tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-930120922627919768.post8903047036409430964..comments2024-03-29T10:31:21.056+00:00Comments on SCOT goes POP!: My namesake's attempt to rig the next independence referendum by giving the No side a "sabotage-by-boycott" optionJames Kellyhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/01516007141763230886noreply@blogger.comBlogger73125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-930120922627919768.post-67795410891942328442019-11-28T08:35:08.721+00:002019-11-28T08:35:08.721+00:00Here I go again, moan again,the bloggs date is Tue...Here I go again, moan again,the bloggs date is Tuesday 26th, today's date Thursday 28th why am I always at the "coo's tail ?"Charles O'Brien.https://www.blogger.com/profile/10778040983298966024noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-930120922627919768.post-12260160186989440182019-11-28T08:32:18.188+00:002019-11-28T08:32:18.188+00:00Anonymous David Cameron already decided we Scots a...Anonymous David Cameron already decided we Scots are not equal in the Palace of Westminster, as the English MP,s can vote on all SCottish laws in Parliament but we Scots are banned from voting on English laws means a Scot can no longer be PM and perhaps have any senior post in government. Its OK I know it says strictly English laws that have no effect on Scottish laws as most of them will and do its a moot law I just thought amazing how Cameron conned them.Charles O'Brien.https://www.blogger.com/profile/10778040983298966024noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-930120922627919768.post-87460004571876902662019-11-28T08:23:38.890+00:002019-11-28T08:23:38.890+00:00Agreed.Agreed.Charles O'Brien.https://www.blogger.com/profile/10778040983298966024noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-930120922627919768.post-15014206098332939342019-11-27T19:40:29.657+00:002019-11-27T19:40:29.657+00:00When my Uncle Tommy was going to the toilet he alw...When my Uncle Tommy was going to the toilet he always said I'm off to the plop shop. Lena always said Don't buy anything. We always laughed. Priceless.Adam James McPhersonnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-930120922627919768.post-84557613172301333662019-11-27T16:05:38.306+00:002019-11-27T16:05:38.306+00:00You seem to of ignored the fact that I took your p...You seem to of ignored the fact that I took your point about the word 'lying' and my last to posts have how the Judge stated in his ruling that the SNP had decived people, this is a fact based on the defination of the word 'False' <br />False: not true, but made to seem true in order to deceive people<br /><br />On a side note can you explain why you think I am unionist; I cant remember ever mentioning that? <br /><br />Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-930120922627919768.post-22732984552698553512019-11-27T15:19:53.207+00:002019-11-27T15:19:53.207+00:00Best for Britain new MRP data;
Seat data:
gallery...Best for Britain new MRP data;<br />Seat data:<br /><br />gallery.mailchimp.com/a706d4e03dc82629db3f7acf9/files/ae6c2fb1-48aa-4c6f-8a3d-b5f8fd958956/Best_for_Britain_Recommendation_Seats.pdf<br /><br />Scotland only seems to have Tory 2017 seats and some marginals shown. SNP gain Ochil (Stirling not polled) only. SNP and Green vote bigger than LD's in Edinburgh W and Duns E. And Labour holding Edinburgh S and surprisingly Glasgow N E.scobladinoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-930120922627919768.post-91969236850503601072019-11-27T14:34:30.829+00:002019-11-27T14:34:30.829+00:00I'm going to end this by saying it's reall...I'm going to end this by saying it's really incredible how hard it is for some unionists to just be honest.<br /><br />The SNP loses a court case clearly. They had a sentence which, while true in a broad, moral sense (the fracking company director donations to Swindon's office are all over the news), was not legally correct. So they lost the case and the leaflet is withdrawn. A clear victory for Swindon.<br /><br />So why the need to lie when you've won? Why the need to put words into the mouths ('lying') of the judge? I really don't get this inability to just be honest, even in the fact of victory.<br /><br />Lying has done so much damage to unionism that Yes is now ~50%, yet they persist. <br /><br />Och well, carry on I suppose!Scottish Skierhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/10584099659760612109noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-930120922627919768.post-43448144559775379992019-11-27T14:25:36.957+00:002019-11-27T14:25:36.957+00:00Here's the definition false:
false
/fɔːls,fɒl...Here's the definition false:<br /><br />false<br />/fɔːls,fɒls/<br /> Learn to pronounce<br />adjective<br />1.<br />not according with truth or fact; incorrect.<br /><br />The ruling doesn't including the words 'liars' or 'lying', as per your original post. Sorry.Scottish Skierhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/10584099659760612109noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-930120922627919768.post-47797696612602872362019-11-27T13:58:08.097+00:002019-11-27T13:58:08.097+00:00Exactly. GWC doesn't need one and he's an ...Exactly. GWC doesn't need one and he's an expert at it.Rupprecht von Hentzaunoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-930120922627919768.post-63181584578466591842019-11-27T13:50:53.189+00:002019-11-27T13:50:53.189+00:00But Lord Pentland said a statement on the leaflet ...But Lord Pentland said a statement on the leaflet was false in substance<br /><br />Again False: not true, but made to seem true in order to deceive people<br /><br />So the SNP published a leaflet that set out to deceive the public. Doesn't matter if it was once sentence or 100. This is correct based on what the judge said and the definition of the word 'False'.<br /><br />Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-930120922627919768.post-39801747473150686912019-11-27T13:13:43.412+00:002019-11-27T13:13:43.412+00:00The court did not rule the SNP are 'lying'...The court did not rule the SNP are 'lying'. The court ruled a single sentence in the leaflet was of 'false substance', i.e. not correct. No ruling was made on intent to deceive, and no reference was made to the definition you link to, which is one of many. My wikipedia link doesn't need to be in the ruling as it simply stands as self evident. The judge made no call on intent to deceive as this would be defamatory itself without evidence.<br /><br />That's it. You are just a liar it would appear, and it is lying that will cost unionists another election according to polls. <br /><br />Why not just speak the truth for once and accept a sentence in the SNP leaflet was not factually correct and that's all that's been decided?<br /><br />Here is the real vote swinging stuff.<br /><br />https://twitter.com/VictoriaLIVE/status/1144186897943519233<br /><br />After watching this, Scots will conclude that the SNP were right, and legal semantics won. Which is what happened it would appear.Scottish Skierhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/10584099659760612109noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-930120922627919768.post-16097201652959816562019-11-27T12:47:05.267+00:002019-11-27T12:47:05.267+00:00GWC..
https://www.google.com/amp/s/m.wikihow.com/...GWC..<br /><br />https://www.google.com/amp/s/m.wikihow.com/Get-a-Life%3famp=1Mac1314https://www.blogger.com/profile/04064483975661032256noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-930120922627919768.post-83634843178526857542019-11-27T12:36:29.073+00:002019-11-27T12:36:29.073+00:00KNOB @11:21am. You do not need a license to be a w...KNOB @11:21am. You do not need a license to be a wanker. GWCnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-930120922627919768.post-64241120369670875522019-11-27T11:59:00.258+00:002019-11-27T11:59:00.258+00:00Why are using Wikipedia to get find out a meaning ...Why are using Wikipedia to get find out a meaning of word, you use a dictionary for that, even my 5 year old understands that:<br />False: not true, but made to seem true in order to deceive people<br />https://dictionary.cambridge.org/dictionary/english/false<br /><br />So the Scottish courts have found the SNP guilty of trying to deceive the electorate. Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-930120922627919768.post-63260515322359490662019-11-27T11:27:34.072+00:002019-11-27T11:27:34.072+00:00I think the judge was correct in his findings - th...I think the judge was correct in his findings - the SNP constituency office should have told it like it is rather than 'sexing it up'. However, I think the coverage in the media -including the BBC - of the link with fracking will reach more people than the dustbin bound leaflet anyway.WTnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-930120922627919768.post-46001810771266249582019-11-27T11:24:15.704+00:002019-11-27T11:24:15.704+00:00We've started fracking under yer hoose. We'...We've started fracking under yer hoose. We've sampled your muck.<br /><br />Complain and you will feel the full force of the law - you... dirty... old... man.Joao Divisionnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-930120922627919768.post-24661395476324932002019-11-27T11:21:07.964+00:002019-11-27T11:21:07.964+00:00I have a merchant banker's licence.I have a merchant banker's licence.GWCnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-930120922627919768.post-45275246520170443302019-11-27T11:13:58.050+00:002019-11-27T11:13:58.050+00:00It is because of Nat si pricks like you that the y...It is because of Nat si pricks like you that the yoons vote the way they do. Do try something original like Yoon blood profile tests to see if they are true celts. We Unionists have the same concerns as British Jews have with Labour. GWCnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-930120922627919768.post-24920302433432950392019-11-27T11:06:09.611+00:002019-11-27T11:06:09.611+00:00Please provide a link to where the ruling states t...Please provide a link to where the ruling states the SNP set out intentionally to deceive. I cannot find this. Google searching the words Swindon and 'false in substance' and I get hits. 'Deceive' yields no results. <br /><br />This was not defamation case. It looks like you are either wrong or lying.<br /><br />False = not true.<br /><br />https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/False_statement<br /><br /><i>A false statement is a statement that is not true. Although the word fallacy is sometimes used as a synonym for false statement, that is not how the word is used in philosophy, mathematics, logic and most formal contexts.<br /><br />A false statement need not be a lie. A lie is a statement that is known to be untrue and is used to mislead. A false statement is a statement that is untrue but not necessarily told to mislead, as a statement given by someone who does not know it is untrue.</i><br /><br />Anyway, I think we are done. The SNP have not been found to be lying/defaming Jo from Swindon. However, you seem to be a liar from the evidence in hand. <br /><br />What people do know is that Swindon is happy to commit the genocide of millions of innocent people without hesitation. That and her office welcomes large donations from companies in the fracking industry.Scottish Skierhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/10584099659760612109noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-930120922627919768.post-82715189623328509622019-11-27T10:50:49.615+00:002019-11-27T10:50:49.615+00:00 As reported in another place by HWMNBN. If th... As reported in another place by HWMNBN. If the 40% rule had been in place in 2014 then No would have won without a single negative vote being cast. The Labour part and democracy have only a passing resemblance.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-930120922627919768.post-26216925791884311122019-11-27T10:47:20.069+00:002019-11-27T10:47:20.069+00:00I'll take your point on lying so will go on th...I'll take your point on lying so will go on the ruling:<br />But Lord Pentland said a statement on the leaflet was false in substance<br />as i said above <br />False = not true, but made to seem true in order to deceive people<br />deceive: deliberately cause (someone) to believe something that is not true<br /><br />So a factual and fair statement is that the SNP deliberately set out to deceive the electorate with a statement on the leaflet. <br /><br />Think that accurately sums up the situation.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-930120922627919768.post-92074824241911877652019-11-27T10:40:15.586+00:002019-11-27T10:40:15.586+00:00 If Swindles constituency office is in receipt o... If Swindles constituency office is in receipt of stolen goods or money gained from illegal sources then the person who benefits from such largess can only be swindle herself, not her staff. Yet again the legal establishment in Scotland fails to uphold the law in their support of Yoons.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-930120922627919768.post-21255806622243606822019-11-27T09:50:19.570+00:002019-11-27T09:50:19.570+00:00Seeing as she more than likely going to win her se...<i>Seeing as she more than likely going to win her seat her local campaign (which this case revolves around) seems to be doing ok so does not need turning around.</i><br /><br />She was always and remains likely to win her seat, but it's fair to say the chances of an upset have increased a bit over the last few weeks, no?keatonnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-930120922627919768.post-58060381541191023632019-11-27T09:40:21.451+00:002019-11-27T09:40:21.451+00:00Disgraceful to see GWC pathetically licking the bo...Disgraceful to see GWC pathetically licking the boots of his fash EU masters. Should we just keep voting until we give the result they want, GWC?Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-930120922627919768.post-420515653205184172019-11-27T08:41:41.325+00:002019-11-27T08:41:41.325+00:00Jo Swindon's lawyers wanted to stop the leafle...Jo Swindon's lawyers wanted to stop the leaflet going out. For that, all the court had to do was decide whether the information was actually 100% accurate or not. And that's what it did. The conclusion was no. The donation was to her office, not her personally, and legally that's key. Morals are not for the court to decide. <br /><br />The court did not conclude on whether the SNP were intentionally misleading (lying), nor if defamation had occurred. Instead, the court clearly stated that concluding as such would require a defamation case, which Jo Swindon could pursue based on the fact the leaflet was a false statement. <br /><br />This is what I am honestly reading. Scottish Skierhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/10584099659760612109noreply@blogger.com