality.
DeleteOk Keir
DeleteIn what sickening perverted world does being against an ongoing genocide in Gaza in which around 30,000 completely innocent children/babies have already been slaughtered, make you a "bampot'?
ReplyDeleteRobinson used deliberately doctored extracts from an interview with A S which completely changed its meaning. The BBC promoted it. That says all that needs to be said about Robinson and the BBC. In my opinion Robinson is a liar and an apologist for Genocide. The BBC are the same.
ReplyDeleteSpot on.
DeleteHe is a brazen two-faced liar.
i see plonker is back!
DeleteAnon at 4.07. It is a matter of public record. Look it up you cretin.
Delete5:43, you are a sad nationalist!
DeleteLol.
DeleteWho is this Yoon divot? 😂😂😂
Good to see Swinney praise Flynn who has been unfairly attacked:
ReplyDeletehttps://www.bbc.co.uk/news/articles/cq5yn75jr75ro
Absolute bollocks.
DeleteLol.
DeleteAnother Yoon pigshitter.
The wind’s always in the faces of nationalists.
ReplyDeleteexplains the contortions on the faces of the britnats.
DeletePolanski is coming round to accepting that the disastrous motion on Zionism was misguided, and accepts that he ought to have been vocal in his opposition to it passing unamended. His rejected amendment sought to minimise the damage to the reputation of the Greens that has followed. The usual halfwits on here have of course been waxing lyrical about the ridiculous definition of Zionism and the one state solution the Greens now support on paper. Hopefully he can get the adopted definition amended in due course. The halfwits referred to above needn’t bother commenting on this post. It is so far above your pay grade. Until the definition is amended the Greens are open to accusations of anti semitism. I think there is a real risk that the minute grouping of anti semites that previously attached themselves to Labour have jumped across to the Greens. The Greens have to be careful. The murderous genocidal State of Israel and the equally evil IDF should be the target of criticism and action. Student politics and anti semitism should form no part of the policies of the Greens. Ditch it and ditch the definition.
ReplyDeleteThe UK Green Party is not the first institution to recognise zionism as racism. In 1973, in Resolution 3151 G, the UNGA condemned what it called an “unholy alliance” between South African racism and zionism. Two years later, the World Conference of the International Women’s Year adopted a principle that “international co-operation and peace require…the elimination of colonialism and neo-colonialism, foreign occupation, zionism, apartheid, and racial discrimination in all its forms.” A month after that, the Organisation of African Unity, predecessor to the African Union, declared “that the racist regime in occupied Palestine and the racist regime in Zimbabwe and South Africa have a common imperialist origin, forming a whole and having the same racist structure.” The Non-Aligned Movement went further, condemning “zionism as a threat to world peace and security” and calling “upon all countries to oppose this racist and imperialist ideology.” We find all of the above in the preamble to Resolution 3379, adopted by the UNGA in 1975, which determined in a pointedly simple phrase, “that zionism is a form of racism and racial discrimination.” To the world’s majority, zionism has always been racist, sitting alongside the racist and apartheid structures of Rhodesia and South Africa.
DeleteDid you not read the amendment proposed by Polanski and his comments? And do you not realise that you quote authority that distinguishes between racism.and Zionism? And of course, you have a definition of Zionism that not everyone shares. As I said, the Greens need to ditch the student politics. The miniscule percentage of greens who have caused this damage have a lot to answer for but I suspect they do not care. They would rather sit on their very high horse (as they see it) than be involved in running a country.There is a real world out there. In that real world a two state solution needs to be found.
DeleteWhen you have a choice of Sudanese (the ones with the biggest genocides), Palestinians, Burmese, Congolese, Kashmiri, Ukrainians (the ones with the most dead?), Yemeni (dead heat with the Ukrainians?), etc, why do the Palestinians get chosen as imaginary pets and the others pretty much get totally ignored? Serious question - because that attitude is real and very prevalent.
ReplyDeleteOr the fastest, nearly a million Rwandan Tutsis murdered by Hutu extremists in 100 days in 1994.
DeleteThe good ould Northern Ireland tradition of whataboutery
Delete.
Why do some morons get very upset when the Gaza Genocide by the Fascist Racist Apartheid Zionist State of Israel gets 'more' coverage than other similar atrocities in the Western Press?
ReplyDeleteThe solution is not to question the coverage and human empathy given to the Palestians in Gaza, but to encourage and demand that those other atrocities get matching coverage in the Western Media.
It is a matter of inherent humanity to empathise with the victims of Genocide wherever it occurs and to try and criticise decent human beings for doing exactly that, rather than criticise and expose those responsible for such acts, is both reprehensible and beneath contempt.
You're very good at personal abuse and anger. Try calming down a bit. You'll get no sympathy for your cause if your opening gambit is hostility.
DeleteThose who attempt to pit one Genocide against another in relation to how much coverage and human empathy is given to each, deserve all the abuse they get.
DeleteThey are stinking human trash.
Well said. As for the anon at 7.50, it needs to get out more if it thinks you are being abusive.
Delete10.03
DeleteYoons are such precious wee snowflakes.
You have to be a complete and utter moron to call other people a complete and utter moron.
DeleteWasn't this posted in an earlier thread?
ReplyDeleteIt is a fake post trying to stir up ‘civil unrest’ in Scotland, mmm? Wonder which party could be behind that? All we need is 51% support for independence, that is called a majority and democracy!
ReplyDeleteYes 51% would obviously be a majority. It’s getting a referendum that’s the big problem though, and it’s very difficult to see a route to one anytime soon.
DeleteAnon@10:53pm, what post are you referring to regarding civil unrest?
Delete9.55 The post that I was referring to has been taken down! Don’t know why, probably because it was from reform trying to stir up trouble!
DeleteReform are scum. And I see Farage is calling Burnham a liar over his Russia allegations. Too close to home for Farage? Wouldn’t be surprised.
Delete1:16,
DeleteJames has a tendency to delete posts that he dosen’t agree with. It dosen’t do anything for keeping debate flowing, but it’s his site.
Good timing by the SNP as John Swinney is set to make a speech at the SNP conference next weekend. I was speaking to an SNP member who says he is scheduled to make a speech in which he presents a package of measures to deal with the various criticisms of government policy and to set out a clear path forward.
ReplyDeleteJohn Swinney is likely to focus on the domestic agenda, including building up policies to address cost of living.
DeleteThe person you were speaking to. Were his initials A I by any chance?
DeleteFor the millionth time, would people please stop swearing. Do not keep ignoring this request. Just completely desist from swearing. Thank you.
ReplyDeleteYet another attempt on WOS to flog the long dead horse of trying to prosecute N S. More whipped up outrage from the mouthfrothers and more money for Stuey boy. Kerrching. Why doesn't Stuey use some of the money to do a law degree. He certainly needs one. That would possibly stop him churning out his embarrassing ignorance soaked drivel.
ReplyDeleteYou posted that before you complete and utter moron.
DeleteA bit like beardy man from Bath
DeleteAnon at 2.51 pm ... calm down, dear.
DeleteAnon@ 2-51pm obviously one of the moronic mouth-frothers previously referenced.
DeleteYou have to be a moron to call other people moronic.
DeleteYou have to be a mouth-frother to call other people a mouth-frother.
Anon at 5.25. Stupidity on steroids. Clearly you are a moron and a mouth frother. How much have you given the Rev. Be honest. Why don’t I call you a genius. Get an adult to explain that to you.
DeleteAnon at 2.51. No I didn’t but hey, don’t let facts get in your way. And thanks for proving my point.
DeleteHaving allowed SPUC to have a fringe event ostensibly on forced abortion, which may have been a bit stupid but it IS actually still a valid concern even in 2026, they've now been incredibly stupid by cancelling it.
ReplyDeletePeople will have made plans, paid for adverts and leaflets, taken days off, booked travel and expensive accommodation - and will all genuinely need to be totally compensated. Tens of thousands of pounds. Not to mention the potentially discriminatory aspect of it.
Very unimpressive. THINK before acting.
Who allowed then cancelled?
DeleteThat's the SNP conference of course.
DeleteThank you for clarifying. And apologies for not realising the conference to which you were making reference.
DeleteYes, sorry, I must have posted that at exactly the same time as you posted!
Delete"Now, the SPUC chief executive John Deighan has written to First Minister John Swinney to demand he intervenes in the decision to “censor” the anti-abortion group."
Deletehttps://archive.is/79lnX
I agree. Women, including very young women, should neither be pressurised to have an abortion, nor not to have one. Their body is their own.
This is a very personal and sensitive issue. Can I suggest people hold off from commenting on it on this forum. There is no shortage of reform like lowlife on here happy to weaponise this matter.
DeletePeople should not close debate.
DeleteGood idea, better get back to the totally uncontentious matter of Israel-Palestine.
DeleteAnons at 6.30 and 6.37. Do you really not understand what I said and why I said it?
DeleteAfraid to say 7.26, but do you not understand?
DeleteMany on either side refuse to let anybody NOT have an opinion and label them as genocide / terrorist enablers if they aren't too bothered about the whole thing and would rather concentrate their efforts on something closer to home such as Scottish independence.
Anon at 7.44. Really? Grow up.
Delete7.44 there are some like that definitely but it's not the mainstream view.
DeleteWell said.
ReplyDeleteRegarding the term 'Dehuminisation' outlined in the thread title, it was perfectly illustrated by a Traditional Unionist Voice MP in the last few days.
ReplyDeleteHe suggested that the Garvaghy Road should have been 'sanitised' by the PSNI to allow the O.O to parade down it.
'Sanitised'!
These unionists still live in an ancient British colonial bubble when Catholics were described as 'breeding-vermin' to be eradicated wherever possible.
That TUV clown epitomises all that is wrong with unionism.
Unionism constantly lives in some imaginary feudal 'golden age' where the sun never sets on the perfect harmony of the British Empire - and its slaves.
DeleteBritish Unionism has absolutely no place in the 21st century.
None whatsoever.
Embarrassing stuff from the clown @8:56pm.
DeleteStick yer independence where the sun disnae shine.
Rule Britannia.
The trial of a white man charged with the brutal, racially-motivate knife-murder of a black female doctor on a Dundee street last year, has just started at Dundee High Court.
ReplyDeleteI await an outraged demonstration/march of black-balaclava'd extreme right, self-proclaimed 'guardians of women' and their Reform/Restore backers at the crime scene..........
Any day now, surely???