It has to be said, though, that the Greens themselves have managed to top Labour's effort with an even more bonkers leaflet in Edinburgh Central. It not only claims that "Lorna Slater is winning Edinburgh Central" but provides a bar chart which purports to show that "it's between the Scottish Greens and Labour in Edinburgh Central". (As fluent speakers of Barchartese will instantly know, those words translate as "it's actually a three-cornered fight between the SNP, Labour and the Greens, but we'd rather you didn't know that because it's mainly the SNP we need to take votes from".) The bar chart specifically claims that the Greens are on 28%, Labour are on 22% and the SNP are in only third on 21%. These numbers are, to put it mildly, somewhat improbable because:
* The SNP won Edinburgh Central five years ago, with the Tories in second place, Labour third, and the Greens a distant fourth.
* Although the boundaries of the constituency have changed, the notional results suggest the SNP would still have won in 2021, with Labour moving into second, the Tories in third and the Greens remaining in a distant fourth.
* Even making a common sense adjustment for the fact that there was no Green candidate in the new part of the constituency in 2021, the Greens would still have been in fourth place.
* Although the Greens are undoubtedly in a stronger position now than they were in 2021, no MRP projection of the campaign so far supports their claim that Edinburgh Central is a two-horse race between themselves and Labour. YouGov have the constituency as a virtual three-way dead heat, with the SNP and Greens both on 25% and Labour on 23%, while Find Out Now have the SNP clearly ahead on 28%, the Greens in second place on 23% and Labour not that far behind on 21%.
So what on earth could the source be for this wildly improbable notion that Edinburgh Central is a two-horse race between Labour and the Greens? If you check the small print on the Green leaflet, you'll find out. It states: "source: ballotbox.scot". That means the Ballot Box Scotland website. You know, the same Ballot Box Scotland website that is run solely by a young gentleman by the name of Allan Faulds, who is a former serial Scottish Green party candidate in local elections and European Parliament elections. He's since nominally "left" the party, although he's made little secret of the fact that he did that solely for appearance's sake, ie. in the hope that people would stop laughing quite so hard whenever he angrily protests that his "project" is "non-partisan". He's also (perhaps surprisingly) made no secret of the truly heroic lengths he's gone to in order to flatter the Greens in the constituency projections on his site - he states in black and white that he factors in the 2021 list vote for projecting the Green constituency vote in 2026, but that he does not do this for any other party. To put in some perspective just how absurd that is, if you did use the 2021 list vote as a baseline for other parties, you'd be pretty close to projecting the SNP as being ahead in the Lib Dem fortresses of Shetland and Edinburgh North Western, which would plainly be barmy.
It's even worse than that, though, because notional figures show the Greens were a long way behind the SNP even on the list in Edinburgh Central in 2021 - and although they were in second place, both Labour and the Tories were only fractionally behind them. Any reasonable person looking at the bar chart on the Green leaflet would assume it's based on some kind of real measure of public opinion - either a real election from the past, or a real constituency-level opinion poll from the present. But it's neither. It's no more than a piece of candy-floss from Allan Faulds' own imagination, which piles wild assumption upon wild assumption in order to justify using the wrong baseline figures and then 'reimagining' them as he sees fit.
In a nutshell, then, the Greens' source for the baseless claim that Edinburgh Central is a two-way fight between themselves and Labour is a baseless claim made by a Green party candidate - ie. their source is themselves. This election is increasingly moving into Alice Through The Looking Glass territory, because the only reason I even saw the leaflet was because it was posted by the Brit Nat propagandist Sam Taylor of These Islands fame. He's trying to boost the Green campaign in Edinburgh Central, even though he clearly has more in common with the more centrist politics of the SNP candidate Angus Robertson than he does with Lorna Slater. Why is he doing that? Because it's the SNP he sees as the threat to his beloved Union, and he thinks losing Robertson would leave the SNP weakened.
Might just be worth bearing that in mind.
* * *
My latest constituency profiles for The National are Glasgow Southside and Glasgow Kelvin & Maryhill. I'm on a roll with these constituencies that I can claim a connection to, because I'm a graduate of Glasgow University, which is in the Kelvin & Maryhill seat.
* * *
If you are enjoying Scot Goes Pop's election coverage so much that you start to feel an inexplicable urge to buy me a hot chocolate or a ham-and-cheese toastie, donations are very welcome. There are three main options:
a) you can donate by card HERE
b) you can make a direct PayPal donation to my PayPal email address, which is: jkellysta@yahoo.co.uk
c) you can make a donation by bank transfer - for the necessary details, please drop me a line at my contact email address, which is: icehouse.250@gmail.com
a) you can donate by card HERE
b) you can make a direct PayPal donation to my PayPal email address, which is: jkellysta@yahoo.co.uk
c) you can make a donation by bank transfer - for the necessary details, please drop me a line at my contact email address, which is: icehouse.250@gmail.com
* * *
Over the last few months, I've been building up the Scot Goes Pop channel on YouTube - you can check it out HERE, and don't forget to subscribe.
Interestingly, if you search for "Angus Robertson Edinburgh Central" on BlueSky, one of the first posts that comes up is this from Allan Faulds (Ballot Box Scotland) just two months ago:
ReplyDelete"It really is a pity that given the possibility that the SNP could be proportionally due 5 Edinburgh and Lothian East MSPs, and that's also the region most likely to see a majority non-SNP constituency breakdown, that Angus Robertson losing Edinburgh Central may not actually turf him out of Holyrood."
Wow, how impressively "non-partisan", Allan! Who could ever doubt you!
He then replied to his own post to call Angus Robertson "a waste of space".
DeleteJust call him Allan "Neutrality" Faulds.
In the run up to the 2,000 Sydney, Summer Olympics, the Australian government put out a statement to reassure tourists. “Only two people have been killed by poison spider bites this century.”.
ReplyDeletePhew potential tourists gasped, “Only two people in the last hundred years.”.
Nah always carefully read the fine print, and think.
“Lies, damned lies and statistics.” attributed to Mark Twain.
Don’t live in Edinburgh thankfully.
ReplyDeleteI do. Shug is far from beloved. He's going to struggle, but he'll be in the mix for winning the seat.
DeleteThe Edinburgh Greens must have been reading some of the Edinburgh Lie Dems fantastical bar charts. Only the Lib Dems can win here! True in Cole Hamilton's little slice of Forever England on the west of town, but a little fib elsewhere.
The Libs are definitely competitive in my own seat: Northern, though. Anyone who knows Edinburgh's politics can look at this map and see the weight of "No."
https://www.boundaries.scot/wp-content/uploads/2025/09/Edinburgh_Northern.pdf
I'll be voting SNP to stop the tactical unionists (and Scotland in Union) electing a Liberal , but it's going to be close. There's just not much Yes to begin with here.
Scotland in Union would back Reform. That's how low they've descended to.
DeleteThe Toxic Woke Greens behaving like a typical Sassanach Yoon Party and I am no SNP fan either.
ReplyDeleteExplain woke. Now explain your nonsensical and confused post. Actually, don't bother.
DeleteAwright IFS.
Delete"woke" is a short-hand for what used to be called identity politics; an ideology consisting of a mashup between critical race theory, genderqueer theory, anti-racism, late-wave radical feminism and radical environmentalism which sees all human life and activity as destructive (- a literal death cult). Psychologically it is a form of neo-puritanism (everyone is corrupted by sin, all are damned; only the "elect" will be saved). It had earlier, unsuccessful, incarnations as "political correctness" from the 1990s (it was laughed out of town) and before that the "cultural marxism" of the "new left" of 1968. Cultural marxism was conceived by marxist theorists of the 60s as "the revolution had failed" and so what was necessary was now - "the long march through the institutions". Important figures - Foucault, Lacan, Derrida and Judith Butler, the notorious word-mangler and official "worst writer in the world" (winner of the bad writing award).
DeleteWokeness presents itself as "fighting the system" but it is now part of the system; the leftwing of neoliberalism and slavishly adopted by most western governments and corporations, and exported to the third world by NGOs. It is controlled opposition, favoured by elites and promoted by the middle class as essentially "a religion for atheists".
"greens" are bourgeois leftists who punch down on the working class
I'm not going to publish it, but devotees of KC will be thrilled to hear he's "speaking Scots" again today.
ReplyDeleteJings! Crivvens and help my boab! The constitutional deadlock in the UK state is awa wee the haggises up the hills and the sheep soon in the glens! Och!
DeleteDinnae fash yerselves Anas and Wes. Youse have it all sewn up, like a Marks & Spencer's sporan.