tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-930120922627919768.post2458072144174395634..comments2024-03-28T10:46:35.575+00:00Comments on SCOT goes POP!: YouGov poll hints at further movement to the SNP since the general electionJames Kellyhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/01516007141763230886noreply@blogger.comBlogger54125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-930120922627919768.post-46795393417487139152015-05-30T12:56:29.977+01:002015-05-30T12:56:29.977+01:00Not assuming that at all. Those that cannot be per...Not assuming that at all. Those that cannot be persuaded are the 30 odd % Brits that you are talking about. What we are talking about is the best way to turn the 15% or so soft no's into yes. I am arguing that soft no's will, as many were at the beginning and throughout the first indy ref campaign, open to reasonable, considered and logical argument. It takes time and requires the pressure of an imminent decision, yes or no, that only a real referendum campaign brings. Otherwise soft no's will simply stay where they are and not engage. <br /><br />You and others appear to be arguing that we go through the risk and heat of another referendum arguing for a situation neither of us agree's with, because a group of undecided and uncommitted electorate (they are 'soft' no's after all) THINK that's what they want. They think that because they have not spent any time investigating the reality of that position. Something that a full on referendum on FFA will spend it's whole time exposing. Only this time you and I would find ourselves arguing for the impossible and appearing like naive dreamers in the face of unionist refusals. <br /><br />This was the entire weakness of our currency position in the last referendum. It was not that our proposals were not reasonable or workable, it was the unionists ability to utterly refuse to be reasonable and so undermine us as naive dreamers in the eyes of the public. They got away with it last time and would do exactly the same for a FFA referendum and it would be even more likely to work this time. <br /><br />Imagine the catastrophe a no to FFA would be treated as. Why have you so little faith in the arguments for full independence? Something this big just needs more than one bite to finish the job and that means another indy referendum campaign ASAP before everyone forgets the arguments, lies and false promises made during the last one. Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-930120922627919768.post-28413924834636161802015-05-30T12:28:28.784+01:002015-05-30T12:28:28.784+01:00I think that you (plural) are assuming that the gr...I think that you (plural) are assuming that the grannies are soft No's when they are in fact Brits (not in the orange lodge sense) and so not really amenable to argument. <br />You can tell them that their Britain no longer exists but they are in denial about that. There's not that much that you can do about that except wait and go for devomax.<br />Devomax has four advantages, it brings some of the soft No's along with us, builds confidence in our country, removing the cringe, it shows up Westminster for the unbending centralists they are and it keeps the momentum going.<br />In the event of a Brexit all bets are off and people then have to choose between two different unions which is a completely different ball game. We might even bring some libdems and Labour along with us. I wonder if McLeish would move to our side in that situation for example.McCafferyhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/01873464074643303862noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-930120922627919768.post-42766497427237811752015-05-29T16:48:22.301+01:002015-05-29T16:48:22.301+01:00Chalks,
yes i see and understand your argument re ...Chalks,<br />yes i see and understand your argument re the 15% soft no's. Unfortunately they are in actual fact 'soft' and therefore open to actual, proper and well considered argument (if you can get such people to pay attention long enough to get involved in the detailed argument). In my experience, many of those soft no's are people who came to the party so late that it was impossible to bring them along the argument road quick enough for the vote. <br /><br />Once the pressure of the decision date was taken away, those soft no's just stopped at the point in the journey to yes that they had reached during the all encompassing social pressures of the Indy ref campaign. Come indyref2 those soft no's will pick up on the journey just where they left off. The important point is getting folk to start the journey in the first place and for most, that takes the social pressure and excitement of a potentially life changing decision and it's accompanying political campaign.<br /><br />You cannot fight a referendum on the whims of the 15% least committed of the electorate. That's triangulation and might work to some degree (temporarily) in a basically two party political system, but on a single point of principle referendum, that will only lead to disaster. Soft no's will not be pounding the street, creating the vibrant exciting atmosphere and making the arguments.<br /><br />Triangulation is why the Euro referendum could become a real mess for the SNP and by association the YES movement. I would not recommend the same mistake for our core principle during any future Scottish Independence referendum.<br /><br />bracoAnonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-930120922627919768.post-16863601508668055672015-05-29T15:55:14.833+01:002015-05-29T15:55:14.833+01:00Braco, whilst I agree with you regarding the EU re...Braco, whilst I agree with you regarding the EU referendum and the hypocrisy it might lead to, I don't agree about the FFA points you make.<br /><br />The point regarding FFA is that it's very easy to argue for it, whilst ripping away the most emotive arguments that Better Together had. You can throw everything back in their face.<br /><br />Currency stays the same, pensions backed up by the strength of the UK (LOL) but we are responsible for them and have power to raise it etc. <br /><br />Defence policy is decided by basically a senate, which will have a greater number of English senators, naturally, same with foreign policy.<br /><br />Each federal state has the power to ask for more money but it's backed up by the Bank of England, which is soon to be renamed...borrowing is put to a monetary policy committee made up of people from each country as it would ultimately affect the UK's credit rating....that's the thing with FFA and what the SNP can try and get, a federal UK, where each nation is responsible for its economy, borrowing, but puts money into defence and foreign policy decided by an elected senate<br /><br />If the SNP suggested such a thing, it would be complete pie in the sky, but the point is that they are going down the same route as soft no's, holding their hands as they merrily skip along the federal road, only for Westminster to turn round and laugh at them. They are trying to do what 15% of soft no's now want, running our own affairs but within the UK....<br /><br />Where do you think the soft no's will go once they've been laughed at? Back up the federal road with the SNP and down Independence Road. <br /><br />I'm afraid that's the only way I can see us winning the next indy ref. Gradualism and pointing out that what people want isn't necessarily possible.<br /><br /> <br /><br />chalksnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-930120922627919768.post-77580025742723113422015-05-29T13:49:26.051+01:002015-05-29T13:49:26.051+01:00Also, the time for the indy movement pushing for a...Also, the time for the indy movement pushing for a full fiscal autonomy referendum question was during Indyref1. Think of the the arguments we would have to have to defend full fiscal autonomy as the sole question in the referendum. Those are the very financial/ share the pound with full tax powers etc. that the unionists hammered us with during Indy ref 1. We essentially went into that referendum, financially at least, advocating full fiscal autonomy within the 'UK' for an Indy Scotland and you and Muttley have already sited that policy as one of the YES campaigns greatest flaws. A flaw I might add inherited from the SNP party political policy menu.<br /><br />How do you propose to fight that ffa referendum in the teeth of those same unionist arguments/scare stories without even the option of saying 'well that's why we have the option of full Independence'.<br /><br />Similar complex problems are about to face the SNP and YES movement over the IN out Euro referendum. Can we really get behind a 'better together YES' message for Europe while the pro euro side in England hammer home how we need to be part of a bigger Union to be financially secure/viable. These are all core arguments against Scottish Indy when viewed through the prism of English (as British) politics and MSM attacks.<br /><br />braco<br />Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-930120922627919768.post-86859870995417490232015-05-29T13:25:04.608+01:002015-05-29T13:25:04.608+01:00All the above are good points ...but fall into the...All the above are good points ...but fall into the same trap of believing every change that's coming is inevitably going to be to the benefit of indy. One reason that pensioners can be scared into NO is because they have a pension to be scared with. As folk become pensioners and become dependent on their pension, so they become more susceptible to that kind of attack. Pensioners present and future will always to some extent be easily scared into NO. <br />The point I am making is that real and bankable inroads into independence as a reality comes from the real debates brought about by the actual indyref campaigns with the force of a decision to be taken at the end of it. Not from the pros and cons theoretical arguments that go round and round when there is no pressure of decision making at the end of it.<br /><br />We made these incredible inroads and we are here teetering on the edge BECAUSE of the Indyref YES campaign and it's aftermath! That's why the Union has spent the last 300 years absolutely avoiding any referendum on Independence. It's the argument that kills the union and the indyref campaigns are the only forum in which those arguments can be properly heard and taken seriously.<br /><br />That's why we have 56 of 59 Mps. It's simple.<br /><br />braco Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-930120922627919768.post-69150590003149086902015-05-29T12:17:40.459+01:002015-05-29T12:17:40.459+01:00Good points there Graeme.Good points there Graeme.muttley79noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-930120922627919768.post-21880022130385327652015-05-29T11:50:51.269+01:002015-05-29T11:50:51.269+01:0011. Growth of the new media and the Internet. 11. Growth of the new media and the Internet. Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-930120922627919768.post-12927118219951695172015-05-29T11:50:03.361+01:002015-05-29T11:50:03.361+01:00Sam,
There are some things that you left out of y...Sam,<br /><br />There are some things that you left out of your analysis of the situation. 1. The MSM is dieing 2. The BBC is likely to be killed off eventually by the Tories (their programming is terrible anyway). 3. The electorate is far more educated. 4. Trust of MSM and BBC is at an all time low. 5. The demographics of Indy support is in our favour for now. 6. Trust of unionist parties is at an all time low. 7. The economy in Scotland is strong, robust and getting stronger. 8. It is slowly becoming obvious how badly treated Scotland is by London. 9. Westminsters likely failures. 10. Tory cuts. Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-930120922627919768.post-11258427796922924862015-05-29T11:04:45.914+01:002015-05-29T11:04:45.914+01:00You are missing one thing, demographics. You seem ...You are missing one thing, demographics. You seem to think that the old grannies who came out for the union can be convinced that their pensions are safe etc... but what if the reason that they voted No was because they are British. No amount of persuasion can change that, only the slow inevitable push of demographics. <br />We need time to normalise the separation of the Scottish and English polities. We also need our media to be scottish.<br /><br />I can see the fear we have - of losing momentum. I think that to keep it going we need another referendum on devomax by 2018 - it must be in the manifesto. That will keep the argument fresh and slowly but surely make independence feel inevitable while the demographics move it further in our favour.McCafferyhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/01873464074643303862noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-930120922627919768.post-15574971194904436282015-05-29T10:33:56.997+01:002015-05-29T10:33:56.997+01:00James, reading this makes we wonder if you ever th...James, reading this makes we wonder if you ever thought about adding polls to your blog for your readers? It would be thought provoking to see relative support for various options surrounding independence, ie, holyrood VI, Brexit, Scexit(?!), Indyref2 conditions, Indy currency, etc. Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-930120922627919768.post-38885215279557536952015-05-28T23:23:51.737+01:002015-05-28T23:23:51.737+01:00Sorry, that was for Hapleg.
bracoSorry, that was for Hapleg.<br /><br />bracoAnonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-930120922627919768.post-41166854279313868302015-05-28T23:22:08.925+01:002015-05-28T23:22:08.925+01:00It's the indyref2 yes campaign that will tip &...It's the indyref2 yes campaign that will tip 'the balance of opinion decisively in favour of independence' just as the first indyref yes campaign did. Waiting for a change is just as likely to result in the possibility of 'change' less, not more' favourable to our cause. That's why every unionist party and media outlet is trying desperately to place a second indy referendum campaign off the agenda. 'Waiting' suits them fine. That alone, as an indy supporter, should give everyone reason to think twice about the wisdom of waiting.<br /><br />bracoAnonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-930120922627919768.post-57118468059270183192015-05-28T22:51:43.830+01:002015-05-28T22:51:43.830+01:00'Do you understand that if we lose a second re... 'Do you understand that if we lose a second referendum on independence then that is our chance gone for good?'<br /><br />Who says? That's what was being said about losing indyref 1. It was about how it was fought by the unionists and that aftermath is now being felt. If they are not forced to fight dirty, then the pro indy aftermath cannot be felt.<br /><br />Waiting will not tackle the issues you raise muttley. Fighting another referendum campaign will. We are not where we were pre refererendum and niether are the unionists, that much should be obvious.<br /><br />bracoAnonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-930120922627919768.post-30608610939009659162015-05-28T22:33:16.176+01:002015-05-28T22:33:16.176+01:00Here is the deal Sam. You say we are sitting on t...Here is the deal Sam. You say we are sitting on the fence. Do you understand that if we lose a second referendum on independence then that is our chance gone for good? <br /><br />There needs to be a lot more work done before we get independence, that should be obvious to everyone who saw how Yes dealt with the currency issue, the pensions issue, the bombardment of the MSM and big business, not to mention the USA in the referendum. The EU were not exactly helpful either. Make no mistake although the British state has been weakened considerably in the last 60 years, it is still a formidable opponent to Scottish independence. No amount of wishful thinking is going to change that fact.muttley79noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-930120922627919768.post-18440048399796153262015-05-28T21:41:56.458+01:002015-05-28T21:41:56.458+01:00Sam,
I agree with just about everything you have s...Sam,<br />I agree with just about everything you have said .. except that it's the SNP themselves (at the moment) who are putting the possibility of an imminent indyref2 on the back burner. Everything you warn of will happen regardless of a 'material change in circumstances' or not and so, in my view (and many others too), I think we should be agitating for indyref2 ASAP.<br /><br />Currently, unionism in Scotland as a political force has never been weaker and pro indy support never stronger. This may not remain the case for ever. Scotland's independence will not be won through a willingness to simply wait long enough. We have already tried that technique over the last 300 and odd years.<br /><br />It was action, in the form of the first ever independence referendum, a referendum some say the SNP felt came 'too soon', that has brought us to the brink. It will be another forced action, brought about by public demand, that will gently but decisively tip us over into independence. We must find ways to make it clear to the SNP that they do indeed have in Scotland the support and political 'room for maneuver' to call that referendum ASAP.<br /><br />bracoAnonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-930120922627919768.post-73390303137458101552015-05-28T21:01:39.500+01:002015-05-28T21:01:39.500+01:00By voicing the "" distant "" d...By voicing the "" distant "" drum of another referendum ... you weaken the case....<br />Jeesus wept.... all this sitting on the fence... the libs tactics... "" well we should be independent... and I fully support it.... but not just now..... just some time away in the distant future.... unless some unexpected circumstance comes about """ .....in the name of all that's holy.... by the time all these sitters on the fence realise whats happening then we can forget it.... as every single day Scotland's resources are being plundered .... Scotland's economy is being subtlebly strangled.... production shifts south of the border... contracts are placed... & the BRANCH economy is being strengthened... and when the next referendum comes the wm machine will have tightened up those bits that they feel are a wee bit loose just now.... the soft nos will have turned into hard no's as the drip drip drip influence of wm mouthpiece ... the monopoly bbc.... will have flogged the 1st & 2nd world wars to exhaustion...aligned with the succession of the monarchy.... & the huge MSM/EU propaganda biased reporting on re-running the fear factor with Scotland being forced to take the Euro... and the 56.... every choice adjective will be applied by the unionists to their advantage... with their venom aimed at A.S. in particular... <br />All this list vote is unproductive.. it should be SNP first & last... as simple as that... when we have Indy... then the eventual split of the various camps of the SNP & Holyrood will be natural... Anonymoushttps://www.blogger.com/profile/12855746157077074901noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-930120922627919768.post-10780936148402493602015-05-28T15:21:17.593+01:002015-05-28T15:21:17.593+01:00I agree but I think it will not limit it to Brexit...I agree but I think it will not limit it to Brexit, just in case something else extraordinary happens in the next Scottish Parliament term which tips the balance of opinion decisively in favour of independence - the catch-all 'material change in circumstances', carefully worded and so able to be deployed at the leadership's discretion.Haplegnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-930120922627919768.post-90740494160775634132015-05-28T15:11:47.848+01:002015-05-28T15:11:47.848+01:00I believe that the SNP leadership will have a pled...I believe that the SNP leadership will have a pledge in 2016 about holding another referendum on independence if we leave the EU, but it will have so many caveats as to be obvious that it is not really on the agenda at all. I think this is really about removing the dilemma over the promise of holding an independence referendum once in a generation. So there will probably be a pledge, but it will be one designed for the longer term, probably in about 2025 imo. muttley79noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-930120922627919768.post-23192806463902627242015-05-28T14:46:42.696+01:002015-05-28T14:46:42.696+01:00And bear in mind that if SNP support is high enoug...And bear in mind that if SNP support is high enough, even if the party gets all nine constituencies in a region, it can still pick up a tenth seat on the list.<br /><br />Harvie's strategy is to persuade SNP voters that they should sacrifice this extra seat for maybe two Green seats instead. To the massive benefit of his own party, and him personally if it ends up with him as Deputy First Minister which I think is what he's angling for, having been disappointed in that in 2011 because the SNP did well enough to govern without a partner.<br /><br />It's an enormous risk. It will inevitably weaken the SNP, perhaps fatally if the constituency vote goes a wee bit wrong. Even if it goes to plan, the end result will be a weakened SNP possibly reliant on Green support in Holyrood. Don't do it.Rolfehttps://www.blogger.com/profile/16206952819245786811noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-930120922627919768.post-5047644998662435432015-05-28T14:41:50.689+01:002015-05-28T14:41:50.689+01:00I know that muscleguy, but I'm only pointing o...I know that muscleguy, but I'm only pointing out that we're arguing to stay in something where we don't actually have a say in anything to do with it....if we were independent, doesn't really matter as we aren't, its the system we operate in currently that matters and currently we have no say in how things affect us when it comes to the EU...that might not be the EU's fault, granted but we are also saying we want a fairer society, wealth distribution more fair, but the EU is effectively a bigger version of the UK, the rich tell the poor what to do, they get richer, the poor get poorer, see Italy/Portugal/Greece/spain<br /><br />I struggle to see how the SNP will play it, I'd be in favour of them being open about it and letting people argue for or against being in it.....as consider this, Cameron gets his way and gets much more control over immigration, where does that leave Scotland? <br /><br />We, as everyone knows, need immigrants, yet the EU we are voting to stay in, has just turned round and gone against a principle of itself!? How could we argue to stay in something that could do that? <br /><br />How would people vote then? <br /><br />Cameron isn't arguing for better wealth distribution, isn't arguing for the little guys that have had the life sucked out of them<br /><br />Things would be a hell of a lot easier if we were independent, maybe no voters will wake upchalksnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-930120922627919768.post-68817491935516699462015-05-28T14:27:11.128+01:002015-05-28T14:27:11.128+01:00The thing is, you have no idea whether they will g...The thing is, you have no idea whether they will get enough votes on the list or not. If your primary political allegiance is to one of the smaller parties, then by all means vote for that party on the list. That's what the list is for. Tactical voting in a PR system is a mugs game.<br /><br />The SNP will undoubtedly get fewer list votes than constituency votes, as supporters of smaller parties with no chance of taking the constituency vote SNP for the constituency. This is not a problem. The problem starts when people whose primary political allegiance is SNP start thinking they can get clever.<br /><br />Turning away from the SNP on the list, for an SNP supporter, makes the enormous and unjustifiable assumption that the party is going to perform an almost clean sweep of the 73 constituencies. This is anything but guaranteed. Some manufactured scandal, something going wrong at Westminster, even just natural attrition of support for governing party, could easily see a significant number of constituency seats lost. A couple of hundred votes one way of the other, and disaster could follow.<br /><br />Of course it's not disaster if the list vote holds up, because these lost MSPs will be compensated for on the list. But if massive overconfidence has led to SNP supporters going elsewhere on the list, that won't happen. You're effectively limiting the SNP to however many of the 73 FPTP seats it manages to win. Do you feel lucky, punk?<br /><br />The result is likely to be that the SNP secures fewer than the 2011 tally of 69 seats. Very possibly even less than the 65 needed for an overall majority. Big headlines, SNP losing support, SNP weakened, and the whole thing portrayed as a loss for the party.<br /><br />It may be that the Greens get enough seats for the SNP to continue to govern with their support. Great work, SNP tactical voters, you just swapped a strong SNP government for a weak SNP minority government propped up by Patrick Harvie (whose idea this seems to be, gosh I wonder why, what could be in it for him?)<br /><br />It could be even worse than that though. The weakening of the SNP's list support could allow one of the unionist parties to come through the middle, without giving the Greens or the SSP enough votes for a list seat. Well done, chaps.<br /><br />Tactical voting strategies sent the #SNPout mob stark, staring mad. We can't follow them down that road. If you're an SNP supporter, and you believe that Nicola Sturgeon leading a strong SNP government is the best route to independence, for God's sake vote SNP on the list. It's the more important of the two votes. If you fancy a tactical punt on something else in the constituency, go for it, but it's vitally important that the SNP list vote holds up.Rolfehttps://www.blogger.com/profile/16206952819245786811noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-930120922627919768.post-18049990158845779892015-05-28T13:59:42.366+01:002015-05-28T13:59:42.366+01:00"influential Nationalist blogger"... ooh..."influential Nationalist blogger"... ooh, get him!Stoatnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-930120922627919768.post-67272153585776516162015-05-28T13:54:14.683+01:002015-05-28T13:54:14.683+01:00James - I see you've been name-checked by Iain...James - I see you've been name-checked by Iain MacWhirter today in the Herald over your musings on whether the SNP should take seats in the Lords:<br /><br />http://www.heraldscotland.com/comment/columnists/queens-speech-throws-a-tax-challenge-to-snp.127334447Haplegnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-930120922627919768.post-79637718320593329392015-05-28T13:45:11.925+01:002015-05-28T13:45:11.925+01:00This comment has been removed by the author.De sfhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/12710211751133353737noreply@blogger.com